🚨New paper alert! 🚨 "Meat, money and messaging: How the environmental and health harms of red and processed meat consumption are framed by the meat industry". Thanks to the fantastic @DrKathrynClare for leading us on this #CDOH paper. A short thread 🧵 sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Reducing meat consumption has both health and environmental benefits, as highlighted by the Lancet EAT commission: eatforum.org/eat-lancet-com…
However, this does mean the meat industry may stand lose out in revenue and the potential for future growth.
We know that the producers of harmful products like tobacco, alcohol or fossil fuels attempt to prevent revenue loss by funding science and creating doubt about product harms, see for example our paper: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
However, to date the activities of the meat industry in this respect have not received a similar focus. This study sought to address this gap by interrogating how the meat industry framed health and environmental aspects of their products
We found that the meat industry engaged in familiar activities, including questioning the evidence on the health and environmental impacts of meat
⚡️ New paper just out from our research group! "Manufacturing doubt: Assessing the effects of independent vs industry-sponsored messaging about the harms of fossil fuels, smoking, alcohol, and sugar sweetened beverages" #CDOH@SPECTRUMRessciencedirect.com/science/articl… 🧵below!
Background: We know that harmful product manufacturers, most notably tobacco, have sought to dispute the evidence on the harms they cause, to stall public support for effective policy and prevent informed customers from steering clear of their products
One way they do this is through “alternative causation arguments”. The tobacco industry was infamous for this, attempting to offer alternative causes for lung cancer. The key was to create doubt about the link to smoking.
The news about @PHE_uk being replaced by an infection-disease-focused body is at odds with some of the main lessons emerging from #COVID19 in the US. Some thoughts (thread) 1/10
Health is largely shaped by our physical and social environments, pandemic or not. That is why we see 30 year differences in life expectancy between the most and least affluent zip codes, and why COVID deaths are so disproportionate too 2/10
Many of the factors underpinning this disparity in health originate "upstream", and outside healthcare. Some are amenable to action at the local authority level. Many however are influenced by decisions nationally, and these longer term decisions did not help in the US 3/10