Finally out! On the European Central Bank, technocracy, and one of the most painful chapters in European integration: the #ECB’s treatment of sovereign debt (going from 1988 till 2020)

A quick summary 👇 /1
#Openaccess academic.oup.com/ser/advance-ar…
In 2005, the ECB’s treatment of sovereign debt became market-based. From then on, any government whose debt lost the approval of Moodys, S&P and @FitchRatings would no longer be accepted by the ECB /2
These strict rules placed the ECB right at the heart of the 2010-12 sovereign debt panic.

Using interviews and new archival sources I ask: Why didn’t the ECB do more to stabilize markets? And why was one mid-March video call enough to stop the 2020 panic? /3
The archives show that in 1995 the @bundesbank had fought hard to resist a market-based treatment of sovereign debt /4
I explain the sudden turn to private credit ratings in 2005 through the efforts of board members #Trichet and #Issing to depoliticize the treatment of government debt – deliberately taking away the ECB’s discretion /5
That nuances Athanasios Orphanides‘s view on which the ECB used its 2005 collateral rule as ‘disciplining device against member states’ - the policy may have been a debacle, but not therefore a case of hawkish malice /6
The ECB's strategy worked initially, keeping debate about sovereign debt and collateral rules within a small circle of central bankers and financial market analysts /7
When credit ratings started to drop, however, the ECB’s staunch adherence to its self-imposed rules became a key driver of the 2010-12 bond market panic /8
But the ECB did learn! The 2010-12 debacle set the central bank up for a much more effective 2020 pandemic response, quickly casting away its self-imposed rules /9
However, the status of government debt remains shaky. (At least formally) the ECB still relies on credit ratings.

Rather than technocratic depoliticization, the treatment of government debt needs a genuine political answer: Only the EU member states can solve this issue /end
Article available open access here: academic.oup.com/ser/advance-ar…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jens van 't Klooster 💸💸💸

Jens van 't Klooster 💸💸💸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jvtklooster

Jan 3
Did policymaking really change after 2008? Not immediately, but a genuine paradigm shift is taking place… amongst central bankers and EU technocrats setting financial and fiscal rules.

Technocratic Keynesianism - A summary👇

Open access at @NPEjournal: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10… Image
In 2020, the European Central Bank funded 92% of the pandemic deficit incurred by Member States fighting the pandemic – I show that this is monetary financing in all but name
Also, the past year every trick in the rulebook has been used to push banks to green their lending – basically a return to pre-1990s @eric_monnet style credit guidance for sustainable finance
Read 15 tweets
Oct 29, 2019
This is BS of course "Mr Weidmann said such a move would contradict the principle of market neutrality that is enshrined in EU law." ft.com/content/60d983… @OlafStorbeck @MAmdorsky /1
The term “market neutrality” is not from the Treaty but rather a very recent addition to ECB vocabulary. In fact, in a 2008 paper ECB officials explicitly deny that its operations are “market neutral”. ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops…
/2
The @ecb mandate contains two passages that might mistakenly be taken to imply the Weidman's radical neoliberal notion of neutrality. One is a uniquely vague passages about acting “in accordance with the principle of an open market economy” (TFEU 119) /3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(