We think it is a positive and welcome step in the right direction. Thank you @EHRCChair and @Marcial_Boo
1) It clarifies that “sex” (as understood in the Equality Act 2010) is binary, and that a person’s legal sex is their biological sex as recorded on their birth certificate.
2) It says that a gender recognition certificate is not relevant to decision-making about access to single-sex services.
3) It sets out everyday reasons that can be a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim” for providing single-sex services, including the dignity and privacy of users.
4) It goes back to the Equality Act and ditches unhelpful language from the Statutory Code of Practice, such as “exceptional circumstances” and individual “case by case” assessment.
5) It gives lots of examples where it would be lawful to exclude all transwomen (i.e. biological males who identity as women) from using a female service, including rape counselling, women’s refuges, fitness classes, communal changing rooms at a gym, and male and female toilets
6) The guidance recommends that service providers have clear policies, accessible to everyone, so all users know what to expect.
7) It recognises that people wanting single-sex services for reasons of privacy, dignity, safety or trauma have legitimate needs. It doesn’t call them bigots or transphobes, or accuse them of ignorance or bigotry.
What next?
Organisations should pay attention to this new guidance and revise their own policies.
We think EHRC should now update the statutory Codes of Practice to make it clearer and bring it into line with the Equality Act.
Has being part of Stonewall’s Diversity Champions programme - which is supposed to be about ‘inclusive workplace culture’ only - influenced the BBC’s output & style guide?
It would appear so: thetimes.co.uk/article/staff-…
“One of the big unanswered questions so far in this podcast is has Stonewall had an influence over the BBC’s editorial?”
‘We asked the BBC to explain to us how Stonewall’s position of having multiple genders in society had suddenly become the language of the BBC’s Education Department. They did not answer the specific questions.’
A transcript of the episode by @fairplaywomen fairplayforwomen.com/nolan-investig…
Erasing the word ‘mother’ from policies that affect only women & girls is not ‘gender-neutral’ but erases the significance of sex in the very area where sex is all important. Inclusive language doesn’t exclude the words women have used to describe themselves for centuries.
Without public debate, the Scottish Government has removed the word ‘mother’ from its maternity policies at the direction of Stonewall, the organisation that the Scottish Goverment is paying to lobby it to make such changes. archive.is/KxV2O
“Is it right that in a democracy a lobby group can have so much influence within government, on government policy and if Stonewall can have it who else can have it?” @StephenNolan
Nolan Investigates @stonewalluk: bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0…
Is your company a member of the Stonewall Diversity Champions scheme?
Sex Matters has found that Stonewall advice is often not in line with the Statutory Codes of Practice on implementing the Equality Act: sex-matters.org/posts/updates/…
Find our report
‘Understanding the risk of following Stonewall guidance – briefing for employers’
and all other Sex Matters publications here:
Any organisation considering whether they should stay in the @stonewalluk schemes should consider that they are not in line with the @EHRC employers code of practice.
Why take the risk of signing up to a scheme that is different from the law?
Christie Elan Cane says per case concerns "the community of non-gendered, non-binary and intersex persons and others whose gender identity is neither, or neither exclusively, male or female.”