@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp "in 1975 Charles Calisher, on a visit to Cuba took an interest in & obtained information on, the existence of antibodies to dengue in the Cuban population & the non-existence in the population, in at least 45 years, of antibodies for type 2 dengue virus" cuba.cu/gobierno/docum…
"As documented in Seymour Hersh’s “Chemical & Biological Warfare: America's Hidden Arsenal,” the U.S. has been experimenting with dengue lever since at least 1959, primarily at Fort Detrick & Walter Reed Army Institute"
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp Well, of course the US Government would wish to deny any such allegations and would use academics to do so, but it must be said that the US like the Soviets, had "form":
Chemical and Biological Weapons: Possession and Programs Past and Present
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp To continue, Ray Zilinskas (RIP) was one of the greatest experts in his field (biowarfare) and the full extent of his involvement with the US defence establishment can only be guessed at
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp However, that analysis failed to take into account US Intelligence (FBI) anti-soviet disinformation campaigns on chemical weapons "Operation Shocker", revealed by Cassidy, and bioweapons disinformation via double-agent Dmitri Polyakov
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp Polyakov was arrested by the KGB in 1986, six years after his retirement from the GRU. Later, it became clear that he was betrayed by both Robert Hanssen and Aldrich Ames. In 1988, Polyakov was sentenced to death for treason, and subsequently executed.
1. The US ran a 25 year disinformation campaign to convince the Soviets that it was developing chemical & biological weapons in contravention of the BWC Treaty.
More disturbingly in light of the above disinformation campaign, it is also clear that the US continued, and continues, to contravene the spirit of the BCW Treaty, by engaging in chemical and biological weapons research!
"Just a week before the September 11 terrorist attacks, American news media reported that the U.S. government had conducted clandestine research on biowarfare preparedness"
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp Here we are doing activities that, if we found out they were being done in Iraq or Iran or North Korea, we would probably immediately bomb the hell out of them."
"It makes it look like we're trying to get away with something,
"The Bush administration wiped out years of work on the BWC protocol by being the only signatory nation to reject the draft, on the grounds that surprise inspections could threaten national security or reveal drug companies' commercial secrets"
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp Of course, the US continues to claim its innocence, while running disinformation programs and secret projects. The US attempts to consign its deeply disturbing BW research to the autoclave of history.
Research programs at The National Biodefense Analysis & Countermeasures Center (NBACC) run by Battelle have generated controversy. Specifically, complaints that it possibly violateS tenets of the Biological & Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC)
"in 2005 the US CDC, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology & Mount Sinai School of Medicine synthesized the Spanish influenza virus responsible for the deaths of 50-100 million people"
Develop new pathogens, new ways of packaging & disseminating them, harden them to environmental degradation & be prepared to go offensive at the drop of a hat if we so desire"
"We can do whatever we want, but you can't. We want to see your biodefense program, but you can't see ours"
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp If you are curious, take time to read this report by Milton Leitenberg, which details the many ways in which the US, especially the CIA, has violated the BWC over the past decades up to now:
Biological Weapons & “Bioterrorism” in the 21st Century
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp Back to Ray Zilinskas who was concerned about the "Legacy of the Soviet Biological Warfare Program in Russia Today" and Putin's perceived ambitions.
1. We can't know whether new biological techniques developed since the Soviet BW program supposedly closed in 1993, have been applied by scientists working in the 3 top-secret MOD biological institutes to create new weaponized strains of bacteria & viruses
Although that more likely refers to hypersonic weapons, etc, it could also refer to genetic weapons (according to Zilinskas)
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp 3. There is great cause for concern that well-resourced secret Russian institutes with access to modern microbiology techniques will provide the basis for the Putin administration to establish a third-generation BW program—for two specific reasons.
@pathogenetics@Ayjchan@TheLancet@emilyakopp 4. Second, recipes generated by the second-generation BW program that specify how to develop, test, and produce biological weapons are deposited in government archives & could be adapted to develop payloads consisting of third-generation weaponized pathogens.
"it is imperative that the US and other BWC state parties try to impress upon the Putin government the need to practice transparency by opening its closed bioweapons institutes to outside access"
2. The whistleblower just testified that following pressure & interference from mid-level & senior CIA leadership, the team's lab-leak findings were suppressed.
3. On August 17, 2021, the team was forced to reverse its stance and officially submit a conclusion stating they were unable to determine the origin, which formed the basis of the declassified ODNI report released later that month.
This is GOF research via experimental adaptation increasing pathogenicity which is DURC because it involves a listed high-risk pathogen and increases virulence via serial passage in a key reservoir host. i.e. DUCKS!
The Jiangsu researchers deliberately turned a relatively mild H5N6 avian influenza virus into a highly lethal killer of ducks through repeated serial passage in duck cells and live mallard ducks.
3. Good opportunity to boost my Video from 2013!
What originally caused zero deaths in mallards was rapidly adapted into a strain causing up to 100% mortality, massive viral replication in organs, and severe disease..
2. Prof Peter Shields, Professor of Medical Oncology at Ohio State University
“This paper does not add anything we do not already know, but selectively cites studies (and omits many others that refute the authors statements throughout) that leads the reader down the wrong path"
3. Prof Peter Shields (2)
“None of their mechanistic studies (selectively cited) has been validated as actual risk predictors in people, and the authors failure to recognize that leads to harmful conclusions."
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place