As a result of the efforts of Raphael Lemkin, the term #genocide was included in the Indictment for the #Nuremberg Trials of 1945-46 under the category of War Crimes.
British deputy chief prosecutor Sir David Maxwell Fyfe used the term in June 1946 #Nuremberg during his cross-examination of Konstantin von Neurath, former Reich Protector of Bohemia and Moravia.
Maxwell Fyfe reminded Neurath that the prosecution was charging him and many of his fellow defendants with genocide, “which we say is the extermination of racial or national groups.”
He then cited Lemkin’s definition of genocide as “a coordinated plan” aimed at destroying the “essential foundations of the life of national groups” with the intention of “annihilating the groups themselves.”
Lemkin had argued in his 1944 work Axis Rule in Occupied Europe that #genocide entailed a wide range of techniques for group destruction, including attacking the intelligentsia, banning the use of native language in education, and siphoning off a group’s economic resources.
Maxwell Fyfe, during his cross-examination of Neurath, brought forward damning excerpts from a memorandum that Neurath had sent to Hitler in 1940, outlining the policies that he had introduced to suppress the Czech population.
In this memorandum, Neurath had advised the expulsion of all Czechs from Bohemia and Moravia who were not “suitable for Germanization,” including the entire educated class.
Neurath had also proposed measures such as “the extermination of the Czech historical myth” and a campaign against the use of the Czech language in order to erase Czech culture.
“You meant to destroy the Czech people as a national entity with their own language, history, and traditions, and assimilate them into the Greater German Reich,” Maxwell Fyfe charged.
For Maxwell Fyfe and for Lemkin the effort to destroy the Czech people as a national entity--the effort to destroy any people as a national entity--was an act of #genocide.
The "plan" put forward in the RIA-Novosti article is a plan for #genocide. Calls for the "deukrainization" of Ukraine are calls for #genocide.
Genocide can be prosecuted as a war crime (as it was at Nuremberg) or as a crime against humanity. Or it can be prosecuted on its own.
Plans for genocide, calls for genocide, acts of genocide all demand an immediate and robust response.
In his closing speech at the #Nuremberg Trials in 1946, British chief prosecutor Sir Hartley Shawcross used the term #genocide to describe the Nazis’ “deliberate and systematic plan” to wipe out peoples and cultures.
Shawcross revisited the evidence about the Einsatzgruppen and Auschwitz.
But he also reminded the Tribunal that #genocide had not been limited to the murder of Jews and Gypsies.
Shawcross emphasized that the Nazis had pursued genocide “in different forms” in Poland, the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, and Alsace-Lorraine.
The RIA-Novosti article--a horrifying treatise for #genocide--is a ramped-up and developed version of a "plan" for "deukrainization" advocated by the Russian economist and publicist Mikhail Khazin back in 2016.
Chilling to re-read Khazin's "vision" for a divided Ukraine. He had called for the transformation of Kyiv, Chernihiv, and Sumy into "agricultural hinterland stripped of industry and armed forces" with "excess population" deported to Russia's Far East.
Khazin had suggested that there would likely be "several million" Ukrainians who "cannot be reformed" and who would "need to be partly terminated, and partly expelled."
Yes, the word genocide was indeed created to describe what is now transpiring in Ukraine. And the term totalitarianism was invented to describe the kind of regime that is now in place in Russia.
To me, this much is obvious.
We've seen it before. I've spent my career as a historian studying it.
Yes, we will need war crimes trials and a new #Nuremberg to try the Putin regime, Putin's generals, and rank-and-file Russian soldiers.
Crimes against humanity as defined in the #Nuremberg Principles of 1946
"Atrocities and offenses, including but not limited to murder, extermination, deportation, imprisonment, torture, rape, or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population…”
Russia hasn't broken "western" rules of law. It has violated universal principles.
These were principles that the jurists and diplomats in the Russian Empire and in the Soviet Union had once had a major role in formulating.
On the morning of May 23, 1946, Soviet assistant prosecutor Nikolai Zorya was found dead in his hotel room in #Nuremberg. Zorya, below, had presented key parts of the Soviet case.
Zorya’s death was reported to Moscow as a suicide. In Nuremberg, the Soviets put forward another story: Zorya had accidentally shot himself while cleaning his gun.
No one really believed that Zorya’s death was an accident—especially in the wake of the public exposure of the secret protocols to the Soviet-German Non-Aggression Pact.
On May 22, 1946 the St. Louis Post-Dispatch published a full transcript of the secret protocols to the Soviet-German Non-Aggression Pact (Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact) of 1939, accompanied by an article by the paper’s #Nuremberg correspondent Richard L. Stokes.
Stokes explained that this “purports to be the authentic text of the famous ‘Secret Protocol’ for partitioning Poland and disposing of the Baltic states which was signed by Foreign Commissar V. M. Molotov and Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop at Moscow on... Aug. 23, 1939.”
Stokes further noted: “It is followed by an amendment transferring Lithuania to Russia with recompense for Germany in Poland which the same statesmen executed at Moscow on Sept. 28, 1939.”
Image of Molotov and Ribbentrop at the September 1939 meeting.