Yesterday I got locked out of tweeting after Twitter deemed a tweet of mine comparing current UK policy with GBD promoted policy violated twitter rules. So, I want to apologise to GBD promoters- I was wrong- what GBD promoted was much worse, because it was pre-vax and therapies🧵
I was too generous in my assessment - and I apologise for that. Clearly even that was enough to get me mass targeted. Now, that I've been 'cancelled' like certain GBD supporters, I expect that the Guardian, and Express will write pieces on how I've been 'silenced'... <sarcasm>
I'm standing by in case you want to reach out. I also hope that being 'cancelled' will now open up the world of writing op-eds for the Spectator, and being on Radio 4, and meeting with Rishi Sunak, and advising the PM. I can now truly get on the hot 'I've been cancelled' brigade.
Oh, and here's the rest of my thread from yesterday- about why mass infection is problematic even with boosters and antivirals. Please amplify #theyattackweamplify
I'm sure I'm going to continue to be mass-targeted. Being an outspoken brown woman challenging misinformation spread by fringe scientists furthered by vested interests will not go unpunished. So I expect there's more to come. But as I've said before, I'm not easily intimidated.
This has been my experience throughout- on twitter and IRL- outspokenness, and particularly challenging privileged men (& some women) makes you a target. But I made peace with that a while ago. I know this isn't a level playing field, & power gradients apply, as always.
There's a lot to say about the bias in Twitter's algorithms here too. It's interesting how often misinformation and direct harassment is given a free pass, with facts being targeted because of mass reporting. There's no transparency around how Twitter handles this.
Also, I note that despite applying for verification thrice, I'm still not verified. It's hard to justify this, in my view. I don't really care much about verification except to highlight that policies clearly don't apply to people equitably or transparently. Which is problematic.
So this is to all those amazing outspoken women out there- who keep going despite all the trolling, targeting, complaints to employers, attempts at intimidation. It's not an easy job- but it's vitally important. Don't stop what you do.
When I get trolled, and targeted, I know I'm seen by proponents of misinformation as a threat to the status quo. Which means I'm getting through at least enough for them to feel threatened. So I must be doing something right.
I also want to point to the numerous pieces about promoters of GBD being 'silenced' or 'cancelled' for just having different views. I think perhaps someone should write about how GBD supporters have consistently targeted & attacked those who've challenged their rhetoric.
I've had hit pieces written on me, and coordinated attacks on my account. Somehow that doesn't matter. It's hard to believe those who are constantly platformed on MSM are being 'silenced' even as their supporters target anyone who challenges them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Long COVID data just out from the ONS TL;DR
-1.7 million people now living with long COVID (28 day definition) - that's 1 in 37 people in the commiunity
-780,000 have had this for *more than a yr*
-at least 334000 got this during the omicron wave (impact since Feb not felt yet)🧵
There have been increases in *all age groups* during the omicron wave. Increases have been greatest in younger children (1.5 fold increase in 2-11 yrs in a *single month*). We now have almost 150,000 children with long COVID for 4 wks of whom 31,000 have had this for > 1 yr.
2.7% (1 in 37 people) of the general population has long COVID, but prevalence is higher among teaching staff, health and social care workers, those from more deprived areas, and those with baseline poor health and disabilities.
Don't get me wrong - boosters have had a huge impact but we're still seeing >1000 deaths/wk. And our NHS is overwhelmed- not just with COVID-19, but with the devastation of the past 2 yrs, and underresourcing of a decade. And HCWs having high levels of long COVID and burnout.
And everyone is vulnerable to long COVID- 'healthy' young people with mild infection. Yes, vaccination reduces risk, but doesn't eliminate it, and 20% of our population hasn't even had a single dose. Yes - children, who're suffering as a result.
'Focused protection' was always a lie. Because everyone is vulnerable to long COVID. And public health isn't about segregating groups - it's about community action. Anyone who understand infectious disease spread knows this.
This tweet is appalling on so many levels - but also maybe those concerned about lockdowns in Shanghai (nothing like Mariupol) should consider CV people here who've been forced into shielding forever. I've not met anyone outside immediate family for *2 yrs*. Not 16 days.🧵
I haven't been able to hug my own brother. And I know there are many others like me. This is what 'freedom' is for us.
Worth looking in the mirror before criticising others- especially if you're someone who backed a largely vaccine only policy.
Also, elimination saved a lot of lives. You can disagree with the way it's been done in some regions- but that's not the same as criticising zero COVID, which was successful in many countries, and there's no doubt it saved many lives until people could get vaccinated.
5 million people infected in the UK in the wk ending 26th March - the highest at any point during the pandemic.
1 in 13 people infected in England.
At this point, as testing ends, it's worth assuming that contacts at work/school/transport may be infected & acting accordingly.
I now assume that if I enter any indoor environment, the likelihood is high that someone infected has been through, and I wear an FFP2+ mask to protect myself & others. If I'm at home, I open windows & doors and put the HEPA air purifier on too.
It's frankly nuts that we've stopped testing at the point in time we've had more cases than ever during any point in the pandemic. Really points to the dystopian disconnect between reality and govt rhetoric.
Do you think human challenge studies of SARS-CoV-2 that cause smell disturbances in 83% of participants post-infection- with smell disturbances lasting for >4 wks in 61% and >6 months in 30% of participants are:
UK Human challenge study published in Nature Medicine today- with these outcomes. Who ethically approved the study?
The 'UKHSA’s Ad Hoc Specialist Ethics Committee'. It was not considered a clinical trial. nature.com/articles/s4159…
This is seriously concerning in my view. Given what we do and don't know about SARS-CoV-2 infection, this study raises serious ethical concerns. The proportion of participants affected longer term in this study is very concerning.
This is incorrect. S. Korea isn't an example of failure of suppression. S. Korea adopted 'living with it' in Nov last yr & continued to ease measures even as cases surged. This isn't a failure of suppression strategies- it's a failure of vaccine-only 'living with it' strategies.
It's disingenuous to use S. Korea as an example to suggest infection is inevitable. It isn't- the virus no matter how transmissible is ultimately transmitted via aerosols. Overwhelming evidence that high-grade masks & ventilation works. Vaccine only strategies are the real danger
There are still positive examples of suppression (e.g. Taiwan). It's interesting how S. Korea is being used to suggest that suppression strategies are failing, when S. Korea moved away from suppression months ago.