#RPVBooks sometimes I forget Jonathan Skinner’s brilliance. But as my reading notes of his book on participant observation indicate, the man is brilliant. In “The Interview: An Ethnographic Approach” Skinner edits a four part introduction to interviews as part of ethnography.
I’m a political scientist and a human geographer who uses ethnography as one of a suite of qualitative methods within a mixed methods framework. Obviously my training colours what I think and how I use what I read. I say this because reading this book shocked me.
Skinner writes in the introductory chapter that at a conference on anthropologists and the interview, someone told him: "I don't do interviews in my ethnographic fieldwork".
To me, it is possible to conduct an ethnography without interviews. But they *feel* intrinsic.
I'm not an anthropologist and I am not trained by an anthropologist or operate within the field per se (though I did attend and present at an economic anthropology conference and I do read anthropological literature). So to me, that phrase that Skinner mentioned sounds weird.
At any rate, this Skinner edited volume is phenomenal. There are theoretical, conceptual chapters that are intended to force the reader to have a conversation with themselves on how they see an interview, and how they might conduct an ethnographic interview. At the same time...
... you will find empirical chapters that describe the experience of ethnographers who conduct interviews within a multitude of settings.
What I find extraordinarily appealing is that even the conceptual chapters provide extensive transcripts of interviews conducted by authors.
I don't know Skinner personally so I have no way to know if he intended for the volume to be so pedagogical and instructive, but it turned out that way. Seems to me like a foundational volume for the entire ethnography community.
10/10 recommend
</end thread>
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: On writing about, thinking and teaching research methods.
I wrote a thread in Spanish last night on puzzles and how to craft research questions. I've written about this topic several times in English, and in Spanish, but not on the actual topic of "puzzles".
This thread is NOT about "puzzles" (I am preparing another one, in English, on this very topic). But the amount of reading I did to just feel BARELY that I had mastered the notion of why we teach students to write research questions based on puzzles was incredible.
There are multiple things I think about ALL THE FREAKING TIME: generalizability, reliability, reproducibility, transparency, research design, concept formation, theorization, ethics of research, fieldwork.
This, in addition to my substantive areas (comparative public policy,...
En la tarde voy a hacer un hilo sobre preguntas de investigación. Urge enseñar a identificar la pregunta de investigación y a seleccionar métodos que respondan a esa pregunta.
Obviamente que no me dió la vida para hacer este hilo ayer, pero ya me desperté y tengo mi cafecito, así es que voy a empezar a trazar alguna(s) posible(s) ruta(s) para construir preguntas de investigación, esperando les sea de utilidad. #RPVTips
Hay múltiples rutas para construir preguntas de investigación y distintos tipos de preguntas de investigación. Estoy escribiendo (terminando, si me da la vida) un libro sobre métodos de investigación en el que hablo en más amplitud de las clasificaciones de preguntas.
En la presentación del libro editado por @odmeza sobre asuntos públicos y la pandemia de COVID19 en la que participaron un número nutrido de profesores y profesoras de la División de Administración Pública del @CIDE_MX@CIDE_DAP@CIDE_RC
#RPVTipe I feel somewhat embarrassed to not have come across this book earlier in my career given the many, many books I’ve read on ethnography. Basically, Spradley does what I want to do with my own books: walk the newbie through the ropes: how do you capture data, analyze, etc
Having so many languages to choose from, Spradley chose to speak the truth. You can, in fact, learn ethnography and participant observation from the start, as a total newcomer. And his book helps the reader do exactly that.
Spradley writes in a very accesible style #RPVBooks
I found Spradley’s book not only incredibly insightful but also very didactic. Diagrams, tables, figures and guidelines all contribute to making it an easy choice for how to conduct ethnography, analyze the data y write up the results.
I need a hashtag to be able to find all my reading notes of the books I buy and read. So this is a #RPVBooks thread on Verlyn Klinkenborg’s “Several short sentences about writing” (book cover in the photo attached to this tweet).
An incredible book, extraordinary.
The core of Klinkenborg’s approach can be summarized as follows:
1) all the writing advice you read is regimented and can feel asfixiating 2) focusing on the sentence and the paragraph as the core units of writing allows you to break free from that feeling of constraint
3) writing can be fostered, encouraged, motivated and unleashed (my words) by NOTICING.
Klinkenborg’s approach is different from Stephen King, Anne Lamott, Eudora Welty and many other writers who write about writing.
Klinkenborg suggests that noticing and deconstructing …
Cuando estaba en el doctorado, una profesora que estudiaba agua empezó a publicar Bibliografías Anotadas sobre temas específicos, como si fueran productos académicos (coautoradas con sus estudiantes de posgrado). Siempre se me hizo raro. Qué valor tendrían éstos documentos?
Con el tiempo, y entre más tuve que leer sobre diversos métodos de investigación (cuantitativos, cualitativos, espaciales), me dí cuenta del verdadero valor de las Bibliografías Anotadas:
Alguien ya leyó y evaluó los materiales que estoy queriendo revisar, POR ESCRITO.
Además, con el tiempo (y entre más he enseñado métodos y técnicas de investigación), me he dado cuenta del valor de las Bibliografías Anotadas (Annotated Bibliographies) como precursores de la Revisión de la Literatura.
Por lo mismo, aquí va un #RPVTips sobre cómo hacer una B.A.