1/ 15 months ago I penned an article entitled "Welcome to the New Container Shipping Supercycle" questioning the premises of popular conceptions of supply and demand at the time.

Some reflections on what I got right and what I got wrong.

A 🧵...

seekingalpha.com/article/439810…
2/ New ship deliveries are not hard to predict 2 years into the future as it takes upwards of 18 months to build most ships from contract date. A dearth of new ordering through late 2020 ensured insufficient supply coming to market to through 2023 to meet demand.
3/ I was also correct that there was limited capacity to add additional megamax ships in 2024.

What I completely underestimated was the enormous demand and shipbuilding slot availability for new panamax ships in lieu of available megamax capacity.
4/ And although I also correctly predicted that it would take some time to develop new midsize designs, the demand and slot availability for these (in lieu of now full panamax capacity) once again surpassed expectations.
5/ The relentless hunting down and conversion of all available shipbuilding capacity to new boxships has taken most by surprise.

With a 25% orderbook it is far less certain that ship supply will remain tight into 2025 and hard to say what will happen with rates in '24 - '26
6/ FAR more interesting is what the implications are for the worlds other largest fleets #drybulk and #tankers whose order books are at multi decade lows and almost non existent deliveries scheduled for 2024.
7/ Monitoring delivery dates for newly contracted ships agrees with the anecdotal evidence from industry insiders suggesting that there is very little capacity for large ships of any type left in 2024:
8/ With impending EEXI carbon efficiency regulations greatly reducing effective fleet capacity beginning in 2023, it is becoming all but certain we see negative fleet growth in 2024 without extremely high rates to keep old inefficient ships out trading. splash247.com/less-than-25-o…
9/ Seeing as the commodities shipped on #drybulk and #tankers are very inelastic (people must eat and power homes) and the freight portion of landed cost low, I see commodity trade continuing to grow irrespective of the rising cost of freight due to a static or shrinking fleet.
10/ So although the #boxships outlook mid-decade is in question due enthusiastic ordering, it has made supercycle call on #tankers and #drybulk far easier and more certain than the one I made on boxships 15 months ago.
11/ To me it is no longer a question of if we will see high rates in the coming years, but more questions of how forward looking the market will be, what interim volatility looks like and what the size and likelihood of the tail risks are.
12/ I suspect the largest and highest quality names like $SBLK $GOGL $FRO $EURN will do very well in the coming years as a buy and hold barring the very real possibility of global recession.
13/ For those that take the time to understand the more idiosyncratic names in #tankers and #drybulk, can stomach the volatility, and manage the associated risk, I suspect there could be an opportunity for truly exceptional returns like those seen in #boxships in the last 2 years

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AllThingsVentured

AllThingsVentured Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AllVentured

Apr 17
1/ I'm going to pound the table a bit more about and show that shipbuilding capacity is insufficient to replace scrapping let alone accommodate trade volume growth.

But this time we will look at the global aggregate merchant fleet including all sectors.

🧵...
2/ Across all sectors, the global orderbook is only ~10% of the active fleet compared to ~8% that is already beyond economic life in the new high fuel cost/low emissions requirement paradigm. It the time it takes the ~10% to deliver, ~14% more will approach end of economic life. Image
3/ In 2022, ships reaching critical decision age whether to scrap or repair for compliance increases significantly and continues to increase each year this decade.

Notice in 2022 and beyond, the capacity of ships delivered fails to match capacity hitting the new 20 year wall. Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 9
1/ #Tankers are the biggest beneficiary of changing trade patterns due to Russian sanctions. PERIOD.

A look into why tanker rates are surging this week and why this is just the beginning.

A 🧵...
2/ The picture is becoming even clearer that Russian oil which used to go via pipeline and short sea to Europe will go all the way to China and **BACK** instead.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
3/ **BACK** from China? YES. The West is structurally short on refining capacity and the deficit is getting larger as Russian refining capacity becomes shut in and European refiners struggle to source the slate needed to run at full capacity. reuters.com/business/energ…
Read 16 tweets
Apr 3
1/ After the initial spike on the news of the Ukraine invasion tanker rates initially retraced due to lack of employment while Russian exporters sorted out details on who would buy the oil.

With buyers found, aframax and suezmax rates are moving higher again on tight ship supply
2/ Even the massively oversupplied VLCC fleet has seen an uptick in rates (to slightly less loss-making levels) on the burgeoning tightness in the market.

But until this excess capacity in VLCC is removed from the market rates for smaller classes are likely to remain capped.
3/ So the question is how quickly is supply coming back to the market and when can we expect this VLCC excess capacity to be absorbed?

I will attempt to put the monthly 400kb/d OPEC capacity increase schedule into context as it relates to seaborne volumes:
Read 10 tweets
Apr 2
1/ Simandou back on track with a new firm deadline to start shipping 3/31/25.

At 100MMt/yr it will be second only to Vale's S11D mine in its impact to seaborne ton miles.

There are not enough ships nor enough shipbuilding capacity through 2025 to accommodate this start date.
2/ Lets do some back of the envelope math:

Capesize round trip from Guinea to China around 110 days at 11kt = 3.3 trips per year.

To ship 100MM tons this distance you need an additional ~145 Newcastlemax ships. This is roughly equivalent to the ENTIRE orderbook today.
3/ But todays orderbook will be barely sufficient to keep up with the new normal of earlier demolitions let alone accommodate the massive growth coming from Simandou:
Read 6 tweets
Mar 13
1/ A reply to Alex Turnbull @alexbhturnbull on his Reply to Zoltan Pozsar.

Zoltan is spot on with his high ocean freight thesis. Alex's rebuttal that commodities will trade overland instead is a nice thought but it doesn't actually work that way.
2/ Zoltan recently published a piece titled "Bretton Woods III" hypothesizing among other things that if Russian commodities go to China instead of the West it would cause very high ocean freight rates.
3/ @alexbhturnbull's Substack reply to Zoltan:

"One of the big losers in all of this is likely to be freight shipping: as China is likely to trade more with Russia the appeal of overland transport is going to be significant here both to avoid detection and ensure capacity."
Read 13 tweets
Mar 1
1/ What do you get when you combine high fuel costs, impending emissions limitations starting in 2023, and record high scrap steel prices?

Large ships sold for scrap at much younger ages than usual despite an optimistic outlook on earnings.

Last week's demo sales per Advanced:
2/ It is no surprises to see large 18 and 19 year old tankers sold for scrap last week considering the weak rate environment but it is a bit of a surprise to see young capesize bulk vessels scrapped with rate futures expecting highly profitable rates in the balance of 2022:
3/ But I can't argue with the decision to sell an asset nearing the end of its life for more than double the scrap value that similar vessels fetched only 18 months ago.

That is nearly $15m of cash for each cape sold last week which can now be redeployed into a younger vessel.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(