The joint statement by @pritipatel and @Vbiruta in the Times this morning is a masterclass in lying and disingenuity. Not only does it rehash the tired, and demonstrably false, "economic migrants" and "queue jumpers" line, it also shows neither knows what trafficking is. 1/ 
Absolutely nobody is being "advantaged" by being trafficked. It is also the height of hypocrisy to claim you care whilst pushing policies which are 100% guaranteed to benefit actual traffickers. 2/
Oh, and by the way @pritipatel, we have all been telling you for a very long time how to tackle both trafficking and smuggling, but you haven't listened because it would also involve actually providing safety for asylum seekers instead of dumping them elsewhere. 3/
Removing carrier liability fines, so asylum seekers can fly, or catch a ferry or Eurostar, across the channel instead of having to use smugglers. Issue humanitarian visas so that it is harder for traffickers to prey on people. Facilitate easier access to the asylum system. 4/
Invest some of the hundreds of millions, soon to be billions, spent on "deterrents" in local communities to ensure they can be developed in parallel to benefit locals and asylum seekers alike. All of these would be more effective than shipping people 4,000 miles away. #r4today 5/
The #RwandaMigrationPlan won't be a "deterrent". First off, asylum seekers don't tend to know the asylum laws of countries they head to. Secondly, for those who do, people come to the UK primarily because of language or family ties, so likely to play the odds. #r4today 6/
We absolutely do know that the #RwandaMigrationPlan won't work #r4today. It has already been tried between Israel and Rwanda and led to a massive spike in trafficking, with zero impact as a deterrent. It is false to claim that we "can't know" until we do it. 7/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
