@AshwiniUpadhyay has argued that the Waqf Act is against the principle of secularism as well as unity and integrity of the country because there are no similar laws for followers of Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and other religions. #DelhiHighCourt#WaqfAct
Upadhyay: If the impugned act has been made to protect the rights of minorities then the act has to protect the rights of all the minorities not only the muslims. #DelhiHighCourt#AshwiniUpadhyay#WaqfAct
Upadhyay: The board has only muslim members who are paid from public exchequer. On the other hand, state collects over Rs 1 lakh crore from temples but there are no such laws for Hindus. #DelhiHighCourt#AshwiniUpadhyay#WaqfAct
Bench: You have not impleaded the waqf board even though you have challenged the waqf act. the body that is constituted under the act has to be there no?
Bench dictates order.
Order: Let the amended memo of parties be filed within a week. the petitioner has read out his short submission. Issue notice. Notice is accepted on behalf of R 1-3 by Kirtiman Singh.
Counsel: Office report says ... (Not clear) notice not issued to other respondents.
Counsel: These were proforma respondents
Counsel for respondents: They are entitled to, they have no objection
Counsel: No reason for other matter even be here.
Bench: Connected to the other matter or not?
Counsel: Charges framed in item 18. In this, May 2017, CBI framed certain aspects which were already enquired into and nothing was found. Magistrate interpreted your order saying no bar on further charges/investigations.
Delhi High Court will hear today a PIL challenging the provisions of recently promulgated Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022. #DelhiHighCourt#PIL
The act sanctions taking of body measurements of persons including finger-prints, palm-prints, foot-prints, photographs, iris and retina scan etc.
The PIL has challenged the Act on the grounds that it violates individual freedom and rule of law. #DelhiHighCourt
The petition will be heard by a Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Vipinn Sanghi and Justice Navin Chawla.
A Supreme Court bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai to hear petition by Jamiat Ulama I Hind against demolition drive in Jahangirpuri and other States.
Apart from the petitions by Jamiat Ulama i Hind seeking to quash demolition notice by NDMC in #Jahangirpuri and a direction to cease bulldozer politics, CPI(M) leader Brinda Karat has moved #SupremeCourt stating demolition did not even stop an hour after SC ordering status quo
Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, present in Court, agrees.
Court: We will list it on Tuesday, but death penalty and life sentence matters will take priority. Tuesday we will list the matter subject to availability.
Adv Shahrukh Alam who mentioned the matter before Delhi High Court on behalf of Jahangirpuri residents informs @barandbench that she will not be moving the petition in view of the SC's stay order. #DelhiHighCourt#JahangripuriRiots
Advocate Shahrukh Alam appears before the High Court and says the matter has been taken up by the SC therefore she will not be pressing the matter. #DelhiHighCourt#JahangripuriRiots