A Supreme Court bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai to hear petition by Jamiat Ulama I Hind against demolition drive in Jahangirpuri and other States.
Apart from the petitions by Jamiat Ulama i Hind seeking to quash demolition notice by NDMC in #Jahangirpuri and a direction to cease bulldozer politics, CPI(M) leader Brinda Karat has moved #SupremeCourt stating demolition did not even stop an hour after SC ordering status quo
Brinda Karat has also alleged that the demolition exercise was per se discriminatory since only Muslim homes were targeted @cpimspeak#SupremeCourt
Ganesh Gupta, whose juice shop was demolished in Jahangirpuri Demolition drive yersterday has moved #SupremeCourt seeking to refrain NDMC from carrying out the demolition process. Gupta maintains the shop area was allotted by @official_dda
Plea has been filed through @Vakeel_Sb
Senior Adv PV Surendranath mentions the plea by Brinda Karat
Sr Adv Surendranath: this is regarding the demolition
Justice LN Rao: submit when the matter is taken up
Dave: This was not done in 2002 then why now. Delhi has an act. particular section of society is being targeted. this is the warning constitutional framers gave us. they spoke about this eventuality.
Dave: they knew we will mention at 10.30 am and that is why demolition began at 9 am . they continued even after the status quo order was passed. this affects rule of law and there will be no democracy left.
Dave: how can BJP leader write a letter that you demolish and NDMC demolishes it. Delhi act has provision for notice and there is provision for appeals too. Look at the Olga Tellis case also and how SC protected the rights
Dave: Please see the preamble of the Delhi Municipality Act, where it is noted how there has been immense migration to Delhi and how changes have occurred beyond the Delhi Master plan
Dave: all homes in Jahangirpuri are more than 30 years old and shops are 50 years old. we are in a democracy and how can this be allowed in this country
SC: What you read now is about regularisation. come on encroachment now.
Dave: we have a right to first make correction in the record and then it says that no demolition will take place unless the person has been given a reasonable opportunity
Dave: these are poor people. If you want to remove encroachments come to sainik farms. Come to golf links where I stay and every second home is an encroachment somehwere, but you dont touch it at all
Dave: the leader wrote that some anti social elements pelted stones on the shobha yatra and that they have support from AAP leaders and that he wishes that homes of such people be bulldozed
Sibal: My plea is that such instances are happening in other states also. when processions are carried out and frictions occur, homes of only one community is bulldozed and politics in power judges what happens or not happens
Sibal: Look at Madhya pradesh where minister says that if muslims does such a thing they cannot expect justice. who decides that ? who gave him that power. somebody is in jail his house was demolished, somebody who raped their house also broken down
Sibal: encroachments is not limited to A community and B Community, you cannot demolish their houses and say that they encroached. it is not a forum for politics and this forum is to show that rule of law prevails.
SG Mehta: both pleas are by Jamiat ulama i hind and this is what happens when an organisation comes here. In Jahangirpuri the drive to remove the encroachments on footpath etc began on January 19, in february, then in March and then in April 19 it took place to remove garbage etc
SG Mehta: this is what happens when organisation comes here suddenly. I will show you instances when notice is not required and illegal structures were given the notice. traders have moved HC last year and HC had itself ordered demolition
SG: this is why the organisations have come here and not individuals since they have to show the proof and it can be seen notices was issued. In Khargone demolition, 88 affected parties were Hindus and 26 were Muslims. this is the subject matter of debate. notices were in 2021
SG: Khargone orders were passed for demolition in 2021 and 2022. this has become like a pattern that is why instead of individuals approaching the court, organisations jump in. #SupremeCourt#jahagirpuri#जहांगीरपुरी#Bulldozer
SG: In notice section nothing applies to building materials, commissioner also may in discretion remove stalls, chairs, tables etc without notice.
SC: We want affidavits from the petitioner on the notices if served and counter affidavits and till then status quo order will continue.
SC: We will take a serious view of the demolition which was carried out even after supreme court orders even after NDMC Mayor was informed. we will take that up later #SupremeCourt#jahagirpuri#जहांगीरपुरी#Bulldozer
Sibal: but does it mean bulldozing happens in other states
SC: You have informed us what has happened and you dont want it to read. Once we have passed orders in one case you still think something will happen again?
Counsel: Office report says ... (Not clear) notice not issued to other respondents.
Counsel: These were proforma respondents
Counsel for respondents: They are entitled to, they have no objection
Counsel: No reason for other matter even be here.
Bench: Connected to the other matter or not?
Counsel: Charges framed in item 18. In this, May 2017, CBI framed certain aspects which were already enquired into and nothing was found. Magistrate interpreted your order saying no bar on further charges/investigations.
Delhi High Court will hear today a PIL challenging the provisions of recently promulgated Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022. #DelhiHighCourt#PIL
The act sanctions taking of body measurements of persons including finger-prints, palm-prints, foot-prints, photographs, iris and retina scan etc.
The PIL has challenged the Act on the grounds that it violates individual freedom and rule of law. #DelhiHighCourt
The petition will be heard by a Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Vipinn Sanghi and Justice Navin Chawla.
Senior Advocate Indira Jaising, present in Court, agrees.
Court: We will list it on Tuesday, but death penalty and life sentence matters will take priority. Tuesday we will list the matter subject to availability.
Adv Shahrukh Alam who mentioned the matter before Delhi High Court on behalf of Jahangirpuri residents informs @barandbench that she will not be moving the petition in view of the SC's stay order. #DelhiHighCourt#JahangripuriRiots
Advocate Shahrukh Alam appears before the High Court and says the matter has been taken up by the SC therefore she will not be pressing the matter. #DelhiHighCourt#JahangripuriRiots
Plea by Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind against employing bulldozers to raze down houses of persons suspected to be involved in criminal incidents such as #JahangirpuriClash mentioned before CJI NV Ramana led bench