1/ Happy Tweetorial Tuesday from @ChrisDJacksonMD!

Clinical pearls? Evidence based medicine? Are we trying to mix oil and water?

Don't worry, your #MedEdTwagTeam crew is here to help with this week's thread!
2/ The clinical pearl bridges our learner's clinical observations and their developing evidence-based practice.

Our learners are often navigating so much clinical data that a well-timed and well-crafted pearl can help them navigate challenging dx & mgmt scenarios
3/ Clinical pearls have 3 important qualities.

They convey a key easily understood clinical point. This information could inform dx, mgmt, or both. Most important, they should build the knowledge of the receiver, pointing out what is not already known.
4/ The teaching of clinical pearls is not perfect

Presenting teaching points with qualifiers of ALWAYS or NEVER can misrepresent the reality of clinical practice. Some pearls don't withstand scientific rigor. Lastly, pearls with no clear point can confuse learners.
5/ How do we reclaim the pithiness of the clinical pearl while keeping it scientifically sound and effective in teaching future generations of clinicians?
6/ Listed below are some of the clinical pearls repeated multiple times throughout my training. Over the next few slides, I'll share a framework and illustrate how to be more thoughtful in how we discuss pearls on rounds.
7/ Here is my framework for teaching clinical pearls to my learners.
8/ Prime your learners to use pearls with caution. Pearls should be used in specific contexts and they do not replace your clinical judgment. Much like a stethoscope, a clinical pearl is only as useful as the clinician applying it to a patient scenario.
9/ Context is everything. For each of the pearls above, they do have merit in specific clinical situations. Providing learners the appropriate context for the pearl allows them to incorporate these observations in their developing illness and management scripts for diagnoses.
10/ After giving the pearl, it's important to have the learner operationalize its meaning. Most pearls have both a dx and tx implication. More important than the pearl is the learner's understanding of how it impacts the patient scenario in question.
11/ Pearls are not eternal. I encourage and model confirming pearls in real-time. This confirmation can be searching MKSAP, UpToDate, or ACP Journal Club based on the nature of the pearl. I have the learner do it with me, or I ask them to search and report back the next day.
12/ Your clinical pearls need to serve a purpose to have the most impact. As I listen to a learner present a case, I try to think of the 3 questions below when I formulate a pearl. Grounding the pearl in one of these questions is the hook to engage your learner about a point.
13/ Please join us next week as @JenniferSpicer4 introduces teaching clinical reasoning.

You can find our previous threads by following @MedEdTwagTeam

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christopher D. Jackson, MD

Christopher D. Jackson, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisDJacksonMD

Feb 22
1/ Happy #TweetorialTuesday from @ChrisDJacksonMD!

Hypothesis-driven history? Bedside rounds? How do we put it all together?

Don't worry, your #MedEdTwagTeam crew is here to help with this week's thread! Image
2/ Last week, we emphasized the why of teaching and using hypothesis-driven history. Image
3/ Outlined in this figure are the 5 steps in a hypothesis-driven-history encounter

Depending upon the patient scenario, you may use some or all of these steps.

More important, though, is engaging the learner at each point towards obtaining the diagnosis for the patient Image
Read 18 tweets
Jan 5, 2020
Hey #medtwitter! I am giving a go at my first #MedEd #Tweetorial! I want to review my top 10 trials of 2019 inspired by my talk @UTHSC_Medicine on 2019 GIM updates. Thanks to @cjchiu for the inspiration and encouragement to do this!
1) POC CRP to Guide Antibiotic Treatment for COPD trial:
- RCT of 636 patients with GOLD stage II COPD seen at 86 clinics for AECOPD
- 20.4% absolute difference in self-reported abx use with no difference in COPD-related health at 4 weeks
- Maybe a CRP a day keeps the abx away
POC CRP to Guide Antibiotic Treatment Limitations:
- May not be generalizable to patients with more advanced COPD
- Bias reporting by patients
- Not all places have POC CRP available
- Read more here: nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(