They advertise as “a student society giving comprehensive and inclusive sex and relationship education to schools”
Teachers can request that these university students come into the classroom, or youth and sport groups, to deliver this training. If there are no groups near your school, check again later as more and more are popping up, they tell us.
We wanted to know what exactly they were ‘teaching’ but access to their curriculum page is limited and doesn’t provide much detail about content. sexpression.org.uk/curriculum/
They claim the only treatment for gender dysphoria is transitioning. This is incorrect and a dangerous message to be promoted to children in school. #CassReview
As we looked further we realised that they are wholly lacking in appropriate safeguarding training to be proving the service they are. They have 1 day of training before being allowed to provide information to children and teachers.
We thought we would continue to look further and were astonished to find the promotion of Alok Menon on their public Instagram page. The 2nd picture is a reminder of what Alok has said about children.
@AcrossParents spoke to @ScotExpress about a school promoting Alok and the inappropriateness considering his comments. We find it appalling an org going into schools would advertise Alok. The lack of training becomes more evident and worrisome. scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/…
Further digging led us to these pictures. Again, on their public page.
A reminder that they advertise for being for primary schools.
We are unable to identify which schools specifically they have been in because teachers appear to make the referrals and there is no record or list that we can source.
Parents don’t appear to have been told either.
We are seriously concerned that organisations which have not been consulted with parents are being given access to children in this way.
They are promoting affirmation, sexually inappropriate images, and safeguarding risks.
🧵: The Scottish Parliament Public Petitions Committee have published the responses to our petition to withdraw the 'Supporting transgender young people in schools' guidance from Scottish schools:
We’re disappointed that the Committee have not approached any of the organisations we recommended, like @ForWomenScot@Transgendertrd or @BayswaterSG instead going back to those who were involved in producing the guidance in the first place - a case of marking their own homework?
LGBT Youth Scotland have stated that “neither the Cass Review nor NHS England has any significance to the provision of educational materials in Scotland.” The wording in the submission from NGICNS is virtually identical.
We’ve been contacted by teachers about the recent briefing from EIS.
They have expressed concern about the lack of evidence, nuance and context within the briefing, and are worried about the impact this will have on children, families & teachers.
One of the concerns they have is the reliance of EIS on the EHRC Technical Guidance for schools, via the Supporting Transgender Pupils guidance by @scotgov
They told us they know this guidance is out of date due to the evolving policy area around this issue, and is under review/
We wrote to @HumzaYousaf during his leadership campaign to ask him to clarify his position on a number of areas concerning the teaching and promotion of gender identity ideology within Scottish schools, and the school guidance.
Boys & girls, regardless of how they id, must be excluded from the opposite sex spaces & services.
Legal arguments around GRC’s are not applicable to school aged children because they’re currently not eligible to apply for one.
3 @ForWomenScot sought a legal opinion from KC Aidan O’Neill on the provision of single sex toilets in schools. His advice was that schools are breaching their duty under the EqA to prohibit harassment related to pupils’ sex, by failing to use the single sex exceptions in the Act
We have been following the media coverage surrounding @ScotGovFM and her struggles to settle on appropriate pronouns for a male rapist.
When questioned for using ‘she’ for this ‘individual’, Nicola said too much shouldn’t be read into this.
We beg to differ: 🧵
We made a space for parents and teachers to share theirs and their children’s experiences of how gender identity ideology was impacting them in Scottish schools sosscotland.com/testimonies
They are not being afforded the same leniency as our FM.
An S2 boy feels unable to express his discomfort about being pressured after a school assembly to ‘identify however he wanted’.
He was scared the school would be angry if he said anything. He felt intimidated by other pupils too.
It is concerning that staff of the charity @LGBTYS, who provide training to schools & sit as partners for the national anti-bullying agency, Respect Me, are uncritically showing solidarity with the charity Mermaids, who are under investigation for #SafeguardingFail’s
This isn’t just a rogue worker, several others appear to agree.
We would have assumed that best practice for an influential organisation like LGBTYS would be to wait for the investigation to be conducted & confirmation that risk of harm has been mitigated.
Vulnerable young people use the chat function to speak to youth workers at LGBTYS, & I think we can assume that the signposting to Mermaids will continue, after seeing this show of solidarity, despite the concerning #Safeguarding risks being investigated. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-630816…