Some quick thoughts on the strategic Lansdowne leak today. #Ottawa#Ottnews
1) City Report still isn’t out, we had to get the OSEG report from journalists, and a week to consider this not ideal.
2) The transportation to and from this site remains a critical element not fixed
3) The 1200 units proposed have not been planned based on the site itself but there to help the $330M financial deal - tax increment financing (city debt to help pay for facilities which is purportedly paid back by future tax uplift from units instead of going to city wide tax).
4) Some positive aspects to this project- some housing on the site (need more truly affordable housing-TBD in this plan), smaller retail, a better waterfall for the city and public realm improvements. Important to do consultation and get real input but let the next council decide
5) 720 parking spaces is a lot to add to an already challenged site. This is an area that is highly walkable and essentially a 5 minute community. Minimal or 0 parking is completely reasonable here
6) The public greenspace should be maintained and let people walk on the roof
7) We need to see improvements to the public side of Lansdowne. The park amenities, expanded play structures, better canal access, splash pad, winter family activities, better active transportation connections and stop the cars from driving end to end through the site.
8) We are going to hold a community discussion on this on Mon May 2nd at 7pm (shawnmenard.ca/lansdowne2_con…). The plan should be put out for consultation but not be approved in principle or otherwise by a council that will look drastically different in just a few months #Ottnews
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When will residents of #Ottawa stop being lied to by authorities?
We are hearing over and over again that enforcement is taking place but that is clearly, and verifiably, a lie. #OttawaOccupied#Ottnews
In some cases this is in real time, where the evidence to refute what is being said is displayed for all to see.
In some cases we are seeing active facilitation by authorities of illegal activities (such as new encampments, fuel resupply, allowing vehicles back in to occupy)
We have also heard conflicting statements that this was remarkably peaceful, and then that enforcement would lead to violence, and then when bare minimum enforcement was done there was no violence. So what is actually going on here? What is the truth?
In the absence of any clear plan communicated to residents, here is what I would suggest needs to occur: 1) Every action should be geared towards protecting the residential areas of #Ottawa, stopping the noise, violence and harassment people are enduring
2) Begin ticketing and towing existing vehicles that are part of the convoy parking illegally in our residential areas, when it is safe to do so. 3) Allow for protest on Wellington and in the Parliamentary precinct and begin cordoning off for people in that vicinity
4) Protect residents accessing services both through community support. Don’t engage the convoy occupation but protect one another from harassment defensively 5) The city should have a court injunction for removals from residential areas
This is important for #ottnews media and #Ottpoli candidates because I’ve been seeing it mentioned repeatedly. The transit budget is not 50/50 (fares/transit levy). The operating budget is nearly $700 M. In “normal” years we collected $200 M in fares. Lately, we collect much less
This is important as people debate lower cost or #FreeTransit. We’ve been collecting about 1/5th of normal fare volume. Think about that. We are already so close to free transit, it’s a low fraction of the operating budget. $40 million? For universal transit in #Ottawa? Wow.
There are caveats of course. This includes other orders of gov compensation during the pandemic. But the point is, with operational funding now being discussed at the federal level, and as a powerful call to meet climate, equity and congestion objectives, this is achievable.
Voting records matter. Let’s take a trip down memory lane on now uncontested appointment, candidate Sudds. 1) Voted to give a Porsche dealership a $2.9 million tax break. 2) Didn’t want to use the word ‘emergency’ when it came to homelessness in Ottawa, while sitting as CPS chair
3) Voted to massively expand Ottawa’s sprawl, despite claiming to care about the environment. 4) Voted not once but twice to just accept the new design for the Chateau Laurier without pushing for more changes.
5) Voted to try and ensure that the Mayor did not have to meet with Indigenous leadership regarding the Taggart Tewin lands expansion. 6) Voted for more sprawl despite staff opposition to new lands, lobbied by Taggart