Australia has been singled out by Transparency International for ‘systemic failings in tackling public sector corruption’.
Morrison government rorts have gone beyond individual scandals to become something far worse - the strategic wrecking of our system of government:
🧵#auspol
In a previous thread I argued that Morrison & co are ‘wrecking crew’ politicians, actively trashing expectations of government and the idea of the public good.
In this thread, I’ll argue that rorting is core ‘wrecking crew’ behaviour.
Let’s start with definitions.
According to the @MacqDictionary, ‘rort’ is Australian slang that means ‘to swindle or dupe’.
Typically, ‘a rort is all about manipulating the system to gain a wrongful advantage’: macquariedictionary.com.au/blog/article/7…
A basic principle of our system of government is that public resources and institutions should not be manipulated to give ‘wrongful advantage’ either to political parties, or to individual politicians.
When that happens, rorting has occurred.
The crucial point here is that government resources and institutions exist to serve the public good - rather than the partisan interests of political parties, or the private interests of politicians.
It is vital that our politicians understand and respect the distinction.
As eminent Australian corruption fighter Tony Fitzgerald said some years ago, our ‘system takes it for granted that political power will be exercised by people who know how to behave properly and can be trusted to do so’: abc.net.au/news/2017-07-1…
Because our system assumes that our politicians will both understand and abide by the rules and conventions of our system of government, we are used to thinking about rorts as aberrant lapses in standards of public conduct.
But let’s go through the looking glass…
What if we instead think about rorting as part of a willful wrecking crew behaviour?
When seen this way, widespread rorting is revealed as contributing to an extreme, deliberate and ideologically driven effort to permanently malform how Australia is governed.
The ideology of rorting is gross self-interest.
No respect for rules that benefit everyone if you can get away with it.
Everyone for themselves.
Dog eat dog.
Winner takes all.
Everything up for grabs.
Truth doesn’t matter if you can get away with it.
Sounding familiar?
The implicit aims of rorting - if seen as part of a deliberate approach to government - are corrosively anti-democratic:
Concentrate power.
Reduce transparency & accountability.
Diminish norms of public integrity.
Capture public resources.
Poison the idea of the public good.
So, rorts are a perverse ‘win-win’ for wrecking crew politicians: the rorters both get their hands on public assets for private or partisan gain; and they effectively weaken trust in government and belief in the concept of the public good.
Now the detail…
Journalists have alleged and documented a large number of instances of Morrison government politicians intentionally manipulating public resources and institutions to achieve wrongful advantage.
Let’s consider a few examples through the wrecking crew lens:
In the Sports Rorts, Car Park Rorts and Community Grants Rorts affairs, when it appeared that public monies were blatantly allocated for partisan advantage, significant damage was done to norms of public conduct. @MichaelPascoe01 is a great read on this: thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/…
@MichaelPascoe01 nailed the corrosive effect of Sports Rorts on the idea of the public good:
'Scott Morrison told Australia there was absolutely nothing wrong with corrupting community sports grants for partisan political purposes': thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/…
Manipulating parliamentary travel allowances to achieve wrongful gain or advantage is another of the commonest rorts.
For example Scott Morrison and Josh Frydenburg charged taxpayers for a private jet to Lachlan Murdoch's Christmas party: theguardian.com/australia-news…
As @NickFeik later wrote, the reactions were revealing:
‘How did we get to the point where the misuse of public money by our two most senior politicians provoked neither contrition nor embarrassment, and it scarcely even registered as a scandal?’: themonthly.com.au/issue/2021/feb…
The widespread use of government advertising can also be considered a rort because of the way in which the system is being used to obtain political advantage.
For example, the Morrison government spending millions on advertising climate action - when they have no actual credible plan or mechanism for getting to net zero emissions - is little better than partisan propaganda damaging public trust in government: theguardian.com/media/2022/feb…
Another common species of rort are the so-called ‘jobs for mates’ political appointments.
In an earlier thread I explained how this specifically diminishes public trust and contributes to the ‘wrecking crew’ agenda:
In some instances, entire parliamentary processes have been co-opted for narrow partisan political advantage - which damages public trust in our parliament itself.
Remember Tim Wilson’s dodgy parliamentary inquiry… into opposition policy? theguardian.com/australia-news…
There are so many more alleged rorts, it is genuinely difficult to keep track.
Drawing on the work of mdavis.xyz satirists at @chaser set out to provide their own 'complete list': chaser.com.au/national/an-ex…
Scale is very important here.
To again quote @NickFeik ‘scandals are nothing new in Australian politics, but the way they have piled up in the recent years of coalition government points to a critical shift in our governance’: themonthly.com.au/issue/2021/feb…
Writing for @crikey_news, @BernardKeane has argued that the cumulative impact of the pattern and scale of dishonesty and rorting is part of ‘a coherent whole: a political style designed to avoid responsibility‘: crikey.com.au/2021/11/29/sco…
@AMTiernan wrote a fantastic piece in @GriffithReview warning that the scale of the Morrison government's ‘flagrant abuses of and disregard for traditions and conventions’, meant that this could become ‘normalised as the way politics is done’: griffithreview.com/articles/power…
…And that takes us to the crunch.
The ideological functioning of widespread rorts accompanied by an attitude of impunity is to normalise the capture of public institutions and resources for private and partisan gain, destroying public trust and the very idea of the public good.
Remember, the aim of ‘wrecking crew’ politics is that the whole idea of government is damaged and discredited. People stop believing in the power of government to do helpful things - and may even stop believing in the whole idea of the public good: crikey.com.au/2021/12/02/cri…
Infamously, Morrison refuses to support an ICAC with teeth.
According to former judge Anthony Whealy, ‘with a litany of scandalous rorts identified in audit reports, this government wishes to avoid proper scrutiny and being held publicly accountable’: theguardian.com/australia-news…
The Morrison government has even slashed the budget of those existing institutions designed to deliver checks and balances.
As @knausc reported, key federal integrity bodies have suffered direct cuts to their funding: theguardian.com/australia-news…
And, the impact is clear:
In January this year, Australia plunged to its worst ever score in Transparency International’s global Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI): theguardian.com/world/2022/jan…
Then came the follow up report warning that Australia was a ‘country to watch’ - a list that also includes Russia, Lebanon and Kazakhstan: transparency.org/en/blog/cpi-20…
I am an environmentalist.
I have written this thread, because the failure of government integrity is closely connected to the climate and ecological crises. I will go into this further in subsequent threads.
Rorting politicians delude themselves that everyone is in it for themselves.
This is not true.
Australia depends on dedicated people in all walks of life being committed to something greater than self interest - the public good
This is our true nature. australiaremade.org/introducing-th…
Turmoil at @AGLAustralia reached new levels this week, with major and costly power outages, and @mcannonbrookes buying a major shareholder stake and opposing demerger plans.
How has $AGL - a company with such an incredible history - reached this crisis point? 🧵: #ausbiz
To start, a reminder - @AGLAustralia is our country’s biggest climate polluter. $AGL alone is responsible for almost a tenth (over 8%) of our annual domestic greenhouse gas emissions. To protect our climate it is imperative AGL shifts its business model.
There has been ample opportunity for $AGL to transition its business model away from the destruction of our planet. Instead, AGL has resisted change and ignored the clear shift in the global energy market, consumer expectations - and the scientific warnings.
This week EVs emerged as a key #election2022 issue.
Australia is a terrible global laggard on electric vehicle uptake.
And if we stick with the current ‘strategy’ of @ScottMorrisonMP’s we are going to stay that way. Here's why🧵: #auspol
First, the Morrison government has refused to implement fuel efficiency standards, requiring cars to become cleaner over time. This is a tried and tested EV uptake tactic & the bare minimum - adopted by more than 80% of the global vehicle market: abc.net.au/news/2021-10-1…
Thanks to these lax environmental standards - which have been called out by global auto-makers time and time again - there is no reason for manufacturers to ship to Australia, and no reason to invest at home: abc.net.au/news/science/2…
This week the Morrison government appointed a bunch of ‘mates’ to key statutory positions. Much of the commentary has focused on nepotism - which is fair enough because it is pretty revolting.
But I reckon this is just another step in a deliberate wrecking agenda 🧵: #auspol
First, some background. This week the Morrison government was criticised for appointing ‘mates’ to key public service positions. Some former Coalition MPs & staffers were given high-paying jobs on the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, for example: sbs.com.au/news/article/g…
This is not the first time the Morrison government (and previous governments) have done this. @crikey_news has been particularly vigilant in covering the issue. Here’s another five handed out by Christian Porter when he was Attorney General, for example: crikey.com.au/2020/12/21/aat…
Yesterday, UN chief @antonioguterres singled out Australia as a climate action ‘holdout’ in the wake of the #IPCCReport & its call to urgently speed up emissions cuts.
Why? World leaders are fed up with @ScottMorrisonMP's ruinous history of inaction & blocking progress:🧵#auspol
There is a long, dismal history of the Morrison ‘blocker’ government.
Basics first. The biggest cause of the climate crisis is the mining & burning of coal, oil & gas.
The govt has zero plans to actively phase out these polluting fossil fuels: google.com/amp/s/theconve…
When exports & what is burned at home are combined, Australia is the world’s fifth-worst polluter. Morrison’s refusal to commit to phasing these out, in line with the IEA & IPCC calls means we are making an oversized contribution to climate change: theguardian.com/environment/20…
Overnight, #IPCCReport WG3, the 3rd volume in the blockbuster trilogy of global climate reports was released.
This one focuses on solutions and has some clear messages for Australian politicians.
Spoiler alert: @ScottMorrisonMP's track record comes out looking very bad. 🧵#auspol
For context, WG1 updated the physical science while WG2 outlined the climate change impacts we are already experiencing, and can expect in the future. Think of it as volume one on what is happening, volume two on how bad it is, and volume three on our last best chance...
Second piece of context. Last year, leaked documents revealed that the Australian government actively lobbied to have findings from this very report suppressed to avoid admitting the need to phase out coal. unearthed.greenpeace.org/2021/10/21/lea…
As we face more devastating east-coast floods, much of the commentary on the government’s abandonment of impacted communities has focused on @ScottMorrisonMP’s character & obsession with image management.
I reckon there's more going on - a deliberate wrecking agenda 🧵#auspol
A decade or so ago, US commentator Tom Frank coined the idea of ‘wrecking crew’ politicians who - perversely - deliberately or recklessly seek to govern badly in order to advance an extreme ideological agenda: tcfrank.com/product/the-wr…
As @crikey_news correspondent-at-large Guy Rundle has noted, Scott Morrison has pioneered his own version of destructive ‘wrecking crew’ politics in Australia: crikey.com.au/2021/12/02/cri…