Valeura Energy $VEl #VLU is a deep value case that is likely to re-rate. Before the recent acquisition $VLE had cash on hand 40m$ which is equivalent of 0.58CAD/share and a huge deep tight gas asset in Turkey. In this thread I will explain why I am buying $VLE shares.
Here is an overview of the transaction. $VLE acquire Thai oil asset from bankrupt KrisEnergy for $3.1m initial payment. The Wassana oilfield is expected to produce 3000 bopd after reactivation, field was shut-in during 2020 oil-crash. After reactivation 9m$ quarterly CF expected.
The Tax losses are the key for the transaction which make $VEL keep ~62% of profit. Assuming 100$ oil sell price -> 62$ CF. 2P case 4m barrels. Acquisition and Capex cost: 3+2+9.2+30m for 5 infill wells -> 11$/barrel. So we look 50$ net profit per barrel. 4m barrels -> 200m$
The webcast on the following link is very good to get further info. I think $VEL will growth further in Thailand and a 40m$ Mcap seems way to cheap given strong cash position and growth perspective. Would not be surprised if $VEL can grow to 10k bopd. #VLU
$VLE are also looking for a new Farm-in partner for the huge Deep Tight Gas asset. Former partner Equinor ditch the project during the low gas price times. European gas prices have increased a lot in the last year and interest for the asset has picked up again. #VLU
Just looking at the $VEL assets and the cash in hand. To me a 100-200% re-rate would still make this look rather low priced. Auctus Advisors gave $VEL #VLU target price of 2.09CAD which is roughly 200% upside from here.
Graph looks very good, break-out on high volume. Zoom out and you understand what can happen if a new farm-in partner for Turkey get announced. #VLU $VEL
$VEL buying interest remain strong but could come a dip to buy. #VLU trading also to resume at some point that can create volatile but have not seen a date for this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Very grateful for all the good interactions I got with the investor community on X. For new followers I will give some examples in below thread what kind of analysis / stock picking that you can get inspiration through following this account. Retweets appreciated. 1/x
Andean Precious metals $APM.TO
Highlighting it at 0,6CAD in below thread, it has lately traded between 8-12CAD. 2/x
Orvana $orv.to was under pressure lately and I have been adding to my position and it is now my largest position. I will explain in below thread how I think each of their 3 assets individually easily can underpin the current mcap. Overall 105k AUEQ producer for 184m$ mcap 1/x
Orevalle Spain ~40k AUEQ production. AISC in the last quarter 2350$. Asset got a long LOM and continue to find more gold. 40k*2000$-> Cash flow 80m$. Assume 60m$ FCF after tax. So based on 1 of 3 asset we got FCF yield on mcap of 35% for $orv.to 2/x
So how much gold does Orvana actually got in Spain. Below is 2024 reserves/resources and combine that with current exploration efforts and you realize that this mine is long LOM 15-20y. With higher gold the potential to grow production is material. 3/x
I have bought into a new high conviction gold mining play Asante Gold $ASE.v. Ramping up to 400k oz gold production in 2026 and later 500k oz in 2028. Mcap ~1,3bn USD. With current gold price you look at yearly operational cash flows of size similar as mcap . 1/x
2025 Asante suffered from high costs due to a lot of waste mining and delays. Share price was under pressure from need to bring in capital, delays and additional PP at low price. Ghana will also likely increase royalties by 5%. This caused share price to lag the gold price. 2/x
A Grok search says 400k oz gold producers are typically valued at 4-10bn usd. But Asante mcap is roughly 1,3bn usd with 300m usd debt and a rather small gold stream. To put in perspective another African 400k oz producer Allied Gold was bought earlier this week for 4bn usd. 3/x
Cerrado Gold $CERT.v webcast link this is probably the company that I am must excited about short term although Q3 financials were not great. I will explain below 1/xedge.media-server.com/mmc/p/cgg4zi3s
$Cert.v Achived gold price lag behind but from year end there is no more hedging. I created a simplified model below to show how operating cash flow will increase. With increasing production and margins expanding we are looking at doubling of operational cash flows. 2/x
Q3-25 included a larger tax payment as it became clear that MDN need to start paying taxes due to increased profitability and that it already used up accelerated amortization. Going forward I think we can assume 25-30% tax on AISC margin. 3/x
$CERT.v is ramping up to 5-6k oz per month. What does this mean going into 2026? AISC expected 1500-1800$/oz. Assume they sell gold at 4000$ or 3500$ in case a gold price correction. It still means we can expect roughly 2000$/oz margin. At 60k oz that is 120m$ operational CF 1/x
$CERT.v recently expanded their drilling program at MDN aggressively. One of the reasons to do this is that they got low utilized capacity at their CIL plant. The heap leach operations will deliver 40-50k oz per annum in the next years but the CIL plant could also do 50k oz. 2/x
This means that if the exploration at MDN turn out very successful $CERT.v might not just be able to extend LOM, they might also be able to ramp up production further and significantly add to that project 120m$ operational CF. Mcap is just 138m$ and soon debt free. 3/X
The main strategy I have been running this year is to focus on a few miners that got very high FCF vs. Mcap, LOM extension potential and growth potential. Sooner or later the market wake up to high FCF vs. Mcap, high FCF give money for exploration / growth and news flow increase.
I heard all arguments on low LOM, bad assets, bad Management etc. But FCF rules together with right assets and technical teams. As an anecdote $vle.to CEO had very bad reputation before the Thai acquisitions and many Investors missed out despite seeing good Cash flows, assets etc
By looking at high FCF vs. Mcap rather than high NAV vs. Mcap you get better risk/reward. Since I estimate the probabilty of success to be much higher for a company that got strong FCF vs. having a poor Cash Flow or zero Cash Flow to bring the companies assets forward.