Explained today on #peston what to think about when interpreting Friday’s results-and trying to map them towards gen election. One is the comparison point. Labour tanked in 2019 general election but vote share in 2018 (comparison for most seats up) was neck and neck w Tories 1/
Which is why so many psephologists stress that in some places Labour standing would still be progress. I ran through some councils that will help us draw conclusions. Eg Bury council- if Labour retains its majority on council that would indicate 2 MP seats could be won by them 2/
Christian Wakeford has since crossed floor, but Tories won both Bury seats in 2019. Labour has to win back to have any chance. As @itvnews election analyst Colin Rallings said-Bury is the foothills in electoral mountain Starmer needs to overcome to have any chance of being pm 3/
On flipside if Tories shift dial in these red wall seats that will be sign they are digging in - or could make red wall gains. Eg Sunderland council. Labour has held MP seats there but could it’s council majority be reduced? (Losing control would be v bad sign for Lab) 4/
One q no party knows answer to is how many Tories could stay at home tomorrow, or how much people local over national. These things make national predictions hard. We will also want to look at blue wall 5/
For eg- we’ve seen big change in Worthing council - from no Labour councillors pre 2018 to neck and neck now. There is demographic change here that favours Labour. So if it’s making progress - really you’d expect Labour to take council 6/
And even if there is a win- next q is how many areas are changing like Worthing and where are they? There will be lots of interesting dynamics in Lib Dem v Tory areas. And London will be interesting too. In Scotland vote share key. In NI assembly could be a significant shift 7/
Here is the clip from Peston. And we will be back with analysis after polls close and through Friday.
A THREAD on what I’ve learned about the asylum policy unveiled today by govt to tackle small boat crossings. Firstly there was “despair” among some home office officials. Told the mood was terrible this morning, with fears of resignations 1/
There are the worries you might expect (will it work? Impact assessment wasn’t convincing on others measures; is it safe to send folk to detention in Rwanda; is it fair) but a big one is the cost-and fears it cd balloon to billions with not just hundreds but thousands of staff 2/
In fact - there is talk (Home Office won’t confirm or deny) of what is known as “ministerial directions” which is where the permanent secretary basically objects to a policy on a value for money basis so has to ask SOS to directly order it to go ahead 3/
The plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is obvs all about trying to look tough when it comes to the small boats crossing from Calais. A lot of Tory MPs- including many in “red wall” seats tell me it’s no 1 issue for constituents. But will it actually work to deter people? 1/
The other part of this policy is in the Borders bill that puts in place legislation that criminalises people arriving in Britain via small boats. Some Tory MPs actually threatened to pull support for the bill cos they think with human rights act in place it’s not tough enough 2/
But interesting to look at government’s own equality impact assessment of the legislation. Ministers say aim is to persuade asylum seekers to claim in the first safe country they arrive in, but the doc says “evidence supporting the effectiveness of this approach is limited”. 3/
Here’s my take on today. Tory WhatsApp groups very quiet today. Those who helps shore up Boris Johnson support 3 months ago say it would be full panic if this happened then, but very different mood now 1/
This is partly timing - it’s recess and MPs aren’t together discussing all of this… but also for some time they’ve wanted to move away from this as focus shifted to Ukraine and to cost of living. 2/
That doesn’t mean they aren’t shocked / angry- but quite a lot less angry than 3 months ago. Lots have been really impressed by his response on Ukraine, but others who had been plotting wanted out of that earlier and the war means they have a reason now 3/
It’s very clear that the invasion of Ukraine has dramatically shifted the mood within the Conservative party. Sir Roger Gale-who was an early critic of the PM- says domestic issues will have to wait because anything that destabilises this govt would be positive for Putin 1/
Another Mp messaged: “For me personally the situation in Ukraine has changed a lot for me. Both because that’s where I think all the focus should be and secondly the PM in my view has handled it very well. I also think the number 10 team is much stronger.” 2/
They added: “Clearly people are right to be angry about it. I am. However I don’t think plunging into a leadership election bearing in mind current environment would be the responsible thing to do.” 3/
NEW: In order to massively expand booster scheme NHS has published letter that says GPs will be able to delay some routine health checks for patients up to March 2022. 1/
The letter says that hospitals must expand capacity for delivering boosters within their hubs - that the military will come in to help with logistics, and that student medics will also help the effort when not training 2/
QOFs - which are paid to GPs for the services they deliver are going to be tweaked - they will continue for vaccination, cervical screening & other urgent services, but in other areas income will be protected, even if the same level of service is not delivered 3/
EXCLUSIVE: government is planning to amend policing bill today to explicitly list “domestic abuse” and “sexual violence” in a new duty for police & councils to tackle violent crime. Big victory for @BertinGabby & @CommissionerDA 👇 itv.com/news
Campaigners warned that too often these crimes are simply not being treated as violent crime- only 8/18 violence reduction units in England include domestic abuse in their strategies and it’s not even named in the 2018 Serious Violence Strategy
Very few crimes are explicitly listed under the violent crime duty because govt says local areas need to decide what’s right where they are.
But campaigners say all evidence shows domestic abuse is ubiquitous and yet not treated seriously enough in a no of areas