Let's get real Anatoly #Antonov@RusEmbUSA It is @KremlinRussia_E who has issued threats of nuclear weapons use and started a war that raises the risk of nuclear annihilation. Russia cannot have it both ways and claim to be a "responsible" nuclear actor when it is clearly not. 1/
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia_E It is #Putin who has issued nuclear threats to shield Russia's aggression against a nonnuclear, democratic, independent state, raised the alert levels of Russian forces, overseen an ICBM flight tests, and authorized Russian state TV to air simulations of attacks on Europe. 2/
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia_E Fortunately, and so far, Biden and NATO have not matched Russia's nuclear taunts and have taken the threats seriously and have made it clear they do not want U.S. and NATO forces involved in the conflict in Ukraine, but will act to help Ukraine defend its people and territory. 3/
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia_E Nevertheless, as result of Putin's premeditated attack on Ukraine. the world faces a heightened risk of nuclear war. If Russian and NATO/U.S. start fighting in Europe, the risk of nuclear escalation is real and would start w/the use of short-range, tactical nuclear weapons. 4/
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia_E Once and if nuclear weapons are used in a conflict between nuclear-armed adversaries, the level of destruction would not only become massive, but there is no guarantee the nuclear war could be "limited." The fog of war is thick; the fog of nuclear war would be thicker.
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia_E This "PLAN A" simulation depicts what might happen if Russia or US used nukes in a war in Europe. An initial volley of “tactical” detonations, could escalate and lead to a massive exchange of long-range n-weapons. > 91m would likely die within hours:
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia_E In the current, heightened state of nuclear danger, it is even more important that Russian, NATO, and U.S. leaders take steps to avoid nuclear escalation. A cease fire, a Russian withdrawal from Ukraine, and an end the war would be ideal. Until then other steps are critical. 7/
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia_E So Amb. Antonov, it is not enough for the leaders of nuclear-armed states to declare that “a nuclear war cannot be won and must not be fought.” Much more is necessary to prevent nuclear catastrophe and eliminate the threats posed by nuclear weapons and nuclear war. 8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Russia accuses US of nuclear testing site activity, says it won't test unless US does" @mfa_russia claims of U.S. prep for n-testing are not supported by evidence; may be an attempt to justify RF moves to actually do so. If this is a real concern ... 1/reuters.com/world/russia-w…
@mfa_russia Russia (and China) should take up the U.S. offer to "work with others to develop a regime that would allow reciprocal observation with radiation detection equipment at each other’s
subcritical experiments to allow confirmation that the experiment was consistent with the
CTBT." 2/
@mfa_russia The U.S., China, and RF, all #CTBT signatories, continue to engage in weapons-related activities at their former n-testing sites. Voluntary confidence-building measures designed to detect and deter possible low-level, clandestine n-testing can allay concerns prior to CTBT EIF. 3/
The @JoeBiden admin is still discussing a deal w/#KSA and Israel to normalize their relations that might involve U.S./intl cooperation for dual-use nuclear tech transfers to the Saudis, who have nuclear energy AND nuclear weapons ambitions. Some reminders and a warning. #NPT 1/
@JoeBiden As @nytimes reported in April (nytimes.com/2023/04/01/us/… ) Biden admin “is committed to supporting Saudi Arabia’s ... efforts to develop a peaceful nuclear energy program” which requires “highest intl standards on safety, nonproliferation, export controls and physical security.” 2/
@JoeBiden@nytimes Those intl. nonpro. standards are set by the Nuclear Suppliers Group and terms of U.S. nuclear cooperation is set by Sec. 123 of the Atomic Energy Act. In 2011, in the aftermath of the U.S.-led exemption for India, the NSG tightened its guidelines. See armscontrol.org/pressroom/2011… 3/
Talk abt deployment of Russian strategic nuclear weapons in Belarus is absurd and editors at @CNN need to get their facts straight abt nuclear weapons: "Lukashenko says Putin could deploy more powerful Russian nuclear weapons in Belarus" cnn.com/2023/03/31/eur… Some thoughts 1/
@CNN "Strategic" nuclear weapons are long-range weapons, designed to hit targets across the globe. Deploying Russian strategic nuclear delivery systems in Belarus would provide no value to Russia and would not "protect" Belarus, only make it a target in a way it currently is not. 2/
@CNN .@CNN incorrectly says "tactical warheads are designed for use in a limited battlefield, for example to destroy a command post or a column of tanks, strategic n-warheads are designed to destroy entire cities." TNWs are for short-range delivery; they can destroy cities too. 3/
Appalling, arrogant, irresponsible behavior by major nuclear-armed states (U.S., Britain, Russia, India, and China) who are questioning Pacific island nations' call for nuclear legacy help at UN Human Rights Council. See: reuters.com/world/major-un… cc @USUN@UnderSecT#nuclearban 1/
@USUN@UnderSecT From 1946 to 1958, the United States government tested 67 high-yield nuclear weapons in the atmosphere and under water in the Marshall Islands. This reckless and dangerous series of nuclear detonations caused incalculable harm to the land and people of the Marshall Islands. 2/
@USUN@UnderSecT As the 2012 report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the impact of the U.S. nuclear testing program on human rights in the Republic of the Marshall Island concluded: “The nuclear testing resulted in both immediate and continuing effects on the human rights of the Marshallese..." 3/
Surprise! Misinfo from @SenTedCruz on benefits of restoring 2015 #IranDeal Yes, the admin. has an assessment, which finds there ARE significant benefits, namely increasing time it would take Iran to produce an SQ of fissile material from 2 wks today to approx. 9 mnths. 1/
@SenTedCruz In addition, restoring compliance with JCPOA would ensure enhanced IAEA inspections, which are essential to provide early warning in the event Iran tries to evade the JCPOA restrictions or violate its safeguards obligations. 2/
@SenTedCruz Trump's decision to exit JCPOA in 2018 not only failed to produce the promised results; it opened the way for Iran to take steps breach the JCPOA’s nuclear limits and accelerate its capacity to produce bomb-grade nuclear material. Pursuing the same failed strategy is lunacy. 3/
Nuclear arms control is a serious business that requires serious ideas and serious diplomacy. Unfortunately @USArmsControl continues to demonstrate that @realDonaldTrump is unserious and lacks a real arms control strategy. Some comments 1/
@USArmsControl@realDonaldTrump First, it should be noted that China’s position has not changed even if Team Trump wants to say it is shifting regarding talks on things nuclear. What @FuCong17 said on July 7
@USArmsControl@realDonaldTrump@FuCong17 Unfortunately, U.S. officials and Chinese officials are talking past one another. Rather than use existing P5 format for engage in necessary discussions on strategic stability and nuclear arms control, U.S. officials continue to insist on separate trilateral talks w/Russia. 3/