This story, via @washingtonpost, about far-right GOP donor Steven Hotze being prosecuted for a scheme in which he allegedly dispatched a former cop to surveil an HVAC contractor, claiming he was delivering fraudulent ballots in the 2020 election, is something else. Thread: 1/x
I've written about Hotze, and his lawyer, Jared Woodfill before. Read the story. I have a few thoughts. 2/x
There are a lot of twists and turns here, but the gist is that Hotze, who has been criminally charged, allegedly bankrolled the ex-cop, through his nonprofit Liberty Center for God and Country, to find "voter fraud," and he settled on some random HVAC repairman. 3/x
The ex-cop allegedly rammed this poor guy's van and tried to make a "citizens' arrest." The DA in Harris County says of Hotze and the ex-cop: 4/x
Read the whole thing for all the twists, conspiracies, mishaps, and denials, including that there is a taped telephone conversation between Hotze and Ryan Patrick, a federal prosecutor in Texas under Trump, and the son of Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (Hotze's friend). 5/x
Basically it looks like Hotze was trying to urge the younger Patrick to bring a federal case. 6/x
(The HVAC repairman is suing Hotze, et. al.) 7/x
Hotze is being represented by his friend, the lawyer and activist Jared Woodfill, whose campaign against trans people in Texas I wrote about in 2018. 8/x
Hotze and Woodfill have been highly active around Texas GOP politics, always aiming to push the state party further and further to the right, attacking other Republicans as insufficiently conservative. 12/x
Woodfill told me in 2017 that they go to the same church as their friend Dan Patrick, whose son Hotze allegedly tried to convince to prosecute imagined voter fraud. 13/x
Starting in 2014, Woodfill and Hotze spearheaded a campaign that became the germ of today's anti-trans assaults in red states across the country. 14/x typeinvestigations.org/investigation/…
Woodfill told me in 2017 his ultimate goal is overturning Obergefell, and that he saw Trump, with his judicial nominations, as the path to doing that. Read the whole piece via @typeinvestigations or @RollingStone rollingstone.com/politics/polit… 15/x
So basically in this really convoluted story about Hotze's "voter fraud" scheme, you see this progression: Christian nationalist activist believes Christians must take over government. Works tirelessly for decades to achieve result, precinct by precinct, law by law. 16/x
Public opinion seems to be turning the wrong way. Obergefell and LGBTQ rights, especially, even as they think they can ultimately reverse Roe. So the task becomes more urgent, in their minds. 17/x
So they support Trump. They get the judicial nominees they want. But once they've had that power they don't want to let it go, by any means necessary. 18/x
I think a lot of people don't really appreciate the extent to which the aims of (and disappointments of) the religious right are tied up in Trump's stolen election lie, and the quest to hold onto power because their ideology and political position is unpopular. 19/x
When you have people, like Hotze, who think they are carrying out a divine mission to take over government from secularists, "communists," or "sodomites," things get dangerous very fast, as evidenced in this alleged plot, for which hopefully there will be accountability. 23/23
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I can think of a side that's pretty happy about it.
(via NYT)
The actual article is tragicomically terrible. Reporters went out an interviewed random people, both pro-Roe and anti-Roe, and concluded that all of them, regardless of their views of the outcome of Dobbs, are upset the court is too politicized.
Reading the leaked draft Alito opinion now. First section deeply wedded to not finding "history and tradition" of allowing abortion in American-Anglo legal tradition. Alito going down a highly selective historical rabbit hole. 1/x
To wit: 2/x
(Side note: I Google Henry de Bracton, whose legal treatise Alito cites. He was a jurist and cleric during the reign of King John, who was a really bad king. As if we should be looking to 13th c. British law anyway. But I digress). 3/x
The Christian right has been clear and unabashed about its goal for decades: overturning Roe. That's why they created law schools to train lawyers, law firms to litigate it, and organizations to create solidarity between conservative lawyers and Republican politicians. 1/x
That's why they recruited and trained candidates to run for office, organized pastors to engage more with politics. 2/x
That's why they harassed women outside abortion clinics. 3/x
Majority of White evangelicals think US not doing enough to help Ukraine, should do more.
But back in 2019/20, when Trump was being impeached over *withholding military aid to Ukraine to boost his own political fortunes,* majority opposed impeachment.
Almost as if they didn't know what the impeachment proceedings were actually about.
Trump was literally depriving Ukraine of the ability to defend itself against Russian aggression. Yet for evangelicals the impeachment was part of the "Russia hoax" and Dems' "Trump derangement syndrome."
This entire exercise raises Qs: 1) whether it's newsworthy that people who participated in a focus group are confused/misguided/believe things that aren't real (maybe) and 2) whether it's ok to report those things without context or probing how they arrived at these beliefs (no).
In the example I highlighted above, the participant believes that Trump signed executive orders "for so many different cultures and people" (what?) but that people who just want to believe "sound bites" are "irrational" and for that he blames the media.
One of Trump's closest evangelical allies, Robert Jeffress, today in his newsletter describes Russia's invasion of Ukraine as "lawless" and "an awful display of needless aggression by a glory-hungry dictator" (but does not mention Trump).
(He also adds that "these events probably do not herald the end of the world" but rather the "birth pangs" prophesied in the Bible.)
Note that in the past Jeffress has disagreed with Trump without confronting him with it, such as when he accepted the results of the election but that Trump "has a right to believe" it was stolen. revealnews.org/article/how-th…