#wewereliedtoabout911#911Justice#911Truth#OmarAlBayoumi#PrinceBandar Philip Zelikow is the "smoking gun" of 9/11 as far as showing that we never had and desperately need a real investigation into 9/11. Outside the reach of those with a vested interest in suppressing the truth
(1) All of this was posted on 2/7/2015 concerning the 28 (29) Redacted Pages. Philip Zelikow to the rescue...
______________________________________
“The questions raised by the twenty-eight pages were an important part of the commission’s agenda; indeed, its director...
(2) ...Philip Zelikow, hired staffers who had worked for the Joint Inquiry on that very section to follow up on the material. According to Zelikow, what they found does not substantiate the arguments made by the Joint Inquiry and by the 9/11 families in the lawsuit...
(3) ...against the Saudis. He characterized the twenty-eight pages as “an agglomeration of preliminary, unvetted reports” concerning Saudi involvement. “They were wild accusations that needed to be checked out,” he said.
Zelikow and his staff were ultimately unable...
(4) ...to prove any official Saudi complicity in the attacks. A former staff member of the 9/11 Commission who is intimately familiar with the material in the twenty-eight pages recommends against their declassification, warning that the release of inflammatory and speculative...
(5) ...information could “ramp up passions” and damage U.S.-Saudi relations.” - [New Yorker, 9/9/2014]
“Some like Philip Zelikow, former executive director of the 9/11 commission, who reviewed the report, believe it should remain secret.” - [CBSNews, 1/8/2015]
(6) “Others familiar with that section of the report say that while it might implicate Saudi Arabia, the suspicions, investigatory leads and other findings it contains did not withstand deeper scrutiny. Philip D. Zelikow, the executive director of the national commission that...
(7) ...investigated the Sept. 11 attacks after the congressional panels, said the commission followed up on the allegations, using some of the same personnel who wrote them initially, but reached a different conclusion.
“Saudi Arabia has long been considered the primary source..
(8) ...of Al Qaeda funding, but we have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization,” the commission said in its July 2004 report. It did note, however, the “likelihood that charities with...
(9) ...significant Saudi government sponsorship diverted funds to Al Qaeda.”
Mr. Zelikow pointed to the more thorough investigation undertaken by the commission.
“Those involved in the preparation of the famous 28 pages joined the staff of the 9/11 Commission...
(10) ...and participated in the follow-up investigation of all the leads that had been developed earlier,” he said Wednesday. “In doing so, they were aided by a larger team with more members, more powers and for the first time actually conducted interviews of relevant...
(11) ...people both in this country and in Saudi Arabia.”
“And what we found is reflected in the commission report,” he said.” - [NYTimes, 2/5/2015]
“Philip Zelikow, former executive director of the 9/11 Commission, a separate U.S. government inquiry into the attacks, said...
(12) ...it was appropriate that the material was classified and there may still be reason to withhold it.” - [Reuters, 2/5/2015]
“Other officials, including the executive director of the Sept. 11 commission, have said the classified documents do not prove that the Saudi...
(13) ...government knew about or financed the 2001 terrorist attacks, and that making the material public would serve no purpose.” - [AP, 2/7/2015]
(14) From 7/14/2016...
"Philip Zelikow, the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, blocked half of the interview requests for Saudi investigators. He made it difficult for investigators to gain access to the 28 redacted pages, and fired Dana Lesemann who gained access to...
(15) ...the pages through a back channel to try and do her job. He and Dieter Snell took part in a late night editing session to remove Saudi support for the hijackers from the final 9/11 Report, and moved the information into footnotes in the back of the book. Against the...
(16) ...wishes of Mike Jacboson and Raj De, two staffers who investigated the issue."
@caitoz (1) 9/11 was the "greatest scandal in American political history." By far. How many millions did we kill, displace, torture or wound in the name of 9/11? How many infrastructures of countries have we destroyed in the name of 9/11? How many civil liberties did we lose...
@caitoz (2) ...in the name of 9/11? How many police have become militarized in the name of 9/11? What is going on in the Ukraine RIGHT NOW is a DIRECT RESULT of our actions after 9/11. Completely destabilizing the Middle East in Putin's backyard in the name of 9/11. Putting military...
@caitoz (3) ...bases along Russia's border in the name of 9/11. The Russia/Georgia War which Cheney had something to do with. Taking out Russia's allies like Syria and Iran in the name of 9/11. Constantly "poking" Putin, installing a puppet Government in the Ukraine in 2014...
"In Fact #14, I mention that “the co-chair of the Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11, Bob Graham, wrote an article that said, “…the (Saudi) agent secured and paid for an apartment. He arranged flight lessons.
(2) He introduced them to a tight circle of Muslims, primarily Saudis, who offered additional support.” […] “The (Saudi) agent then tapped another source of funds: a welfare account maintained for the benefit of Saudis in need by the wife of the kingdom’s ambassador to the...
For some reason, the pinned tweet I had of my second book has disappeared. Can someone help me find that tweet please? It's the one that says it's a gift for everyone, etc... Thanks.
(2) How many of you openly admit that at one time, you listened to Paul Joseph Watson? I never did. I barely listened to Alex Jones. There is no shame in once listening to him. Everyone makes mistakes. As I wrote in my first book...
(3) "As for the well-intentioned, misinformed people who peddle nonsense, I have more sympathy for them. Very early on, I promoted a lot of information from different authors and independent journalists that I shouldn't have. Much of that information was discrediting...
(2) I've been covering it for years. As I said yesterday "I'm guessing their conscience got to them after realizing they killed, wounded and displaced people so rich people could become more rich. Or, they lost friends, etc... something like that. It's horrible."