David Barr QC is explaining what to expect over from the #SpycopsInquiry over the next few weeks. We are due to hear oral evidence from 7 former #spycops managers and 2 "civilian witnesses".
The @ucpinquiry will also publish written evidence on their website - including witness statements and a new time-line relating to the early years (1968-82) of the 'Special Demonstration Squad'
@ucpinquiry The two civilian witnesses are @LindseyAGerman (of the Socialist Workers Party) and Elizabeth Leicester (who was a member of the Workers Revolutionary Party)
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman 'Madeleine' has supplied more evidence for the Inquiry - including a postcard sent to her by 'Vince Miller', who deceived her into a relationship.
Vince Harvey went on to become a Detective Chief Inspector and then worked at the National Criminal Intelligence Service. #SpyCops
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman This tactic (of sending postcards and letters to women activists who they'd deceived) was copied by #spycops over the next 4 decades
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman The #SpycopsInquiry plans to publish more evidence online today - this will include witness statements from former managers and other documents which mention them; *extracts* from Special Branch Annual Reports & other internal SB/ Security Services/ Home Office documents #SpyCops
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman Counsel to the Inquiry David Barr is using this morning's session to describe the "open source documents" that are being uploaded to the #SpycopsInquiry website - follow @tombfowler for more detail of these.
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman@tombfowler ( #spycopsinquiry Chair) Mitting himself has finally popped up on screen to welcome the public to this 'Public Inquiry' - he claims technical problems this morning prevented him from doing so earlier. #SpyCops
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman@tombfowler Also being published today: transcripts (redacted in places) from the secret, 'closed', hearings which the @ucpinquiry have held since last year. These include more details of #spycops abusing their power and deceiving women into sex/ relationships - shocking yet not surprising.
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman@tombfowler The #SpycopsInquiry is now going to change the way they organise their work, revisit the Restriction Orders which gave anonymity to former officers HN80 'Colin Clark' and HN106 'Barry Tompkins', and possibly produce an "Interim Report" at the end of this "Tranche". #SpyCops
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman@tombfowler@metpoliceuk@bristolnoborder@MetPolice Mitting has come back on screen and refuted several of Skelton's suggestions!
He thinks he knows enough about modern history to understand what was going on in the 70s, is unwilling to catalogue his extensive "home library" or publish a list of all the books he's ever read.
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman@tombfowler@metpoliceuk@bristolnoborder@MetPolice Not the obvious problematic behaviour (deceiving women into sex and using the identities of dead children) but some of their other activities - eg fraudulently gaining entry to people's homes by pretending to be someone else - regarded as trespass & 'breaking' in the Larceny Act
@ucpinquiry@LindseyAGerman@tombfowler@metpoliceuk@bristolnoborder@MetPolice ..and distributing confidential info (eg banking details) would also be considered a breach of civil LAW. In Mitting's view, the British police try to avoid breaching civil laws, which is why they usually have to get warrants to do certain things.
Mitting is responding to some of the points made - says it would be 'gargantuan' and a waste of public money (?!) to find all of the relevant 'Registry Files' and other documents held by the State.
Kilroy repeats that the #spycops operations were obviously unlawful - Mitting says her submissions are "forceful and well-founded" but he's unwilling to respond immediately on the question of lawfulness...
Another break, before the #SpyCopsInquiry returns, to hear from Owen Greenhall, representing Lord Peter Hain, Professor Jonathan Rosenhead and Ernest Rodker.
One of these #spycops was HN348, known as 'Sandra Davies', who spied on Diane and her family for two years. The Women's Liberation Front (WLF) held many meetings in private homes and Sandra went along to them.
Sandra said herself that she never witnessed any criminal, subversive, disruptive or violent activity on the part of WLF members. The group was engaged in leafleting, holding meetings and attending demonstrations.
Another officer who reported on Diane was HN45, tasked with infiltrating Maoist groups - he also doesn't remember witnessing public disorder on their or Diane's part.
The #SpyCopsInquiry is due to start again after lunch - you can watch the 'action' on youtube - at
Charlotte Kilroy QC is due to return, this time representing two individual core participants, 'Madeleine' and Diane Langford. Watch live at
follow us or @tombfowler
@tombfowler Diane makes it clear in her statement that she has never taken part in or been arrested for criminal activity. She has been politically active for many years.
The #spycopsinquiry is due to start again at 10am.
Today we'll hear Opening Statements from the Home Office, but also from many of the 'Non State Core Participants' (i.e. people who were targeted by the Special Demonstration Squad and other #spycops ).
You can watch online...
First up today, we've had Catherine Brown on screen, making an extremely statement on behalf of the Home Secretary. And now a ten minute break before we start hearing from the Core Participants...
Why did HN96 believe that the SWP were 'the most disruptive, from a public order perspective, that were currently active'?
(as he says in his witness statement)
(2)
Was this borne out by his experience of them at demos?
His statement only refers to a few “scuffles” with the police and violent exchanges with the far-right.
(3)
Next up today at the #spycopsinquiry – and again you can see the moving transcript for yourself at – is 'HN96' – who used the cover name 'Michael James'
(1)
He infiltrated the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) and Troops Out Movement (TOM).
His real name is restricted.
He will be giving oral evidence for most of today.
(2)
You can read more about Michael James (HN96) on pages 256 – 268
of the CTI opening statement: ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
(3)