Five years ago today, I was working in Labour HQ on the #GE2017 campaign
In two days’ time the manifesto was going before the Clause V meeting of 80 delegates for sign-off, before its launch the following week
Just after 9pm, an ashen-looking @schneiderhome approached me… 🧵
He told me that the Daily Mirror and Daily Telegraph had the manifesto, and were going to publish it
I had been working over 100 hours a week, non-stop writing, editing and negotiating - alongside a brilliant team doing similarly
I was gutted and angry, wondering “HOW?”
Most other senior staff & politicians were in another meeting, which I'd missed to focus on final edits before Clause V
A febrile inquiry and crisis management plan kicked into gear immediately. This had never happened before in British electoral history
Let’s start with how…
The day before, following weeks of prior negotiations, a reps from each of Labour’s affiliated unions were invited into a room, their phones confiscated, and numbered, paper copies given out
They were supervised and all copies were collected back at the end. It wasn’t them …
Earlier that day, at their request, I'd sent the current version of the manifesto to Jeremy Corbyn and to Deputy Leader Tom Watson
Suspicion fell on the far from loyal deputy
Soon after 10pm the leaked manifesto was published. It wasn’t the updated version. So they were clear…
Who did that leave? The only other recipients were to Scottish and Welsh Labour.
The UK manifesto does not wholly apply in Scotland and Wales, as they have devolved powers over several areas of policy.
They get an early draft so that they can start adapting their sections…
We wouldn't find out for weeks, but I was later told by the senior Labour staffer who investigated that the leak had come from the Scottish Labour office.
The leak was an attempt to sabotage the party, and the headlines the next morning reflected that ...
As acts of sabotage go, it probably backfired more than any other in political history
It generated massive coverage and discussion of radical and interesting policy.
@bbclaurak said "This will be an election where voters will not be able to say 'they're all the same'"
But in the short term it caused problems. The day after those headlines, Clause V delegates (many not on the left of the party) would meet to agree the manifesto. What if they wanted substantial changes?
And that morning Jeremy was due to launch a poster attacking the Tories…
That was pulled, and an heroic @GwynneMP did a full media round to walk the line of syaing these are our ideas, but not yet our manifesto, while not distancing himself from any of them
Andrew was up half the night with me and others being briefed on policy and media lines 🦸♂️
The next day, the manifesto was agreed with only a few minor tweaks and was now ready for its official launch at Bradford University on 16 May 2017.
But the Clause V meeting wasn't entirely smooth. On the way in Jeremy's driver ran over a photographer's foot and on the way out…
The official manifesto launch 'For The Many, Not the Few' was a massive success, with the brilliant design unveiled.
At the start of the campaign, Labour had been 25 points behind the Conservatives in the polls. We closed the gap to just 2.4% and took away the Tories' majority…
In 2017, Labour gained seats in a general election for the first time since 1997. Labour added 30 MPs and 3.5 million votes from just two years earlier.
Labour's share of the vote had increased by more than at any time since 1945.
And why ..?
Manifestos are very much a collective effort. I had an amazing policy team (especially Mary, Jennifer, Lachlan & Mark); great input and advice from trade unions, politicians & others
The design team in HQ made that iconic cover, and the events team made the launch spectacular…
I suppose I should thank whoever leaked it too (despite nearly giving me a coronary 5 years ago today)
If you want to read more about the campaign I suggest Kavanagh & Cowley's tome or @alexnunns' updated Candidate
I’ve just seen these posts from Tom. And so I just want to go through his thread, for the record
When I phoned Jeremy (who had the manifesto the same day as Tom) I asked him whether he'd he sent it on to anyone? When I phoned Tom I asked him the same …🧵
This is true (I'd forgotten at that stage about Welsh & Scottish Labour) but as I said above, I asked both Jeremy & Tom if they'd shared it, who might have had access to their email, and if they’d printed it, left it anywhere, etc
This seems a blatant lie. Or more generously, perhaps Tom has forgotten that we went through the versions on the night of the leak and I agreed with him that it wasn’t the same version I had sent him.
After that shocking Lib Dem attack ad from Labour in #LocalElections2022 it appears there's an even worse one attacking the Greens, which was apparently doing the rounds in the West Midlands:
This is going to take a 🧵to unpick ...
Firstly we see the familiar attack from the Lib Dem one - that the Greens are soft on crime and on drugs.
It implies Labour doesn't want to reduce the prison population (the highest in Europe) or make any liberalisation of the UK's ineffective drugs laws - which is dumb.
Secondly, in attacking the Greens, it attacks two which are Labour policies as well 🤦
It is Labour policy to abolish right to buy. @WelshLabour has abolished right to buy.
Raising corporation tax to 24%. In 2019 Labour pledged to raise to 26%. Last year Sunak raised it to 25%
On this day 45 years ago, the Labour Cabinet of Jim Callaghan accepted an IMF loan, paving the way for Thatcherism
Denis Healey, speaking at Cabinet on 02/12/76, advocated a path based on cuts, privatisation and rising unemployment, “Anything less will not restore confidence”🧵
Michael Foot, with foresight of the situation he'd face as Leader, argued it might be better for the Govt to fall than to accept the IMF terms:
“We want to sustain the Government; or if forced into opposition, sustain ourselves in unity rather than be split into snarling groups”
Tony Benn pushed the Alternative Economic Strategy at Cabinet, and argued:
“This plan is based on two things: on Treasury forecasts that have been systematically wrong and on a monetarist theory that we don’t, for one moment, accept ourselves … there is a parallel with 1931”
On Tory Govt
“We’re calling them honourable; these people aren't honourable. They’re not honourable at all. They are completely self-interested. And dodgy, I think, is the mildest term that I could have used” labourlist.org/2021/11/zarah-…
This is 🤯 re: Batley & Spen by-election:
"I reached out to the party, saying, ‘hey, if there’s anything that I can do with young members, or the Muslim community, please let me know because I’m really keen to help out’, given what was happening... That offer wasn’t taken up."
As a young Muslim woman, she says she's been treated differently:
"Sultana points out that her maiden speech referring to “40 years of Thatcherism” caused uproar, yet nobody blinked an eye when Lisa Nandy talked about “40 years of economic decline”"
On this day 40 years ago (7 Nov 1981), Bermondsey Labour Party 🌹 selected Peter Tatchell, as its prospective Parliamentary candidate, in place of sitting MP Bob Mellish.
In December, the Organisational Sub-committee of the NEC rejected Peter Tatchell as a Labour candidate ...🧵
Bob Mellish resigned from the Labour Party in August 1982 and from his seat in November, causing a by-election.
Tatchell was selected again by the local party, and this time not blocked by the NEC. The by-election was set for Feb 1983 ...
In the run up to the by-election, virulent homophobia was unleashed
The Labour leader of Southwark Council stood as ‘Real Bermondsey Labour’. He was filmed touring the seat on the back of a horse and cart, singing a song referring to Tatchell "wearing his trousers back to front"