"HM's government will play a leading role in defending democracy and freedom across the world".
HM's government will repeal the Human Rights Act. #Queenspeech#HumanRights#HumanRightsAct
video via sky news
The Govt have gone to the @coe and rightly pleaded with them to expel Russia, for gross human rights violations in Ukraine.
Yet the Govt has now also formally announced its plans to substitute the HRA with a UK Bill of Rights (and undermine the operation of the ECHR in the UK).
@coe 3. Contradictions and sheer hypocrisy from the Govt, Baroness @SarahLudford: "HMG will ensure the Constitution is defended". Defended against whom? The Judiciary, deploying human rights, to protect it?
4. Defended by whom? Those who continuously sought to bypass it (in Miller 1 and Miller 2 e.g.), and who now attack its human rights foundations?
5. "HM's Ministers will restore the balance of power between the legislature and the courts by introducing a Bill of Rights".
Which assumes an imbalance in favour of the judiciary that exists only in the imagination of far right ideologues in the Conservative party.
6. In view of overwhelming evidence that it has received, in favour of protecting the Human Rights Act, the Independent Human Rights Act Review made modest suggestions for reform, but their report fell on deaf ears and the Govt is pushing through for mere political expediency.
7. The Govt should be listening to what the former President of the @UKSupremeCourt said here:
10. Important to note a symbolic contradiction too, @SarahLudford. Justice Secretary @DominicRaab delivering a Queen's Speech (to Prince Charles) engineered to undermine fundamental human rights, judicial independence and, ultimately, the rule of law.
11. Interesting emphasis here too, on "HM's Ministers" (leading on the attack on the Human Rights Act).
A damning critique by Lord Neuberger, of the state of the rule of law in the UK (which was reminiscent of Lord Bingham’s work in the area) — it was the concluding presentation at this excellent workshop on 'democratic backsliding' in the UK organised by @ExeterLawSchool.
THREAD
2. Lord Neuberger pointed out that we need (and indeed have) a judiciary that is independent, respected and effective.
He then went on to describe three attacks by the executive on judicial independence, some direct and visible to all, some more pernicious that need spelling out
3. He identified Judicial Review as the first area under attack, pointing to ouster clauses, giving ministers Henry VIII powers to change statutes and attempting to reverse Miller 2
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @DimitriosGian view original on Twitter
2. ECtHR has found that where uncertainty & precariousness of individual’s situation affects network of his or her personal, social & economic relations, there can be an infringement of Art 8. A situation of insecurity should in any case be short-lived. @BRinEUROPE@NewEuropeans
3. I now want to take this a bit further & suggest that continued precariousness sh perhaps be examined in context of 'hostile environment' vis-a-vis immigrants, e.g. re immigration exception in Data Proetction, bank accounts checks, surprise raids etc @NewEuropeans@libertyhq