LawBeat Profile picture
May 11 5 tweets 3 min read
BREAKING: Jagadguru Paramhans Acharya moves Allahabad High Court after denial of entry to #Tajmahal.
The Acharya and his pupil were denied entry to the monument twice owing to their Dharmdand and Bhagwa Vastra.
The Jagadguru has argued that in the Hindu religion Jagatguru has the authority to take Dharmdand and wear Bhagwa Vastra and they are allowed 'to go anywhere in India' without any permission and they also can travel by any mode of transport.
His petition states, "Now petitioners have doubt that there is some mystery in the #Tajmahal and they have suspicion that there were some ancient Hindu temples (there)...Therefore, the matter needs proper investigation."
The Jagadguru has sought ad-interim mandamus commanding and directing the administration and security officer of #Tajmahal to allow him and his pupil to enter the Tajmahal with their Dharmdand and Bhagwa Vastra without any restrictions.
#TajMahalControversy
The plea states that the prohibition of the entry of the Jagadguru and his pupil into the Tajmahal is against the provision of natural justice and a violation of their fundamental rights provided by the Constitution. @ISalilTiwari reports
lawbeat.in/top-stories/ja…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

May 11
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by @samajwadiparty leader Azam Khan.
On the last date of hearing, #SupremeCourt expressed displeasure over the Allahabad High Court not passing orders in Khan’s bail plea.

lawbeat.in/top-stories/su…
ASG Raju: He wanted bail in one matter, he has been granted milords.

Justice Rao: One or two cases is fine, why 89 matters? He has been in jail for two years?

Justice Gavai: Why is this pattern continuing? As soon as he is granted bail in one matter , he is jailed.
Read 4 tweets
May 11
#SupremeCourt to hear pleas by foreign nationals challenging their blacklisting by Ministry of Home Affairs for participating in Tablighi Jamaat.
CU Singh, Salman Khurshid and Menaka Guruswamy Sr. Advs appear for the petitioner.

Singh reads the press release on blacklisting the foreigner.

Bench: This is a press release, the order will have to be quashed. Not the press release.

Singh: Its in the Union’s counter milord
Singh: There is no letter from Bureau of Immigration saying we have violated visa conditions. There is no such letter, there is just a list of people.

Bench: Show us the names of the petitioners from the list.
Read 45 tweets
May 11
#SupremeCourt to hear batch of petitions challenging constitutional validity of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code i.e. #SeditionLaw.
Yesterday, the Court had asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to take instructions as to what will be status of pending and future sedition cases during the time Centre re-examines the validity of Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code i.e. sedition law.

lawbeat.in/top-stories/se…
SG submitted that I have proposed a direction for the Central Government, we cannot prevent reporting of a cognizable offence.
Read 18 tweets
May 11
🚨Gulfisha Fatima approaches Delhi High Court against order rejecting bail which found that as per witnesses, she “started blockade, prompted attack on police personnel & others with weapons like dande, Lal-mirch powder” which had a "cascading effect leading to riots"
Hearing expected today at 10.30 AM.
BREAKING: Delhi High Court lists, UAPA accused, Gulshima Fatima's appeal from order rejecting bail for July 14.
Read 4 tweets
May 10
Delhi Court acquits 5 alleged Lashkar-e-Taiba (#LeT) members in a terror conspiracy case for lack of evidence.
CBI had arrested Mohd. Shahid, Mohd. Rashid, Ashabuddin, Abdul Subhan and Arshad Khan @ Masab on apprehension that in connivance with a #Pakistani man, they were planning to kidnap a rich businessman for ransom in order to finance #terrorist activities.
Subhan and his nephew Ashabuddin had been earlier convicted in a case wherein they were arrested in 2001 while carrying a consignment of RDX, AK56 rifles and other arms in Santhalpur, Gujarat.
Subhan had come out of jail in 2010 before getting arrested in this case in 2013.
Read 6 tweets
May 10
Supreme Court Bar Association to hold farewell function in Honour of Justice Vineet Saran, scheduled to demit his office today.
Senior Advocate Pradeep Rai during his welcome address to Justice Saran said that "I have seen him as a top lawyer of the Allahabad High Court and Judge of various High Courts and Supreme Court, he encourages the members of the Bar."
Justice Saran is very caring person and he is friend of friends, Your contribution to the institution will always be remembered, we'll not let you retire, Rai added.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(