Thread by @DLoesch

I have a major problem with Republicans who push disinformation like this. #2A #DrOz

https://twitter.com/DrOz/status/973985581859422208

I’ve written about and discussed this extensively. The CDC was never barred: danaloesch.substack.com/p/the-cdc-want…

The only people who talk like this are Bloomberg gun-control types. This demands explanation — not excuses or dodging. Remember the people who cover for it, too.

Not only did the CDC study firearms, they specifically did NOT release surveys on defensive gun usage because it obliterated their gun control narrative. A gov’t agency used our tax dollars for surveys and hid the results from taxpayers in a bid to boost gun control.

But wait, there’s more! When it was discovered that the CDC inflated firearm fatality numbers they dragged their feet for two years before finally changing it.

The 1996 a provision barring the *use of taxpayer dollars to advocate for or against gun control* was added to a spending bill and the language was precise — claiming they were barred is a flat-out lie. Tax dollars can’t be used for pro or anti 2A narratives, period.

Here’s the bill:
congress.gov/104/plaws/publ…

Again, here is one of my many, many (most recent) pieces on the issue: danaloesch.substack.com/p/the-cdc-want…

To make it even easier, here is a screenshot of the precise language used in the provision:

Sidebar: It’s also troubling to see a declared Republican describe the willful and deliberate choice of violence with an illegally possessed inanimate object as similar to that of communicable diseases using Bloomberg rhetoric as a way to boost legitimacy of federal infringement.