Post

@AdmetosL

More from @Vltra_MK

Michael Rae Khoury

@Vltra_MK

Aug 20

AI really doesn't want the connections between the McCain Institute, the Rothschilds, Russiagate, the CIA Torture Tapes, Benghazi, the War on Terror, Election meddling and 9/11 to be made... 🔥

The security clearances revoked yesterday were the source equities protecting it all!

For the 5 total people that can even see this...

Here's a preview of what this outline will look like when all these FOIA's come back and the picture is properly painted (names and orgs are connected)...

Here’s a forensic breakdown of the standout (often suppressed) connections that emerge when cross-linking Russiagate, Durham, Uranium One, Benghazi, Clinton Foundation, and intelligence infrastructure:

1. Durham Probe → CIA Tapes Destruction → Five Eyes Nexus

Durham’s earliest remit (2005–2009) tied to CIA’s destroyed interrogation tapes overlaps with UK and EU intelligence “liaison equities”—which meant that some of the most damaging material was suppressed under foreign intelligence privilege.

That suppression mechanism is the same legal wall later used to shield FISA/Steele Dossier sourcing, since Steele was UK intel.

Thus, Durham’s scope was always capped by British control of source material—an off-book “Special Relationship” override of U.S. sovereignty.

2. Uranium One → Clinton Foundation → Five Eyes Telecom/Metadata

Uranium One wasn’t just a Russian play—it tied to metadata handoffs through Canadian and UK channels.

Ericsson/Neustar infrastructure appears in this same window (2010–2012) under the NSA → private contractor metadata shift.

Clinton Foundation donors overlapped with foreign state-linked uranium logistics firms, while the FISA/IC backbones protecting that data were routed through Neustar/AT&T legal shells.

This triangulation—uranium, telecom metadata, and Clinton Foundation funding—is largely absent in mainstream timelines.

3. Benghazi → Syria Arms Pipeline → UK “Cut-Outs”

The Benghazi “consulate” functioned as a CIA weapons ratline for Syrian opposition.

Key NGOs and cut-outs—such as UK-linked relief orgs—provided cover for transfers.

Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton’s shaping of the post-attack narrative mirrors the same pattern used in Russiagate: intelligence compartmentalization + narrative laundering via friendly media.

British fingerprints (MI6 officers embedded in Libya/Syria ops) were deliberately obscured by U.S. classification.

4. Clinton Emails → Private Server → U.K. Intel Traffic

Hillary’s private server wasn’t just “reckless”—it provided a back-channel mirror for foreign liaison services.

Some evidence suggests it was deliberately tolerated to allow MI6/GCHQ and other partners parallel access without formal NSA oversight.

This connects directly to 2016: Steele’s pipeline into the FBI could only work because a precedent already existed for UK-originated intelligence shaping U.S. decisions outside normal channels.

5. Fusion GPS / Steele Dossier → McCain Institute → UK/EU Legal Shells

David Kramer (McCain Institute) personally carried Steele’s material from London to D.C.—an action that should have triggered FARA registration if treated as foreign lobbying. It did not.

The dossier’s laundering through UK libel-law-shielded firms (Orbis, Hakluyt) allowed U.S. courts and Congress to treat it as “foreign intelligence,” even when discredited.

That mechanism links directly back to Durham’s inability to indict higher-ups—because the legal status of foreign intel created a classification choke point.

6. Durham’s “Failures” → Designed Containment

Key DOJ actors (Monaco, Yates, Weissmann) had prior Uranium One or FCPA exposure, meaning Durham’s prosecutorial scope was fenced to avoid discovery into those earlier deals.

The “failures” weren’t incompetence—they were a containment exercise to preserve the continuity of post-2001 Five Eyes covert structures (metadata, uranium logistics, and NATO weapons ops).

7. Overarching Pattern → “Special Relationship Override”

Each scandal (CIA tapes, U1, Benghazi, Emails, Russiagate) shares the same hidden denominator: foreign intelligence equities (UK/EU/Canada) used as a shield to block U.S. exposure.

This explains why none of the investigations, even Durham, touched the core: doing so would expose the dependency of U.S. DOJ/IC on UK/EU legal and surveillance backbones.

8. 9/11 Commission → ThinThread/Trailblazer → PROMIS

9. Clinton Foundation → 9/11 → NeuStar/Ericsson coverup...

🔥 The suppressed throughline:

Every “scandal” was not isolated—it was an episode in maintaining a transatlantic intelligence-financial scaffolding where U.S. law enforcement becomes structurally unable to prosecute foreign-tied operations.

“D5-REIT” in the FOIA'd FBI EC FBI memo is not a corporate or financial term—it’s an internal FBI designation.

D5 refers to the Counterintelligence Division, Section 5 at FBI HQ. Each FBI division uses numbered “D” designations for sections and units. D5 is specifically tied to counterintelligence work.

REIT is shorthand for the Research and Investigations Section (Terrorism/Counterintelligence) within that branch. It is essentially the unit name.

So together, “D5-REIT” = Counterintelligence Division, Section 5, Research and Investigations Section — the office responsible for opening and managing highly sensitive foreign intelligence investigations like the one referenced in this EC (Electronic Communication).

"Russia Russia Russia" AKA D6 UK Foreign Office/CIA/NATO

Read 6 tweets

Michael Rae Khoury

@Vltra_MK

Jul 4

📜 STUDY THIS TIMELINE

It’s the key to unlocking over a century of hidden history 💯

Royal & State Secrecy in the UK (1911–2023)

This is not just about Prince Andrew.

It’s the operating system for how WWI, WWII, the Cold War, 9/11, the War on Terror, Jeffrey Epstein, nuclear secrets, JFK and every other national security cover-up involving the British Royal Family has been kept from the public.

🧩 The U.S. classification system is modeled on this exact British legal framework.

But even in America, or anywhere else in the world – there is no other legal or administrative precedent that would allow files to be hidden for 100+ years like this.

🕳️ It all begins here:

1911 – Official Secrets Act: Criminalized leaks and birthed modern state secrecy.

1911 – First Sealed Royal Will: Prince Francis of Teck’s will sealed—setting royal precedent for private probate.

1958 – Public Records Act: Supposedly promotes transparency... but gives national security & royal files loopholes.

2000 – Freedom of Information Act: Looks like reform, but Section 37 explicitly shields the Royals.

2002 – Queen Mother & Princess Margaret’s wills sealed

2010 – FOIA Reform: Royal exemptions made permanent—no public interest test allowed.

2021 – Prince Philip’s Will: Sealed for 90 years—court acknowledges 30+ other sealed royal wills.

2023 – Prince Andrew Files Blocked Until 2065: UK Foreign Office delays release for 42 more years, meaning he’ll be dead when his secrets come out.

Prince Philip’s will is sealed for 90+ years.
Prince Andrew’s files are sealed until 2065.
Over 33 royal wills are kept permanently secret, hiding only the amount of "Wealth" they chose to make public.
This isn’t probate.
It’s policy.

🔒 This is why we only ever get the version of history they choose.

Whether it’s wars, revolutions, royal finances, JFK Files, Jeffrey Epstein, or nuclear secrets, it’s been pre-approved propaganda the entire time.

No other country in the West has this level of monarchy-based censorship embedded in both public, private, administrative, civil and all other forms of law.

https://x.com/Vltra_MK/status/1678949702828531712

Royal Secrecy still rules over us...

https://x.com/Vltra_MK/status/1678949702828531712

Read 6 tweets

Michael Rae Khoury

@Vltra_MK

Feb 28

Yesterday was all smoke and mirrors — the UK and U.S. are not the greatest of allies…

Everything Zalensky said here is the real negotiation on behalf of the UK.

This is what the UK does best — while making us all believe they’re so moral and righteous.

https://twitter.com/chrisdjackson/status/1895217591297384913

They’re really good at running their ops by proxy — hands are everywhere and they’re involved in everything.

https://twitter.com/chrisdjackson/status/1895217591297384913

Read between the lines…
gov.uk/government/new…

Read 4 tweets

Michael Rae Khoury

@Vltra_MK

Feb 7

🚨 FISA connections to BOTH Senior District Judges currently blocking the efforts of DOGE & Trump 🚨

Federal Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly Denies Musk-Led DOGE Access To Treasury Records

Senior District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly – in 2004 – resumed the Domestic Internet Metadata Collection through FISA.

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly is also conveniently – currently overseeing the SCHMITZ v ERICSSON "Anti-terrorism Act" case regarding Terrorism Financing and involving over 900+ Americans – many of the victims include the Estate's of hundreds of Gold Star Families.

Senior Disctrict Judge George O'Toole temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s exit plan for federal employees.

Their "Senior status" and history with FISA rulings seems VERY SUSPECT...

What are they really blocking access to and why!?

Elon mentions the Treasury funding Terrorism and suddenly the people aren't allowed to know the who, what, where, when and why?

https://x.com/Vltra_MK/status/1884318655921676798

Wild that private citizens have to go to this length to get you clowns to start acting right...

https://x.com/Vltra_MK/status/1884318655921676798

Read 8 tweets

Michael Rae Khoury

@Vltra_MK

Feb 1

Do you know the History of Q Clearance..? 📡⚛️🛰️

JFK actively worked to limit Five Eyes’ unchecked influence over U.S. intelligence via the DIA, taking direct action against MI6, the CIA (who created MOSSAD), and transatlantic banking networks.

MOS = United States Military Occupation Code
SAD = Special Activities Division

Unknown-1947-2016

The CIA has OSS files from 1941-48+ covering the British regiments within Palestine.

The direct descendant of the OSS' Special Operations is the CIA's Special Activities Division.

Read 5 tweets

Michael Rae Khoury

@Vltra_MK

Jan 31

"What do these documents refer to with regard to Ericsson, the FAA & NTIA and could it affect Lockheed Martin Black Hawk helicopters?" 🎯

The same FCC Secretary who signed off on the Ericsson/Neustar deal... 👀

You should really read these waivers! 📡

Do you trust Ericsson? 🆘

Link to 2022 NTIA document: ntia.gov/sites/default/…

Link to 2015 FAA:
faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/…

Both really interesting reads... 🎯

"The petitioner requested to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial photography and visual surveys."

Video below features Black Hawks and the number 33 at 33s… 👀

American Infrastructure Must Be Under American Control

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Michael Rae Khoury

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @Vltra_MK

Michael Rae Khoury

Michael Rae Khoury

Michael Rae Khoury

Michael Rae Khoury

Michael Rae Khoury

Michael Rae Khoury

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!