Bar & Bench Profile picture
May 12 54 tweets 24 min read
#SupremeCourt to hear a batch of appeals and a fresh plea against verdicts of the Madras and Bombay HCs which dismissed challenges to the decision of the Centre to trade 5 per cent of its shareholding in Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) through an IPO #LIC #IPOAlert
Sr Adv Indira Jaising: please see the finance act of 2021. it is volume 2 milord @IJaising
Jaising: it makes amendments to the various acts including the LIC Act and I am concerned with amendments to LIC Act and Section 28 of the LIC Act. there has been extrapolation of surplus from the hands of shareholders to the policy holders. #LIC
Jaising: Earlier to this surplus was distributed among policy holders. There is participating and non participating policy holder. Prior to this amendment, law was 95 percent of entire surplus of LIC went to participating policy holders and 5 percent was with centre #LIC
Justice DY Chandrachud: when did the IPO open?

ASG Venkataraman: It opened on May 9, 2022

Jaising: who are you appearing for ?

ASG: The Union

Judges discuss #LIC
ASG: Please see two dates. Madras HC has decided the matter and Bombay HC rejected the interim application

DYC J: Issue regarding money bill has been referred to the Constitution bench and it has to go to 7 now. We will issue notice and tag it with that matter.
SC: We cannot grant any interim relief now. In matters of IPO court will be reluctant in grant interim relief. it is about investments.

Jaising: IPO opened on May 4. Allotment is due today
Jaising: If i have applied for share the money will be deposited in my own account, it is known as application supported by blocked account. the moment i submit money for application account is blocked and LIC has a lien on it #LIC
Jaising: my plea argues that there is a violation of Article 300A.

SC: Now shareholders will also come

Jaising: it is diverted to shareholders and not even to non participating policy holders. Prior to this amendment this money belonged to us
Jaising: the question that whether it is money bill or not is there but it also has to be seen if it violates 300A.

SC: You are entering merits of the case #LIC
Jaising: the word members here refer to shareholders. So my money is here being diverted to the shareholder

SC: But there is no guarantee that you will get 6 percent

Jaising: there was a statute which said I am entitled to 95 percent.

SC: That is why we are issuing notice
I am not on absolute quantum but on the percentage of it. Please let me complete my submissions. Such percentage of remaining surplus was to be allocated to members. Now in 75 years there is the first time definition of members as shareholders. outsiders become owners !: Jaising
Jaising: In their own red herring prospectus valued the IPO at 0.95 lacs and after amendment it was valued at 520 lakhs. #LIC
Jaising: this represents the projected future screens of income. when there was no diversion from my account it was 95 lakhs and now it is 520 lakhs

SC: Its lakhs or crores? crores !
Jaising: I am trying to explain the magnitude of the loss here. Please see the figure in black and white

SC: we take your word for it

#LIC
SC: Para 105 is a parliament discussion?

Jaising: it did not got to Rajya Sabha and was passed as a money bill

SC: no we are asking about the paragraph

#LIC
Jaising: Between March and sept there was a jump of 540 crores, where did the valuation change. where did this jump come from? it came from section 28 which was about bifurcation of fund which is now being diverted to shareholders. This money was meant for me (policyholders)
Jaising: My question is what happens to the due process of law. Have I been robbed of this amount and what happens to Article 21. I understand this is a Q of final hearing but now rights of third parties will come into play as allotment of share is today
Jaising: Right of shareholders will also be involved now. #LIC
Jaising: Speculative and windfall profits will be made now. There should be some sort of interim relief without affecting the rights of those who have applied for IPO. The money invested by them can be kept in blocked account and LIC will not suffer as they have lien #LIC
Jaising: either allotment does not happen or listing will not happen. I am confident we will succeed then there will be a question of returning the money. The legal personality of the corporation is different than the legal personality of Union of India. Question is who owns #LIC
Jaising: This corp has a face of mutual benefit society and now it is being changed. But they have to go through a process of demutualisation. No such process was undertaken towards the policy holders. Let money remain in blocked account. hear us on interim relief #LIC
Jaising: In case you are not inclined SC should make it clear that those who are purchasing it today their rights are dependent on the outcome of the case. this way atleast they will be put on notice. #LIC
Sr Adv Shyam Divan: we have referred to Roger Mathew as well. This deserves to go to the Constitution Bench. #LIC
ASG: Madras HC is final order, Bombay HC is interim order and here there is a writ as well. I appeared in both the High Courts. It was argued full day in Bombay HC. This is one of the biggest #IPO in the history of India and today there are 73 lakh applicants. #LIC
ASG: Third party rights have been created. Diversion is of 3.25 percent share and consolidated fund of India will receive 22,500 crores. there was over subscription in all the categories. #LIC
ASG: Please see the article 32 plea was filed on May 9 when the issue was closed. Now on Madras HC order was passed on March 21 and SLP filed after 50 days. Bombay HC April 13 open court order was dictated. From March 28, 2021, this act came into being, they waited for 15 months
ASG: This petition is just to scare investors and to play a spoilsport ! 73 lakh bank accounts are blocked. How can such important policy decisions be interfered with at the eleventh hour ! #LIC
ASG: Here only 2 shareholders out of 50,000 is before you. what is the criteria of interim order, where is the balance convenience or irreparable injury, who will compensate this? #LIC
ASG: There was not a sentence in policy which shows a contractual right on the 95 percent claim. Now see we are in market like others. we amended and said share holders will have a right. there is no guarantee of 95 percent for forever #LIC
ASG: Finance act draws a distinction between participating and non participating policy holders. Any interim order will send complete wrong signal to the markets and then any IPO can be interfered with. This is suddenly during allotment time #LIC
Jaising: I have a statutory right which is higher than a constitutional right!
#LIC
Jaising: March 4 is the first date when they exercised powers under finance act 2021 so there is no delay. we certainly represent the policyholders of #LIC so there is no question of Locus. Policyholders are the owners of LIC and today the company is changing hands!
Jaising: issue here is what is the legal character of LIC. If they convert to joint stock company they have to compensate through mutual benefit society and demutualisation. when you change your legal status what is your obligation to your former owners? #lic #IPO
Jaising: this kind of frivolity is unbecoming of Union of India

#LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC ORDER: This batch of cases consists a plea under article 32 and 2 slps arising from Bombay and Madras HC orders. the article 32 plea challenges the constitutional validity of provisions of sections 130, 131, 1441, and 144 of finance act 2021 & LIC Act

#LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC: Amendment to LIC Act was made through the finance act. LICs IPO red herring was made to SEBI for IPO on February 2022 and steps were taken on april 2022 and Sebi made the red herring available on its site.

#LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC: On April 27 a price band ad was published. Govt announced that LIC IPO will be open on may 2 for anchor investors and for others from May 4 to may 9, 2022. IPO has been closed for billing on May 9.
#LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC: The share price has to be finalised on May 12 which will be followed by allotment to the bidders. There are applications supported by blocked accounts and will be released on may 13 to unsuccessful investors #LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
successful investors will get share credited on May 16. two primary submissions have been urged on behalf of Ms Jaising for the article 32 plea that process which led to enactment of LIC Act was on the basis that it was a money bill: SC #LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
It has been question of money bill is referred to a larger bench and secod question is on merits of challenge that as a result of amendment to section 28 of LIC act the character of LIC which is a mutual benefit society is to be converted into joint stock company: SC
SC: This has been argued that extrapolation of surplus will be there. earlier participating shareholders got 95 percent of surplus and centre got 5 percent and now it stands amended thus violated 300A. #LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC: Though IPO closed on May 9 it has been urged that interim order will be needed. She submits that either monies submitted in ASBA accounts should be retained during pendency of this case or clairfy that investor rights will be dependent on outcome of this case #LIC #IPO
SC: Opposing the submission, ASG Venkataraman says while court may hear issues for further consideration, he has opposed grant of any interim relief #LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC: in our view the issues raised would merit further consideration particularly regarding Q of money bill which is pending before a constitution bench reference to Roger Mathew.

#LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC: Centre says Section 28 of LIC Act did not confer any contractual right on policy holders assuring 95 percent surplus and that it was for all material time dependent upon notification from centre and there was no statutory guarantee regarding distribution of quantum
SC: On the aspect on interim relief the court must be guided by well settled principle of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury. on first aspect we issue notice on the issue of passing of money bill.

#LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC: On section 28 submission by petitioner warrants further consideration. the court has been informed that 73 lakh applicants from India and globally have subscribed to the IPO and it has been over subscribed 6 times even by policy holders #LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC: It is imp to note percentage dilution of LIC has been 3.25 percent, 22.13 crore equity shares of value of 10 each is offered at Rs 939 and consolidated fund will receive 22.5 k crores. IPO opened for anchor investors on MAY 2 and others on may 4 and closed on may 9
SC: we are of the view that no case of interim relief has been made out. No interim relief granted. Notice on the writ petition and the SLPs filed. Counsels to formulate brief note on submissions. Reply in 4 weeks and counter after that in 4 weeks

#LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
SC: The pending proceedings will be tagged with the proceedings before the Constitution Bench on the aspect of money bill. #LIC #IPO #IPOUpdate
[BREAKING] Supreme Court refuses interim relief in challenge to LIC IPO; issues notice

report by @DebayonRoy

#LIC #LICIPO #SupremeCourtofIndia

barandbench.com/news/supreme-c…
"In matters of IPO, court will be reluctant in granting interim relief," Supreme Court

Read more here: bityl.co/CAze

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

May 12
Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court will shortly hear a petition seeking a direction to ASI to open doors of over 20 rooms inside the Taj Mahal premises so that the alleged controversy related to the “history of Taj Mahal” can be put to rest
A bench of Justices DK Upadhyay and Subhash Vidyarthi will be hearing the Tajmahal matter shortly.

#Tajmahal
Bench Assembles

#Tajmahal
Read 42 tweets
May 12
#SupremeCourt to hear appeal by TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee against a Delhi HC order dismissing their petition seeking quashing of summons issued to them in a money-laundering probe linked to an alleged coal scam in West Bengal @abhishekaitc @dir_ed
Hearing begins.

Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: This matter- in Nalini Chidambaram the same issue arose and Justices passed an order saying that the interim order in the HC will continue.

#SupremeCourt
Sr Adv Sibal: in any case, this is a matter you'd like to consider.

Justice Lalit: What happened after this order?

Sibal: Nothing happened. Matters are still pending.

#SupremeCourt
Read 29 tweets
May 11
#Breaking Justice Rajiv Shakdher of Delhi High Court expresses his regret that he was not able to persuade Justice C Hari Shankar to strike down the marital rape exception in IPC.
#DelhiHighCourt #MaritalRape #JusticeRajivShakdher
"He (Justice Hari Shankar), perhaps, hears a beat of a different drummer. I respect that," J Shakdher says in his judgment.
#DelhiHighCourt #MaritalRape #Section375IPC
To the petitioners, J Shakdher says, "it may seem that you plough a lonely furrow today but it will change, if not now, some day."
#MaritalRape #DelhiHighCourt #Section375IPC
Read 15 tweets
May 11
CBI files FIR against Home Ministry officials, Consultancy Companies and Private NGOs who were allegedly used to route FCRA funds, promise to get FCRA approvals.

#FCRA #CBI #NGOs
CBI has alleged that a network of people in Delhi, TN, Jharkhand, North East perpetrated this scam along with Home Ministry officials in the FCRA department.

#FCRA #CBI #NGOs
The FIR also alleges promoters "NGO Omidiyar" as one of the accused.

@pierre @OmidyarNetwork @on_india
Read 4 tweets
May 11
#MaritalRape: Delhi High Court to pronounce its judgement on the Marital Rape case today at 2.15 pm

Judges Rajiv Shakdher and C Hari Shankar to deliver.

Follow for LIVE Updates

#DelhihighCourt #DelhiHC @karunanundy @jsaideepak
#MaritalRape: What lawyers argued before Delhi High Court on the marital rape case

Read: bit.ly/3M4EGoW1

#DelhihighCourt #DelhiHC @karunanundy @jsaideepak
#MaritalRape: Bench of Justices Rajiv Shakdher and C Hari Shankar have assembled.

Lawyers @karunanundy @jsaideepak and others are also present in the Court room.

#DelhihighCourt #DelhiHC @karunanundy @jsaideepak
Read 8 tweets
May 11
[Sedition Challenge]

Can future cases under sedition law be put on hold while Centre completes re-examination of Section 124A of IPC?

Central government to clarify its stand before the #SupremeCourt shortly

#Sedition @HMOIndia #Section124A
#SupremeCourt on Tuesday had asked the Central government whether it can issue a direction to the States to keep in abeyance all pending #sedition cases till the government's exercise of reviewing Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is complete
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(