The short note shows that foreign term spreads (3m10s) constructed from non-US G7 constituents contain information about future US recessions *even after* accounting for the predictive content of the US term spread and several other leading indicators 2/5
Not just recession risk, but steeper (flatter) US *and* foreign term spreads are associated with faster (slower) future real GDP growth in the US 3/5
Why? foreign yields seem to inform US recession risk due to both:
A) Common factors underlying globally synchronized economic activity reflected in yield curves around the world
B) Spillovers: non-US recessions, led by foreign yield curves, are partially exported to the US
4/5
What it means: not all US yield curve inversions are alike. Flatter US yield curves alongside flatter foreign yield curves may indicate greater recession risk than flatter US yield curves in isolation
As always - comments welcome!
5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨JOB MARKET PAPER THREAD #EconTwitter 🚨 I’m an empirical macroeconomist and I'm on the job market this year. My JMP develops a measure of global financial 'flights-to-safety’ and explores their macro implications 1/n [Link to my site and JMP: sites.google.com/view/rashad-ah…]
Flights-to-Safety (FTS) or 'risk-off' episodes refer to the observation of aggressive rotation from risk assets into safe assets amid sharply higher volatility. They’re usually triggered by unexpected tail events (e.g. COVID-19, U.S.-China trade war, Brexit) 2/n
By defining a global FTS as occurring on days when: Equity prices and UST yields drop + volatility and credit spreads rise + FX carry unwinds - all at the same time - I can aggregate info across asset classes to arrive at a series of global FTS shocks (details in the paper) 3/n