Integrity and climate change are key #Election22 issues because the @ScottMorrisonMP government has failed dismally on both.
But what if they were actually the same issue?
To quote ‘The Wire’, everything is connected.
Here’s a thread…
🧵#auspol#wreckingcrew
There is no doubting the Morrison government’s utter failure to deliver effective climate action.
There’s no credible plan, no credible target, no credible mechanism and a global reputation for obstruction.
Here’s an earlier thread which sets it out:
There is also no doubt about issues with public integrity.
Australia has been singled out by Transparency International for ‘systemic failings in tackling public sector corruption’.
Here’s an earlier thread which sets it out:
An overwhelming majority of Australians want real climate action.
The science is clear & unequivocal - we are in an emergency.
And we have all the policy & technical solutions we need.
So how do we explain Morrison’s inaction? Let’s dig into this… climateworksaustralia.org/resource/decar…
The short answer is that our democratic system has malformed.
Vested interests have deviated government and other public institutions away from the public good, to short-term private gain.
Let’s dig into this...
There are different kinds of corruption.
First, there’s plain crookedness: unlawful private gain from public office. Some well known identities have gone down for this, but it’s uncommon.
After all, why take the risk of criminal activity, if you can get what you want lawfully?
Because weird as it sounds, not all ‘corruption’ is unlawful.
‘Institutional corruption’ occurs when vested interests use influence - in ways which may be perfectly legal - to divert public institutions away from their purpose to favour private interests: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
'Institutional corruption' - in the form of corporations using influence strategically to divert government away from the public interest - is both lawful and rife in Australia.
In particular, institutional corruption to prevent our rapid clean energy transition has been organised and persistent.
As @MrKRudd said, big polluters have run ‘sophisticated political operations’ to thwart climate action: theguardian.com/environment/20…
So how does ‘institutional corruption’ work? Well, there are plenty of perfectly lawful levers. Most obviously, fossil fuel corporations are lucrative donors to political parties and candidates: theguardian.com/environment/20…
And lots of the money that changes hands is never disclosed at all.
Research by @cpi_aus counted $1.5 billion dollars in
secret contributions to federal political parties in the last twenty years: publicintegrity.org.au/source-of-1-5-…
So, what do you get for a donation?
According to @humanrightsHRLC ‘at the very least, a sizeable donation can ensure the donor gets meetings with a politician that ordinary Australians wouldn’t’: static1.squarespace.com/static/580025f…
Political donations & lobbying go hand-in-glove. @DrAdamLucas found fossil fuel corporations had ‘constructed a covert network of lobbyists & revolving door appointments… ensur[ing] industry interests continue to dominate Australia’s energy policy’: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Remember the 80s banger, ‘Things That Make You Go Hmmmm…’?
Well, it turns out that donations from fossil fuel corporations ‘correlate with the election cycle, timelines on project approvals, and debates on key industry policies'.
Hmmmm... static1.squarespace.com/static/580025f…
As an example, the good folk at @AusConservation revealed that gas corporations were the biggest fossil fuel donors, with their donations spiking at the same time as Morrison committed to a ‘gas-fired recovery’:
Hmmmm… acf.org.au/political_dona…
Key to all of this is what is known as the ‘revolving door’, in which individuals move from roles as legislators, political advisers and public servants - to jobs with corporate vested interests - and sometimes back again: static1.squarespace.com/static/5eaac47…
The evidence shows that ‘companies that employ former government officials are more successful at getting meetings with government
representatives, and are more likely to get a sympathetic audience’: static1.squarespace.com/static/580025f…
And it goes the other way too….
According to @CallumDRFoote, the Morrison government has ‘stacked Australia’s renewable energy agencies with fossil fuel executives’: michaelwest.com.au/scott-morrison…
And it is not just individual appointments - entire public institutions can be ‘repurposed’ to serve the aims of vested interests - and agencies start to understand their task as expediting approvals and enabling polluters: static1.squarespace.com/static/5eaac47…
From a selfish politicians’ perspective, there’s plenty to be gained from getting all nice and cosy - in a perfectly lawful way - with coal, oil and gas corporations.
Most obviously, as @crikey_news put it: ‘political parties need money’: crikey.com.au/2021/03/17/mon…
Fossil fuel corporations can also - perfectly legally - offer lucrative employment and board opportunities for ex politicians - what @DrAdamLucas dubbed ‘the golden escalator’: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Fossil fuel corporations can also be helpful to sitting politicians by providing ‘announceables’ - even when (climate and environmental impacts to one side) the numbers don’t stack up: australiainstitute.medium.com/explained-adan…
Fossil fuel corporations can also offer politicians the opportunity for some self-interested cosplay - the chance to wear high-viz vests in a bid to make themselves look more interesting and electable: crikey.com.au/2021/10/19/mat…
Then there’s the dinners, the corporate boxes, the events, to which fossil fuel corporations can invite politicians and other decision makers, perfectly legally.
For example, Woodside Meg O'Neill is closely connected with @WASymphony and @freodockers: linkedin.com/in/meg-o-neill…
So, lots of perfectly legal benefits to be had from cosy relationships between politicians and fossil fuel corporations.
And it all gets normalised as 'how things get done around here’ in what @DrCameronMurray and @FrijtersPaul call ‘the game of mates’: gameofmates.com
But there’s a final kicker:
The pervasive institutional corruption that has thwarted effective climate action in Australia, also serves a deeper, extreme ideological purpose - the 'wrecking crew' agenda:
When policy, approvals, agencies, regulations, laws - all get deviated from the public good to benefiting vested interests, then people know the fix is in.
This destroys confidence in government and corrodes the very idea of the public good - and that’s the ‘wrecking crew’ agenda
And the ‘wrecking crew’ agenda also suits the big polluters.
After all, the whole business model of the coal, oil and gas corporations, depends on: (1) extracting private gain from public resources (2) driving increasingly catastrophic climate change.
So it should come as no surprise that the fossil fuel industry has some deep ties with the ‘wrecking crew’ ideologues.
As @DeSmog put it ‘the climate denial movement is the anti-science wing of the neoliberal network’: desmog.com/node-8441/
It is well known that coal mining billionaire Gina Rineheart is - and to be clear, there is nothing remotely unlawful about this - a very generous funder of the @TheIPA: thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/…
What all of this adds up to, is that the reason why we don’t have real climate action in Australia is because of the - perfectly lawful - ‘institutional corruption’ of our system of government by vested interests.
The ‘institutional corruption’ itself is nested within a broader Fossil Fuel Order - an interlocking array of political, economic, legal, social, cultural and ideological structures. But that is a conversation for another day: arena.org.au/empire-of-the-…
The silver lining to all of this is that tackling ‘institutional corruption’ and transitioning from dirty fossil fuels to clean renewables at emergency speed and scale, are mutually reinforcing, as part of a project of national renewal.
So, enough is enough.
Time to boot coal, oil and gas out of our energy system.
Time to boot the vested interests out of the halls of our democracy.
Let’s create the conditions for a flourishing Australia. #auspol
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today it was confirmed that 91% of the Great Barrier Reef was impacted by mass bleaching in 2022.
In light of this terrible news, it is worth examining in detail the record of @ScottMorrisonMP's government - and the failure to take action to protect the Reef.
Here's a 🧵 #auspol
First, let’s remember: under the UNESCO treaty, Australia promised to do its 'utmost' to protect the Reef.
The Reef’s greatest threat is climate change, driven by burning coal, oil & gas. So our politicians have a duty to act on climate change to protect the Reef.
Let’s start back in May 2019, when Scott Morrison stated that the Coalition government had ‘saved the Great Barrier Reef’.
Countless scientific studies at the time and since have shown the scale of this untruth. theguardian.com/environment/20…
Turmoil at @AGLAustralia reached new levels this week, with major and costly power outages, and @mcannonbrookes buying a major shareholder stake and opposing demerger plans.
How has $AGL - a company with such an incredible history - reached this crisis point? 🧵: #ausbiz
To start, a reminder - @AGLAustralia is our country’s biggest climate polluter. $AGL alone is responsible for almost a tenth (over 8%) of our annual domestic greenhouse gas emissions. To protect our climate it is imperative AGL shifts its business model.
There has been ample opportunity for $AGL to transition its business model away from the destruction of our planet. Instead, AGL has resisted change and ignored the clear shift in the global energy market, consumer expectations - and the scientific warnings.
Australia has been singled out by Transparency International for ‘systemic failings in tackling public sector corruption’.
Morrison government rorts have gone beyond individual scandals to become something far worse - the strategic wrecking of our system of government:
🧵#auspol
In a previous thread I argued that Morrison & co are ‘wrecking crew’ politicians, actively trashing expectations of government and the idea of the public good.
In this thread, I’ll argue that rorting is core ‘wrecking crew’ behaviour.
Let’s start with definitions.
According to the @MacqDictionary, ‘rort’ is Australian slang that means ‘to swindle or dupe’.
Typically, ‘a rort is all about manipulating the system to gain a wrongful advantage’: macquariedictionary.com.au/blog/article/7…
This week EVs emerged as a key #election2022 issue.
Australia is a terrible global laggard on electric vehicle uptake.
And if we stick with the current ‘strategy’ of @ScottMorrisonMP’s we are going to stay that way. Here's why🧵: #auspol
First, the Morrison government has refused to implement fuel efficiency standards, requiring cars to become cleaner over time. This is a tried and tested EV uptake tactic & the bare minimum - adopted by more than 80% of the global vehicle market: abc.net.au/news/2021-10-1…
Thanks to these lax environmental standards - which have been called out by global auto-makers time and time again - there is no reason for manufacturers to ship to Australia, and no reason to invest at home: abc.net.au/news/science/2…
This week the Morrison government appointed a bunch of ‘mates’ to key statutory positions. Much of the commentary has focused on nepotism - which is fair enough because it is pretty revolting.
But I reckon this is just another step in a deliberate wrecking agenda 🧵: #auspol
First, some background. This week the Morrison government was criticised for appointing ‘mates’ to key public service positions. Some former Coalition MPs & staffers were given high-paying jobs on the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, for example: sbs.com.au/news/article/g…
This is not the first time the Morrison government (and previous governments) have done this. @crikey_news has been particularly vigilant in covering the issue. Here’s another five handed out by Christian Porter when he was Attorney General, for example: crikey.com.au/2020/12/21/aat…
Yesterday, UN chief @antonioguterres singled out Australia as a climate action ‘holdout’ in the wake of the #IPCCReport & its call to urgently speed up emissions cuts.
Why? World leaders are fed up with @ScottMorrisonMP's ruinous history of inaction & blocking progress:🧵#auspol
There is a long, dismal history of the Morrison ‘blocker’ government.
Basics first. The biggest cause of the climate crisis is the mining & burning of coal, oil & gas.
The govt has zero plans to actively phase out these polluting fossil fuels: google.com/amp/s/theconve…
When exports & what is burned at home are combined, Australia is the world’s fifth-worst polluter. Morrison’s refusal to commit to phasing these out, in line with the IEA & IPCC calls means we are making an oversized contribution to climate change: theguardian.com/environment/20…