#epitwitter Just heard from JTB that our #COVID19 paper was the most downloaded in last 90 days. I plan to spend summer developing projects that build on same concepts and methods. Happy to accommodate collaborations with those interested. Just send note. journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-the…
Broader scope viewpoints article outlining effects and inferences of unobserved variation in disease dynamics just updated on arXiv: arxiv.org/abs/2009.01354
Selection on individual variation in susceptibility or exposure to causative factors of disease (contagious or not) introduces biases when not considered in analysis.
Common errors include the following:
1- Overestimated R0 for endemic diseases, and overpredicted intervention impacts; 2- Overpredicted herd immunity thresholds (and epidemic final sizes for epidemic diseases, and overestimated intervention effects; 3- Overestimation of individual reinfection rates;
4- Overestimation of waning immunity.
Given that individual variation cannot be observed in its entirety we propose a method for its inference from patterns of disease. The method relies on "unfolding selection" along gradients.
It's been applied to malaria, TB and covid to infer human variation, to dengue and viruses of flies to infer insect variation and Wolbachia effects, to viruses of fish to infer fish variation and vaccine effects, and is being applied to human pathogens to infer vaccine efficacy.
The paper above provides references, but hopefully many more on these and other effects (beyond disease dynamics) will emerge over years to come.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/14 Dear #epitwitter,
Our first peer reviewed #COVID modelling paper has just been made available online by the grand classic Journal of Theoretical Biology 🙏authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S00…
Others will follow shortly I believe.
2/14 Joined this platform in June 2019 to say some forms of individual variation impact epidemic dynamics hugely. Not all variation matters and explanation isn’t "nonlinearities this and that". Key process can be described linearly, intuitively, and quantifiably by inference.
3/14 When covid-19 emerged I couldn’t but apply concepts and new inference procedures to the pandemic. Also couldn’t but communicate results through this and other platforms.
This post summarises concepts, results, how they were received, and how mission has been accomplished.
Almost 2 years since our low-HIT (herd immunity threshold) preprint was released the paper has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a scientific journal (specific details soon).
Following the initial preprint submitted to medRxiv in April 2020 the theory that individual variation in susceptibility and exposure (frailty variation) to infection lowers HIT and epidemic final size was featured in many news and science outlets, eg:
Two years ago had privilege to be: offered/accepting Global Talent Research Professorship at Strathclyde University @StrathMathStat; awarded Habilitation from Porto University. Both in recognition for research/teaching variation/selection in epidemiology/ecology/evolution.
Then pandemic emerged and took all time/attention. A lot has been sacrificed but I believe for good causes: research-wise immediately; policy-wise may take longer.
Then decided to write thread about what's killing me. Not depressing (on contrary). It's my duty to make the world understand this +ve thing before I die [not that I think I'll die soon; that was just in dream]
PLEASE READ IF YOU CAN!
For more than 10 years I've been researching with collaborators (including @mlipsitch@GrahamMedley) why epidemic models tend to exaggerate epidemic sizes and overestimate intervention impacts (particularly vaccines but also NPIs): journals.plos.org/plospathogens/…
1/ Many times I have been asked why communication around herd immunity threshold (HIT) was so confusing in this pandemic. I have even been asked whether experts really understand it. Here is my answer:
2/ The concept is well understood among mathematical epidemiologists. In my view what went terribly wrong was the politicised way in which the HIT was used in this pandemic.
3/ The HIT is the percentage of the population that needs to be immune (prior to vaccination immunity was a natural outcome of recovery from infection) before the epidemic peaks and subsides.