Post

@HuttonPulitzer

@JovanHPulitzer

@FannKfann

@brnoforaz

@AZHouseGOP

@JovanHPulitzer

@stephen_richer

@stephen_richer

@stephen_richer

More from @AzPinkLady

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Oct 26

I was reading through the latest ruling for the Mississippi lawsuit (ballots accepted after Election Day).

documentcloud.org/documents/2525…

This really is a great read on the history of mail in ballots & makes a fabulous argument for why ballots are not legal to be accepted after Election Day.

The bottom line is they reversed the lower court’s decision & are sending it back down to the district court to come up with a remedy. And telling the lower court to consider “the value of preserving the status quo in a voting case on the eve of an election." We are now required to demonstrate “
"(1) that it has suffered an irreparable injury; (2) that remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for that injury; (3) that, considering the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in equity is warranted; and (4) that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction."

So it remains to be seen what will end up happening.

But… I noticed something even more fascinating…

They also make a great argument for Election “DAY”. Even though they cover changes that have been made over the years to extend “making a selection”.

And I think they just gave a legal reasoning on rerunning our elections when the boiling point of @PatrickByrne findings reach a level that the entire country understands we are using Venezuela Smartmatic infused voting machines that are coded in Serbia, With China parts assembled in Taiwan.

As a side note: The 5 yo little boy in me finds it hilarious to draw the comparison when the judge refers to consummated elections. Because we all have felt “F*cked” by our elections. 🤣

I digress.

Next posts have my supporting reasoning.

1 of 5

The judge refers to two statutes that

1) "The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors" for President. In 1792 Congress had set a 34 day period "preceding the first Wednesday in December in every fourth year." Some states adopted multi day voting. But it “caused election fraud, delay, and other problems.”

🤔 kinda sounds like what we have with a month of early voting, mail in ballots & weeks to get to results.

2) The state determines the time, manner & place of elections for Federal races BUT “the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations." “It also vests "power" in Congress to "alter those [state] regulations or supplant them altogether."”

Supplant = supersede or replace

In the early days of our Republic (not a democracy) states held elections at different times. Giving “"undue advantage" of "indicating to the country the first sentiment on great political questions."”

🤔 Kinda sounds like early voting. Did we just prove by voting early that it can sway sentiment, polls & cause the candidates to alter their course?

The judge summarizes that these statutes “"mandate[] holding all elections for Congress and the Presidency on a single day throughout the Union."” And subsequently refers to “Election Day” as a “ singular day established by federal law as the time for choosing members of Congress and presidential electors.”

2 of 5

The judge goes on to explain his ruling under the auspices of those statutes.

The judge clarifies that the State can make decisions on how to run Federal Elections unless Congress disagrees…

“States can regulate many elements of federal elections, "but only so far as Congress declines to preempt state legislative choices."”

Congress can “override state regulations by establishing uniform rules for federal elections, binding on the States.”

🤔 aren’t states currently running their elections with different rules?

And the judge covers that the Feds are not usurping state power. The original intent of the law was always to allow Congress to step in if need be & for a narrow topic:

“…the Elections Clause affects only an area in which the states have no inherent or reserved power: the regulation of federal elections…”

The judge goes into detail about explaining the definition of “election” which contains three elements: “(1) official action,
(2) finality, and (3) consummation.”

In discussing point 1, he points out that:

“The Supreme Court has said "the word [election] now has the same general significance as it did when the Constitution came into existence — final choice of an officer by the duly qualified electors."”

👁️ Not Citizens. We elect our electors through the parties. And the PCs vote for the National Delegates. These delegates all meet with the other state’s national delegates & cast votes. Until someone gets 50% + 1 of the electoral votes (Each state has so many according to their population- another topic for another day).

In Az, these Delegates are duty bound to vote for the popular vote (will of the people) on the first round. But, some states are not. Theoretically, political game play can happen. Those not bound can vote different than their popular vote, siting convictions, Hitler, yadda, yadda, on the first round & screw up the first round of voting freeing the delegates that are duty bound to vote someone else.

Theoretically, Trump could loose the presidency through this game play.

That’s why “Trump bound every round” was who we voted in for Arizona. It’s also why the traitor LaCivita targeted Shelby & other states with lies.

This is a really good time to plug becoming a PC!

I digress…

My guess the judge did not address the National Electors actually voting in the Prez because it wasn’t germane to the question at hand.

The court goes on to pointout (pic 4) that voters make “selections” & an election is when those selections are considered as a whole.

“So the election concludes when the final ballots are received and the electorate, not the individual selector, has chosen.”

🤔 Can elections be concluded if all the selections are not received…say from interruption?

3 of 5

Read 5 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Jun 14

Another Spaulding source of reference has crumbled. Add that to the list of Hamilton 68, NewKnowledge & First Draft. Check out @mtaibbi #CTILFiles & #TwitterFiles for more - I believe @pepesgrandma has researched them further. These folks are THE treasurer trove of research the makes the whole house of Russia disinformation cards crumble.

You can easily search their posts for hashtags or key words listed above. Remember to check out how CTIL made an CIA trained army to “combat” Russia disinformation with tactics used to interfere in foreign countries.

Obviously Spaulding doesn’t follow them. 🤣

All Spaulding’s sources to scare judges are bullshit. And even though the Az Disinformation Task Force couldn’t find any disinformation (screenshot for Task Force 7/2020 meeting minutes) that was ok. They greatly used Spaulding’s work products & wording for the report. I will guide you through that claim as we go along.

And yet…Spaulding is still pushing the bullshit lie that the judiciary is under attack.

“Courts and the election are on a collision course”. Which election, Spaulding? Will 2020 finally get it’s day in court?

And she’s still pushing her bullshit on state bars across the united states.

The show must go on, right Spaulding?

The best thing any bar, judge or attorney can do is loose her number.

And legislators would do their stares justice by removing the power for the Bar to discipline judge’s & attorneys. They deserve their day in court just as any citizen. It is imperative we keep the judicial system neutral from influence. The Bar’s ability to intimidate judges & attorneys that will have any effect on the decisions they make.

@JohnKavanagh_AZ @anthonykernAZ @Wadsack4Arizona @WendyRogersAZ
@Leo4AzHouse
@SelinaBliss
@realAlexKolodin
@DaveMarshallAZ
@QuangNguyenAZ
@JWilloughbyAZ you may want to pay attention to this thread

Come along with me….

Listen to Suzanne Spaulding describe why the commission she was on was called “Solarium”. She is speaking to a panel about the Cybersecurity Solarium Commission- to talk about the report she was a “leading voice” on, that provide steps forward to combat “Russia disinformation” which included pre-written legislation, ready tor the floor, which resulted in CISA getting more power & more money.

Indulge me as I take you on a journey from the Az Disinformation Task Force to Dwight Eisenhower & his Russia “Project Solarium” to develop an “effective strategy to respond to Soviet Expansion” & come along for a thought stream afterwards, then re-listen come back to this first post & re-listen to her describe Eisenhower’s “Project Solarium” through the lenses I will clean for you.

👇🏻

I couldn’t put the nice little video provided to me, in the above post, that the source was lucky enough to capture Spaulding in the only meeting she attended. Which happened to be 8/2020, just before the final report for the study phase of the task force was produced. This is a significant capture of information because the meeting minutes do not provide the context & depth of understanding as these raw videos.

I thought about editing them to make the videos more palatable, but thought it best to leave raw. However, I did edit to maintain the anonymity of the source.

Here is a video of Patience Huntwork identifying “hate speech” & an opinion that jury duty is a waste of time as items for “disinformation” & Spaulding’s response is that they use that as an indicator that the message is out there & needs combating.

Do you remember from the task force thread who Patience Huntwork is? Long time anti- Russian activist that helps Ukraine in their elections (no way CIA doesn’t know about this 😉)

And if you remember, Elizabeth Rindskopf-Parker, Spaulding’s right hand man in this “mission set” as Spaulding describes it, helped Brutinel select the academia to put on the task force. Listen to Brutinel explain how the task force came to be, within it, he reveals parker helped him…

Remember, Spaulding is an ex-CIA & Senate Select Intelligence Committee council who founded CISA & left CISA to go to CSIS - huge policy driver of our country - specifically to combat Russia going after our courts. “mission set”…odd way to put it, don’t you think?

You can read more about her on my task force thread.

Source tor “mission set”

And how influential was the anti-Russian, pro Ukrainian, anti-judge hate speech hunter on the report? Significant. Hear Spaulfing describe it as so much she thought “Huntwork is working on this” noted in the drafts was a company.

BTW…why is Spaulding getting drafts of the reports? 🤔 Monitor it’s progress? Perhaps she came to the 8/2020 meeting to get them on track & provide them with documents & wording to beef up their report & get the product she can use to take to other courts. 🤔

Keep following along - that thought won’t seem so far off when I’m done.

This is going to be a long thread. I will add to it often.

Bookmark & check back.

More 👇🏻

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1694416403355566172?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1694125000503255331?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1730602715825451408?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

To really understand what happened with the Task Force, we must understand what disinformation Spaulding was using to convince judges that Russia was undermining democracy by going after our courts.

First, she sites a case in Germany called the “Lisa case” or “Lisa F” case.

When I originally captured a Wikipedia page of this story, it was completely sourced. It had all sides of the story & clearly pointed to conflicting information. In particular, the parents’ assertion that she had been abused & showed physical signs of it. In addition, she was interrogated for 3 hours without her parents, & reported to them she was coerced into changing het story.

Since then, Wikipedia has removed that version, even from wayback & replaced it with one that aligns with Spaulding’s take.

I know 🤦🏻‍♀️. My mistake for 1) using Wikipedia, and 2) not capturing it on video & saving all the sources. I learned my lesson Spaulding…don’t expect that to happen again.

As you know, I have been quiet. I’m busy in the background. And I have learned that I will not publish any part of what I know, what I’m looking at, what resources I’m saving because, for example, my teaser on CISA & their “next moves” resulted in them removing that podcast. Guess what goons, I have it captured. 🤣

As you can see, my old link got redirected to their new version.

Old link is on this post

You can read tor yourself how they changed the story from my screenshots to now. It’s what “they” do - rewrite history

The bottom line to this story, since I can no longer find the links to the parents interview, is that RT sued an outfit in Germany for lying about RT & falsely accusing them of starting the protest.

I know it seems ironic to post a source from RT when Spaulding is saying they are spewing lies.

Here’s the thing, RT “American Lawyer” show she claims is really beating is our courts is an AMERICAN. I checked out his stories. He was giving the other side of the story that America wouldn’t produce. He was posting about the information we now know to be true about covid & the vaccine, he rightfully questioned the courts, various criminal cases, etc. Spaulding uses a pucture of herself on his show as confirmation he spreads disinformation… as if to say “see, I’m a great person & he’s talking about me”. 🤣

What about Twin Falls?

More 👇🏻

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1744238654405644469?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

rt.com/news/532396-rt…

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1780937097471516882?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

Read 49 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Mar 22

The info bring exposed is so explosive the bad guys are in over drive.

They are D-O-N-E

This is a really good lead in to the information I was working on to share with you.

@PatrickByrne did a locals on 3/21 - I put todays date on the video clips 🤪

Although I believe this info is not behind a subscription paywall, he is well worth $5 a month. This money goes directly to funding this fight. He revealed a lot of information - but I want to address this topic in particular & give you pieces of video to share. Ask the BOS, Richer, Hobbs & fraud denying legislators why they”appealed to a higher authority” & didn’t investigate legitimate concerns.

Ask them why they obstructed. Were they part of it?

There was SOMEONE on the ground that made the boxes “match” the audit. 🤔

Follow along & you’ll understand why I say that.

👇🏻

Byrne has let us know SCOTUS has a nice package that proves A) the Dominion system is 💩. So bad it is “had to be” designed that way. B) that the elections were fraudulent & C) data was manipulated- untraceable.

This gives Richer & the rest of them plausible deniability. I’m not saying they were involved. But someone made the data & the paper match.

What it does not do is excuse them from upholding their oath. They have a DUTY to investigate. Not just take CISA/CIA/FBI word for it. They had a DUTY to open up their systems & go through them with a fine tooth comb. They had a DUTY not to obstruct.

This little video is a lead in to the rest of the thread I’ll do. I may get interrupted.

There is more 👇🏻

Three things Byrne discussed:
1). The Rijndael key left in plain text in the database.

2) system behavioral files that can be tweaked to favor one candidate over another

3) software that was changed from the certified version. (Maricopa secret “L&A”? 19” ballot definitions?)

More 👇🏻

Read 9 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Jan 31

Can’t make this stuff up folks.

@billgatesaz & @stephen_richer sitting on an org with Mossad asset linked to the subversion of our courts.

We also linked Toma through connections to this same Mossad character.

It’s no wonder these jokers snub citizens! They think they will get away with this.

Check out the other list of characters.

I want to clarify “mossad character”

It has been speculated that Michael Chertoff is connected to Zionism & Mossad through his family.

And I connected Michael Chertoff to Susan Spaulding (#AzTaskForce thread) and to Ben Toma.

The above posts @DecentFiJC connected Richer & BOS Bill Gates to Chertoff

So I thought I’d add context to the above post.

Chertoff’s mother is undisputed first stewardess of El Al Israel Airlines. There are many resources that confirm this. I’ve checked the sources that don’t resolve to the same source. It will become clear later why I took the time to confirm this 1 piece of information. Here are the sources:

1. pro Palestinian “Middle East Monitor by Maidhc Ó Cathail
“The Merchants of Fear: Israel Profits from Homeland Insecurity” - Maidhc Ó Cathail died in 2017. In a tribute article he is said to be honest & “painstaking” researcher.

2. Book written by Jack Kitaeff “Jews in Blue” - Jack Kitaeff is a professor of criminology with a JD & PHD. He has written many books.

3. A book written by Johnathan Cook “Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East” is quoted in several articles. Johnathan Cook is an independent researcher/journalist that is not a fly by night journalist.

4. Several resources that resolved back to an article by Christopher Bollyn “Controlled Press Hides Chertoff's Israeli Roots” - Christopher Bollyn is an independent investigator of government coverups, etc. he’s been labeled a “conspiracy theorist” by Rupert Murdoch, at the helm of ADL at the time. Perhaps because he is said to have solved 9/11 & found Zionist Jews involved?

His website is a whole other rabbit hole.

He’s “disappeared”. His last post on his site was march 2017. One site said they hadn’t heard from him since 2017.

2 guys who aren’t here anymore both gone in 2017 & both who were investigator/journalists exposing 9/11 & the Zionist Israel link. 🤔 what are the odds?

I didn’t post reviews, works, etc because that’s not the point. You can research each of them if you so choose.

More 👇🏻bollyn.com/about-christop…

Here is the claim, from above, in Wikipedia. I selected this source to show you because there is relevant information in one screenshot

Take note of 3 things from this pic from Wikipedia:

1. Michael Chertoff was born in 53
2. Mother is a Naturalized Citizen
3. His father’s name is “Gershon Baruch Chertoff”

These 3 things will be very relevant later.

But first - let’s address the Mossad connection:

What is El Al Airlines?

An airline established by the eventual first President of Israel, a Zionist - a very rich dude who needed a ride home do he repainted a military plane, flew home, & repainted back for military use. That’s one heck of an expensive uber ride

More 👇🏻

Read 10 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Jan 25

What a great lead in to my next thread.

@BlehmLawAZ has filed his bar complaint answer.

Blehm’s bar complaint is law fare, orchestrated by the IC/CISA/Spaulding.

Anyone that has followed along with my #AzTaskForce information recognizes that IC & CISA with the head “4 star general”, Spaulding, infiltrated our courts & our state bars to kick court cases out/deny evidence be heard/set unprecedented & unsupported standards/limit court time to present evidence/deny justice, tainted by a belief of “Russia is trying to undermine our judicial system”, which and bar complaints are just an extension of that.

We have Elizabeth Rindskopf-Parker (Spaulding’s woman behind the woman) admitting on video that they (Spaulding & herself) were training judges & state bars on “Russian” Disinformation & telling them to come up with a plan…that includes changes to rules & rules of conduct…you know,the ones, for example, that say attorneys can’t criticize judges.

Attorneys have been weaponized to further this agenda.

I don’t know WHO filed against Blehm. But my guess, it’s either Tom Ryan (opposing council on many cases with Blehm) or Ryan Heath (IMO intelligence, trying to infiltrate Lake’s cases - now doing Abe’s). But, just from the way it’s written, I believe it’s Heath.

Either way - they should be put up for review for filing frivolous charges.

Let me explain 👇🏻 (be patient as I put the pieces together & I may get interrupted, but I will get it all up - 👀)

The complaint says Blehm made a knowingly false statement because he said 35k+ ballots were “undisputed”

Pic 1 - Blehm bar complaint response
Pics 2, 3 & 4 from bar complaint

Let’s dive deeper into that, shall we… 👇🏻

Numbers from the county’s own records are not & can not be disputed. It is FACT that

A) the county DID NOT count the ballots before they sent them to Runbeck
B) Runbeck scanned in 35k+ MORE than the estimate. That’s equivalent of roughly 142 1/4 mail trays extra!! (35,563 amount over county estimate / 250 packets per tray)

Little hard to miss something that large!

C. It was shown that Runbeck was putting ballots into the ballot stream. 1) which is illegal & 2) without chain of custody

There is a reason Runbeck won’t turn over their video 😉

I find it hilarious that the courts tried to question the math. All they had to do is add it up & double check the math! No matter how you look at it 1 + 1 still equals 2.

This number is NOT disputed.
In any other time, when there was some sanity, a judge would have said this evidence is enough to render the election “uncertain” - which is the actual standard.

Remember the judge that overturned a local election because they caught election official on video stuffing the ballot box. THAT’s how it should be rendered here.

It is painfully obvious judges do not have the cajones to rule that ALL of the people elected are uncertain- including their own race!

This is further evidence that this judge is compromised (whether by influence from Spaulding or blackmail/pressure from “very powerful people back in east”) and the attorneys who file complaints against the truth are playing right into the hands of those trying to shut down the truth

Read 11 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Dec 30, 2023

Let’s talk more about this presentation & break it down, shall we.

As always, my content is free to swipe, share & make your own.

The importance is to get the information out there.

As a reminder, I don’t number my posts because I always forget 🤣 & be patient with me as I gather all the pieces.

Ready to roll👇🏻

As @realAlexKolodin pointed out 👆🏻. The voter problem & printer issue has been happening since 2018, in increase numbers, in direct correlation with the growth of Fontes’ vote center model.

As partisan as the media & the gas lighters in the county ignore or deny, the number of people concerned increases.

We will not “sit down & shut up@ until we get full answers. Full transparency.

“Trust me” is over. You burnt that bridge Maricopa & BOS.

We are at the “Prove It” stage.

This “independent investigation” was just another attempt to gaslight America.

The report, in itself, was revealing. But I find people’s words & body language say a lot.

Let’s have a deeper look. 👇🏻