Post

@HuttonPulitzer

@JovanHPulitzer

@FannKfann

@brnoforaz

@AZHouseGOP

@JovanHPulitzer

@stephen_richer

@stephen_richer

@stephen_richer

More from @AzPinkLady

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Sep 14

I decided to find the answer to my own question (shared post below) - who was the first to call Trump Hitler. I conducted a “Grok investigation”

The Hitler narrative started with 3 events:

1. Trump’s announcement speech in 2015 where Trump was wrongfully accused of calling all Mexicans rapists & murderers. If they had listened to his speech, they would have had context, that he was talking about illegals being sent to our country & the countries not sending their best people. He included Middle East & Latin America too.

Facts:
a) We know that gang members were coming over the border.

b) We know that drug & human smugglers do rape women & children.

I asked Grok to give me any account that was first to publish that Trump was Hitler or a comparison, and to categorize each account as real, bot, or fake account. The two options I got back were “real” and “probably real” but couldn’t verify because there wasn’t enough data & they stopped posting after 2021. Considering they develop fake accounts to utilize at any time, I spot checked the real vs couldn’t verify. And some looked sketchy. Most of the accounts had very low views & hardly any engagement.

The first X account to make the comparison was a Spanish speaking account, rrazo with 1.9k followers since 2009-still active & still calling Trump Hitler & still making the Putin/Trump connection.

There were 12 identified on the first round of questions. Slightly worded differently there were 59 accounts identified on the 2nd round. I did not double check for duplicates in both sets- just posting here. The majority in both rounds were “couldn’t verify).

No telling how many deleted accounts may have piled on.

Suicide_Skwad was the first. With 245 followers since 2012, Still active, still has TDS. Likely they took this stance because their bio says ex drug dealer - now teaches high school in Mexico.

1 of 7

The next one to compare him to Hitler was a domestic account

Alicia Machado - from Venezuela - a Miss Universe winner that said Trump called her pig & a housewife, which Trump denied.

Blasted out by the Daily Beast (it’s only on Wayback) - written by a White House reporter.

Then a band member for Mana, Fher Olvera, compared Trump to Hitler from the concert stage.

He is very influential in Latin America. Does a rock/mexican music fusion - he’s a rock star that is an environmentalist & social justice activist.

If only there was a pattern 🤔

According to Grok CNN-Mexico was the first news rag that printed the comparison by discussing Fher/ Mana band statements from the concert stage.

2 of 7

The first domestic voice was Kelly McBride on 7/20/15. She co-authored a piece for Poynter Institute, which she is writer & consulting & listed as “one of the leading voices in ethics in journalism” 🤣

Politico picked up the story.

Poynter developed PolitiFact. Although not directly linked to Politico, they reprint/highlight stories between each other & have personnel that have crossed over between each of them.

3 of 7

Read 8 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Sep 10

I have located training of judges on disinformation just prior to 2020 election.

The videos in the following posts show what Spaulding, the ABA, the NCSC, the Brunswick Group & Mary & William Law School worked together to influence judges in “preparation for 2020”

This is a significant find, because it shows Spaulding fed the judges a lie, that she knew to be false because, as she likes to remind everyone, she was in charge of the men & woman protecting elections & did the evaluation of “Russian interference”

Spaulding enlisted the ABA & NCSC to carry this lie forward to all the judges - including those in non- USA jurisdictions.

NCSC worked hand in glove with the ABA to do this. See pic below from October 5, 2020 ABA Journal article titled “How can courts counter disinformation? Arizona task force releases recommendations”

NCSC then works with the Brunswick Group to develop training material/playbooks for the courts.

accesstojustice.nmcourts.gov/wp-content/upl…

This is the 2022 version - they used Spaulding’s Beyond the Ballot report (that I have explained before is using bad data). The earlier version they state was funded by States Justice Institute- fully funded USAID org established by federal law in 1984 to award grants to “improve the quality of justice in state courts, and foster innovative, efficient solutions to common issues faced by all courts.” I couldn’t find the earlier version.

They push training through a joint venture started by NCSC & William & Mary Law School in 2005, the Election Law Program.

NCSC is quoted in a now deleted 2020 NCSC newsroom release: about the trainings:

“With the presidential election fast approaching, the program is hosting a series of webinars with the theme “What Happens (In Our Courts) When America Votes?” This election season, as everyone who follows the news knows, has been extremely litigious, and the Election Law Program is doing everything we can to provide the best information to judges and other court professionals,” said Amy McDowell, NCSC’s director of executive leadership education and its liaison to the Election Law Program. “The webinars are just another way we can fulfill our mission to help the courts as they work to rule on election law cases.”

“To date, over 240 election law cases have been filed in state and federal courts,” said NCSC President Mary McQueen. “The Election Law Program is designed to provide nonpartisan information to judges and other court professionals about various questions that might arise in election law cases. During 2020, NCSC has hosted a series of webinars on ways state courts can navigate the challenges of COVID-19. The election law webinars are similarly designed to prepare the state courts to manage election law cases.”

web.archive.org/web/2020121905…

They go far beyond teaching them election law.

They predispose judges to classify election challenges & information coming to their court as “Russian interference”

I argue, what the heck are they doing training judges since 2005?! What else have they pushed? DEI? Race?

They provide a 4 part webinar series for the lead up to 2020.

This post focuses on the training with Suzanne Spaulding.

The 4 presenters:
- Spaulding - covers Russia disinformation
- Siobhan Gorman -from Brunswick Group - partner with NCSC, gives the judges the “playbook” (rapid response team etc)
- Kemba Walden - Senior Counsel for Cyber and Democracy, Microsoft Innovation and Policy Center - she worked for Krebs at CISA - her take on the technology is cringe - pic below is her chubby crayon understanding
-Avery Davis-Roberts, Associate Director for the Democratic Election Standards Project, The Carter Center - observer did & don’ts/cans & cannots

Key takeaways: Russia disinformation is coming for the court, prepare now, figure out how to respond now (not much time), & observers are a vulnerability. The technology? She says don’t worry. We have CISA providing cybersecurity 🤦🏻‍♀️

Videos next

1 of 8

This first video is the intro & the “wrap up” after the speakers are done with their spiel.

In the title of their webinar: “safeguards” for the judiciary… meaning everything we are about to tell you is a threat.

Listen to what they say…

We provide resources for judges who are called upon to resolve election disputes

Panel of EXPERTS (listen/trust me) to address unique “challenges” facing our democratic system of elections - everything we are telling you is a threat to elections

Faced with pandemic, polarization, heightened security risks & foreign interference & disinformation , putting tremendous “pressure” on our systems of elections - everyone questioning elections are creating a problem

Broad potential attacks on our elections systems…down to the polls - this is after the Carter center chick just described the dos & don’ts of observers.

They are setting the stage.

2 of 8

Spaulding, the star of the show, that everyone keeps referring back to for comment when answering a question & that she adds her comments to every question answered.

First thing Spaulding does is reinforce that the judges are upholding democracy reinforcing Russia is trying to undermine trust in their work.

She never directly says Russia hacked & leaked the emails. She also never actually says the registration interference was Russian. What she does is mention Russia-emails-Russia-registrations-Russia. She surrounds the statements to make the listener believe Russia is to blame for it all.

She also says “now we understand…” that they could manipulate the data in the registration. That’s an out right lie. I have shown you where she said she had studied elections backing 2011 & knew registration databases were the weak link & could be manipulated.

She says approaching Election Day, Russia tactics have evolved to “amplification of domestic voices” with the false & misleading information. They are now creating fake local news sources (aka citizen journalists?)

And Russia’s the only one engaged in the widespread activity to undermine democracy not only around elections but in the courts.

She actually repeated the lie that Russia preferred Trump.

3 of 8

Read 8 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Jul 19

Fox dropped an Exclusive:

“The Obama administration "manufactured and politicized intelligence" to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite information from the intelligence community stating otherwise”

I know we are all saying “duh”.

But there are details we didn’t get before.

Such as, this is the first time, that I know of, the Trump admin has used the word “treason”

“The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government," Gabbard told Fox News Digital”

The article lays out a sequence of events that is important.

12/7/2016 Clapper said "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome."
And Fox lays the coup for MSM consumers.

12/8/2016 the presidential daily brief for Obama which was prepared by DHS, with reporting from the CIA, DIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, State Department and open sources, for Obama stated:

1. "We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure,"

2. "Russian Government-affiliated actors most likely compromised an Illinois voter registration database and unsuccessfully attempted the same in other states."

3. "Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication necessary to change election outcomes,"

4. DNI assessed that any Russian activities "probably were intended to cause psychological effects, such as undermining the credibility of the election process and candidates." & cyber criminals "tried to steal data and to interrupt election processes by targeting election infrastructure, but these actions did not achieve a notable disruptive effect."

But!

The FBI had prepared a draft “dissent” & DNI said hold up - do not publish the brief, scheduled for the 9th, until the FBI shares their “concerns”

Question - when was the draft prepared? Has the meta data been reviewed? Was this a post planted paper trail?

12/9/2016 big situation room meeting with top officials in the National Security Council, Clapper, Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, among others.

Question: I want to know who “the others” are. Was Spaulding there?

Meeting notes say they “agreed to recommend sanctioning of certain members of the Russian military intelligence and foreign intelligence chains of command responsible for cyber operations as a response to cyber activity that attempted to influence or interfere with U.S. elections. if such activity meets the requirements"

Then, Clapper’s assistance emails all the IC leaders & told them to create a new ICA "per the president’s request," that detailed the "tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” & tells them “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS,"

Then, Obama officials "leaked false statements to media outlets" claiming that "Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election."

The 1/6/17 the ICA was released that totally contradicted their previous assessment& was meant to deceive America:

They “suppressed intelligence from before and after the election showing Russia lacked intent and capability to hack the 2016 election."

1 of

Let’s go back to Spaulding’s Stanford speech on 3/23/2018. This speech is her undoing & adds some understanding to the recent disclosures.

The Freudian slip I’ve mentioned a dozen times in x posts & in the report- She stated she starting on 1/20/2016 looking at “adversary threats to fundamental Democratic institutions writ large”

“and now doing a deep dive on adversary threats to public confidence in the American judicial system”

“First thing I did was reach out to the courts…”

“We are educating judges, court personnel, educating the media, educating the press, educating congress, educating the bar, the lawyers about the nature of the threat that we face...”

This is after Obama, Brennan & Comey got @PatrickByrne to shmooze @Maria_Butina in 2015, preparing for the Russia scandal to land on a Republican- Trump just happened to be the lucky one.

x.com/azpinklady/sta…

And got Byrne to bribe Hillary in Thanksgiving 2015.

Spaulding says she then starts looking into threats to fundemental democratic institutions in her Freudian slip. 🤔

Then by 2/2016 Byrne’s handlers tell him to forget it all. Hillary will be the next President.

x.com/azpinklady/sta…

From there, of course, we know the rest:

Spring 2016 Spaulding see registrations being hacked.

x.com/azpinklady/sta…

6/2016 through 12/2016 Steele Dossier is “written”

August, September, October 2016 Spaulding & crew finally tell counties their registrations are being hacked & convince them to sign on for cyber help by CISA.

x.com/azpinklady/sta…

10/2016 Carter Page FISA issued to spy on Trump

Election happens

The Rig from Venezuela /Serbia is stopped & screwed up Obama/Brennan/Comey plan - per @PatrickByrne

x.com/azpinklady/sta…

This evidence is yet to be seen. But Hillary wasn’t mad for nothing. They all knew. That’s what makes the 1/2017 assessment so egregious.

12/8/2016 Operation RussiaHoax goes into warp speed.

1/6/2017 Manipulated ICA report is released.

1/6/2017 Jeh Johnson unilaterally declare elections critical infrastructure

1/7/2017 Jeh Johnson blames Russia for database registration hack. Which they found SQL code left behind. Important fact.

And 1/10/2017 Steele Dossier “leaked”

Obama meets with SJ Terp & Media to start information control. There is no reason to believe Spaulding has not gotten the same messaging/orders considering her extensive involvement.

Add in the SolarWinds hack & you have one heck of a planned operation that covered everything.

It’s Evil Genius.

2 of 5

In addition to knowing the election rig was stopped, they knew the IRA had no impact on 2016 & Butina had no influence, but they took action against innocent people to further their agenda.

Spaulding brought up the IRA in her speech & the conviction of this group.

“Facebook testimony in front of the Hill, particularly in their answers to the questions for the record, 126 million people saw three posts that were from 470 Russian accounts and pages that are affiliated with the Russian internet research agency, which of course is what was Mueller's indictment laid bare.”

I found a study by Gareth Porter @GarethPorte, an AMERICAN award winning investigative journalist specializing in US national security issues. He stated it as overstated the impact this group had. See the shared post below on this post 👇🏻

The speech really is an outline of the entire operation - explaining registration databases are vulnerable, Judiciary leaks are a real concern, give them technology & tools to combat disinfo & influence judges.

Did she drop a hint that judges could be blackmailed with hacking their computer & finding porn or embarrassing personal emails? Listen to the clip.

Between 2017 & 2019 hacks into the judiciary increased 200%

x.com/azpinklady/sta…

Is she that clandestine? Or perhaps it was part of the whole operation.

3 of 5

Read 6 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Oct 26, 2024

I was reading through the latest ruling for the Mississippi lawsuit (ballots accepted after Election Day).

documentcloud.org/documents/2525…

This really is a great read on the history of mail in ballots & makes a fabulous argument for why ballots are not legal to be accepted after Election Day.

The bottom line is they reversed the lower court’s decision & are sending it back down to the district court to come up with a remedy. And telling the lower court to consider “the value of preserving the status quo in a voting case on the eve of an election." We are now required to demonstrate “
"(1) that it has suffered an irreparable injury; (2) that remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for that injury; (3) that, considering the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in equity is warranted; and (4) that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction."

So it remains to be seen what will end up happening.

But… I noticed something even more fascinating…

They also make a great argument for Election “DAY”. Even though they cover changes that have been made over the years to extend “making a selection”.

And I think they just gave a legal reasoning on rerunning our elections when the boiling point of @PatrickByrne findings reach a level that the entire country understands we are using Venezuela Smartmatic infused voting machines that are coded in Serbia, With China parts assembled in Taiwan.

As a side note: The 5 yo little boy in me finds it hilarious to draw the comparison when the judge refers to consummated elections. Because we all have felt “F*cked” by our elections. 🤣

I digress.

Next posts have my supporting reasoning.

1 of 5

The judge refers to two statutes that

1) "The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors" for President. In 1792 Congress had set a 34 day period "preceding the first Wednesday in December in every fourth year." Some states adopted multi day voting. But it “caused election fraud, delay, and other problems.”

🤔 kinda sounds like what we have with a month of early voting, mail in ballots & weeks to get to results.

2) The state determines the time, manner & place of elections for Federal races BUT “the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations." “It also vests "power" in Congress to "alter those [state] regulations or supplant them altogether."”

Supplant = supersede or replace

In the early days of our Republic (not a democracy) states held elections at different times. Giving “"undue advantage" of "indicating to the country the first sentiment on great political questions."”

🤔 Kinda sounds like early voting. Did we just prove by voting early that it can sway sentiment, polls & cause the candidates to alter their course?

The judge summarizes that these statutes “"mandate[] holding all elections for Congress and the Presidency on a single day throughout the Union."” And subsequently refers to “Election Day” as a “ singular day established by federal law as the time for choosing members of Congress and presidential electors.”

2 of 5

The judge goes on to explain his ruling under the auspices of those statutes.

The judge clarifies that the State can make decisions on how to run Federal Elections unless Congress disagrees…

“States can regulate many elements of federal elections, "but only so far as Congress declines to preempt state legislative choices."”

Congress can “override state regulations by establishing uniform rules for federal elections, binding on the States.”

🤔 aren’t states currently running their elections with different rules?

And the judge covers that the Feds are not usurping state power. The original intent of the law was always to allow Congress to step in if need be & for a narrow topic:

“…the Elections Clause affects only an area in which the states have no inherent or reserved power: the regulation of federal elections…”

The judge goes into detail about explaining the definition of “election” which contains three elements: “(1) official action,
(2) finality, and (3) consummation.”

In discussing point 1, he points out that:

“The Supreme Court has said "the word [election] now has the same general significance as it did when the Constitution came into existence — final choice of an officer by the duly qualified electors."”

👁️ Not Citizens. We elect our electors through the parties. And the PCs vote for the National Delegates. These delegates all meet with the other state’s national delegates & cast votes. Until someone gets 50% + 1 of the electoral votes (Each state has so many according to their population- another topic for another day).

In Az, these Delegates are duty bound to vote for the popular vote (will of the people) on the first round. But, some states are not. Theoretically, political game play can happen. Those not bound can vote different than their popular vote, siting convictions, Hitler, yadda, yadda, on the first round & screw up the first round of voting freeing the delegates that are duty bound to vote someone else.

Theoretically, Trump could loose the presidency through this game play.

That’s why “Trump bound every round” was who we voted in for Arizona. It’s also why the traitor LaCivita targeted Shelby & other states with lies.

This is a really good time to plug becoming a PC!

I digress…

My guess the judge did not address the National Electors actually voting in the Prez because it wasn’t germane to the question at hand.

The court goes on to pointout (pic 4) that voters make “selections” & an election is when those selections are considered as a whole.

“So the election concludes when the final ballots are received and the electorate, not the individual selector, has chosen.”

🤔 Can elections be concluded if all the selections are not received…say from interruption?

3 of 5

Read 5 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Jun 14, 2024

Another Spaulding source of reference has crumbled. Add that to the list of Hamilton 68, NewKnowledge & First Draft. Check out @mtaibbi #CTILFiles & #TwitterFiles for more - I believe @pepesgrandma has researched them further. These folks are THE treasurer trove of research the makes the whole house of Russia disinformation cards crumble.

You can easily search their posts for hashtags or key words listed above. Remember to check out how CTIL made an CIA trained army to “combat” Russia disinformation with tactics used to interfere in foreign countries.

Obviously Spaulding doesn’t follow them. 🤣

All Spaulding’s sources to scare judges are bullshit. And even though the Az Disinformation Task Force couldn’t find any disinformation (screenshot for Task Force 7/2020 meeting minutes) that was ok. They greatly used Spaulding’s work products & wording for the report. I will guide you through that claim as we go along.

And yet…Spaulding is still pushing the bullshit lie that the judiciary is under attack.

“Courts and the election are on a collision course”. Which election, Spaulding? Will 2020 finally get it’s day in court?

And she’s still pushing her bullshit on state bars across the united states.

The show must go on, right Spaulding?

The best thing any bar, judge or attorney can do is loose her number.

And legislators would do their stares justice by removing the power for the Bar to discipline judge’s & attorneys. They deserve their day in court just as any citizen. It is imperative we keep the judicial system neutral from influence. The Bar’s ability to intimidate judges & attorneys that will have any effect on the decisions they make.

@JohnKavanagh_AZ @anthonykernAZ @Wadsack4Arizona @WendyRogersAZ
@Leo4AzHouse
@SelinaBliss
@realAlexKolodin
@DaveMarshallAZ
@QuangNguyenAZ
@JWilloughbyAZ you may want to pay attention to this thread

Come along with me….

Listen to Suzanne Spaulding describe why the commission she was on was called “Solarium”. She is speaking to a panel about the Cybersecurity Solarium Commission- to talk about the report she was a “leading voice” on, that provide steps forward to combat “Russia disinformation” which included pre-written legislation, ready tor the floor, which resulted in CISA getting more power & more money.

Indulge me as I take you on a journey from the Az Disinformation Task Force to Dwight Eisenhower & his Russia “Project Solarium” to develop an “effective strategy to respond to Soviet Expansion” & come along for a thought stream afterwards, then re-listen come back to this first post & re-listen to her describe Eisenhower’s “Project Solarium” through the lenses I will clean for you.

👇🏻

I couldn’t put the nice little video provided to me, in the above post, that the source was lucky enough to capture Spaulding in the only meeting she attended. Which happened to be 8/2020, just before the final report for the study phase of the task force was produced. This is a significant capture of information because the meeting minutes do not provide the context & depth of understanding as these raw videos.

I thought about editing them to make the videos more palatable, but thought it best to leave raw. However, I did edit to maintain the anonymity of the source.

Here is a video of Patience Huntwork identifying “hate speech” & an opinion that jury duty is a waste of time as items for “disinformation” & Spaulding’s response is that they use that as an indicator that the message is out there & needs combating.

Do you remember from the task force thread who Patience Huntwork is? Long time anti- Russian activist that helps Ukraine in their elections (no way CIA doesn’t know about this 😉)

And if you remember, Elizabeth Rindskopf-Parker, Spaulding’s right hand man in this “mission set” as Spaulding describes it, helped Brutinel select the academia to put on the task force. Listen to Brutinel explain how the task force came to be, within it, he reveals parker helped him…

Remember, Spaulding is an ex-CIA & Senate Select Intelligence Committee council who founded CISA & left CISA to go to CSIS - huge policy driver of our country - specifically to combat Russia going after our courts. “mission set”…odd way to put it, don’t you think?

You can read more about her on my task force thread.

Source tor “mission set”

And how influential was the anti-Russian, pro Ukrainian, anti-judge hate speech hunter on the report? Significant. Hear Spaulfing describe it as so much she thought “Huntwork is working on this” noted in the drafts was a company.

BTW…why is Spaulding getting drafts of the reports? 🤔 Monitor it’s progress? Perhaps she came to the 8/2020 meeting to get them on track & provide them with documents & wording to beef up their report & get the product she can use to take to other courts. 🤔

Keep following along - that thought won’t seem so far off when I’m done.

This is going to be a long thread. I will add to it often.

Bookmark & check back.

More 👇🏻

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1694416403355566172?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1694125000503255331?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1730602715825451408?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

To really understand what happened with the Task Force, we must understand what disinformation Spaulding was using to convince judges that Russia was undermining democracy by going after our courts.

First, she sites a case in Germany called the “Lisa case” or “Lisa F” case.

When I originally captured a Wikipedia page of this story, it was completely sourced. It had all sides of the story & clearly pointed to conflicting information. In particular, the parents’ assertion that she had been abused & showed physical signs of it. In addition, she was interrogated for 3 hours without her parents, & reported to them she was coerced into changing het story.

Since then, Wikipedia has removed that version, even from wayback & replaced it with one that aligns with Spaulding’s take.

I know 🤦🏻‍♀️. My mistake for 1) using Wikipedia, and 2) not capturing it on video & saving all the sources. I learned my lesson Spaulding…don’t expect that to happen again.

As you know, I have been quiet. I’m busy in the background. And I have learned that I will not publish any part of what I know, what I’m looking at, what resources I’m saving because, for example, my teaser on CISA & their “next moves” resulted in them removing that podcast. Guess what goons, I have it captured. 🤣

As you can see, my old link got redirected to their new version.

Old link is on this post

You can read tor yourself how they changed the story from my screenshots to now. It’s what “they” do - rewrite history

The bottom line to this story, since I can no longer find the links to the parents interview, is that RT sued an outfit in Germany for lying about RT & falsely accusing them of starting the protest.

I know it seems ironic to post a source from RT when Spaulding is saying they are spewing lies.

Here’s the thing, RT “American Lawyer” show she claims is really beating is our courts is an AMERICAN. I checked out his stories. He was giving the other side of the story that America wouldn’t produce. He was posting about the information we now know to be true about covid & the vaccine, he rightfully questioned the courts, various criminal cases, etc. Spaulding uses a pucture of herself on his show as confirmation he spreads disinformation… as if to say “see, I’m a great person & he’s talking about me”. 🤣

What about Twin Falls?

More 👇🏻

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1744238654405644469?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

rt.com/news/532396-rt…

https://x.com/azpinklady/status/1780937097471516882?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA

Read 49 tweets

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@AzPinkLady

Mar 22, 2024

The info bring exposed is so explosive the bad guys are in over drive.

They are D-O-N-E

This is a really good lead in to the information I was working on to share with you.

@PatrickByrne did a locals on 3/21 - I put todays date on the video clips 🤪

Although I believe this info is not behind a subscription paywall, he is well worth $5 a month. This money goes directly to funding this fight. He revealed a lot of information - but I want to address this topic in particular & give you pieces of video to share. Ask the BOS, Richer, Hobbs & fraud denying legislators why they”appealed to a higher authority” & didn’t investigate legitimate concerns.

Ask them why they obstructed. Were they part of it?

There was SOMEONE on the ground that made the boxes “match” the audit. 🤔

Follow along & you’ll understand why I say that.

👇🏻

Byrne has let us know SCOTUS has a nice package that proves A) the Dominion system is 💩. So bad it is “had to be” designed that way. B) that the elections were fraudulent & C) data was manipulated- untraceable.

This gives Richer & the rest of them plausible deniability. I’m not saying they were involved. But someone made the data & the paper match.

What it does not do is excuse them from upholding their oath. They have a DUTY to investigate. Not just take CISA/CIA/FBI word for it. They had a DUTY to open up their systems & go through them with a fine tooth comb. They had a DUTY not to obstruct.

This little video is a lead in to the rest of the thread I’ll do. I may get interrupted.

There is more 👇🏻

Three things Byrne discussed:
1). The Rijndael key left in plain text in the database.

2) system behavioral files that can be tweaked to favor one candidate over another

3) software that was changed from the certified version. (Maricopa secret “L&A”? 19” ballot definitions?)

More 👇🏻