A good summary of the bill that @repblumenauer and I introduced today to overhaul our National Flood Insurance Program, to help homeowners rebuild more quickly and keep the program solvent in the wake of ever-increasing floods. thehill.com/policy/equilib…
A major driver behind this bill was a comment made to me at the beginning of my 1st term: "Insurance is for things that are expensive, rare and unpredictable. Thanks to global warming, flooding is only expensive."
From flooded properties along the Fox River, Mayors and Managers struggling to manage costs in low-lying parts of #IL06 and all the funding requests our office has received / helped fund for storm sewer upgrades, it's become ever clearer that flooding is NOT just a coastal issue.
Moreover, the structure we currently use to approve claims for flooded properties often means that homeowners may have to wait YEARS to make urgent repairs, and then still have to pay 10% of the cost out of pocket.
So as it sits right now, we have an NFIP that is ever more insolvent, and home-owners facing horrible choices to pay out of pocket in the hope of a future claim or else risk the loss of all their equity. This bill fixes all of those problems by:
1) Eliminating the requirement for a 10% copay, and 2) For repetitive loss properties, calculating the future costs of claims and offering a "buyout-in-lieu-of-claims" if cheaper
That latter piece means that if it's cheaper to relocate you to higher ground, we will use the NFIP to do so, and then permanently take that parcel of land out of development, letting it become a natural flood barrier (aka, "sponge") to reduce the risk to surrounding properties.
The current NFIP funding expires in September 2022, so we've got a short window to get this done, but I'm optimistic we have a path. Stay tuned. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@SenatorCollins is being intentionally disingenuous here about the Womens Health Protection Act, and obviously using the @GOP talking points that are designed to confuse rights, obligations and religion. Let's discuss: washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
1/ First, let's clarify rights vs obligations. Neither Roe, nor the WHPA would obligate anyone to obtain, nor provide an abortion. It simply guarantees the RIGHT to both.
2/ And to be clear, that is a federal right, granted to all American women and medical providers. Don't believe anyone who tells you that the draft SCOTUS rule simply shifts that question to the states. It takes away your rights and grants them to state legislatures.
So Roberts is concerned "people's perception" of SCOTUS might be at risk. I agree. The consent of the governed must be jealously protected, lest it be too-easily lost . But... cnn.com/2022/05/05/pol…
1/ Is he concerned about the texts between a sitting justice's wife and those who planned and attacked our nation's Capitol? cnn.com/2022/03/24/pol…
2/ Is he concerned that two sitting justices were credibly accused of sexual assault and are now suggesting that they would vote to strip women of their constitutional rights? politico.com/news/2022/05/0…
Good morning. I'm done being angry and it's time to get to work. Here's what we've got to do. Thread:
1/ First, let's acknowledge what we've done. We feared this was coming in the House and moved preemptively to pass @RepJudyChu's Women's Health Protection Act which would codify Roe's protections in law and block SCOTUS from killing women. congress.gov/bill/117th-con…
So here's a happy little story about great teachers, enthusiastic students, the power of democracy. Short thread:
1/ A little over a year ago, some students at Pleasantdale Middle School in Burr Ridge realized that we have a problem in Illinois. We do not have a state rock.
2/ So, their teacher got them to do some research, put a poll together and then - this being the age of social media - tagged a bunch of us politicos to drum up attention.
This is the ethical test that has been weighing on our country since 2016. We all knew what was broken in that election. Masses of Americans chose to fix it. They marched, they canvassed, they ran for office, they voted. The @GOP debated whether 'twas better to break or ignore.
Even after January 6, that was still true. McConnell didn't try to fix it. He just thanked his lucky stars that other people would fix what he couldn't: "The Democrats are going to take care of the son of a bitch for us", he said privately.
Some thoughts on energy supply, energy demand and how much we vastly understate our ability to grow our economy by REDUCING energy demand. Thread:
1/ This has been bugging me over the last few months as the situation in Ukraine has made supply side (aka: drill-baby-drill) voices ascendant and the voices calling for conservation have lost their self-confidence and mojo
2/ A big part of this relates to the background of folks who talk energy and enviro policy in DC. People who come from the energy sector too often assume that there is a direct link between energy demand, energy supply and economic growth.