The idea that we need to seek our partner's permission to do things that are within our own domain is rooted in the belief that possession equals love. #openrelating#autonomy#agency
How do you define your autonomy and agency within your relationship?
What do you include in your domain?
What are things that you know you have a right to? That you are solely responsible for?
Do you need permission to see friends? go to the gym? buy yourself an outfit?
It is no different with dating other people.
It only feels different because of shame and guilt that we were indoctrinated with.
This does not mean we can do what we like in a committed relationship without consequence.
It means the starting point is knowing we have autonomy and agency, and working out how to get what we need and want within a framework that also meets our partner's needs and wants.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In monogamy, there is a clear hierarchy of the dyad relationship. 2 people agree to prioritise eachother in certain aspects of their lived, eg. Romance, sex, time, living arrangements, holidays, having children together, finances etc.
When it comes to Multigamy (non-monogamy), ie. The conscious and consensual practice of non exclusive relationships, hierarchy starts to look very different.
Initially, couples who open their relationship rely on the familiar and safe, so they create agreements that sustain some exclusivity and ensure they feel prioritised over all others.
What is expected of me in relation to other people my partner is dating?
A thread.
My partner has a new person they are dating. They want to meet me, or my partner wants us to meet.
Do I have any obligation to my partner in this? Or to their partner?
No, I don't have to meet if there is no direct benefit to me and if it causes me discomfort or anxiety.
It helps if I know we have common interests beyond liking the same person. Curiosity is OK.
If it helps my partner or metamour feel better, I may agree to meet when it's convenient to me.