It’s been clear for some time that WTO members are unlikely to agree on anything substantial on agriculture—despite declaring it a priority—when their ministers meet in Geneva Jun 12–15
Information from trade sources on a meeting last Thu May 19 reinforce that assessment🧵
1/11
The focus has changed in recent months—the Ukraine war has increased concerns about food security.
But the best binding decision that can be expected is to exempt the World Food Programme’s humanitarian purchases from export restrictions—still opposed by India & Tanzania.
2/11
Expect some non-binding/“best-endeavour” statement on food security, eg, the UK-led proposal⬇️, which draws on familiar themes of keeping supplies flowing, increasing transparency, minimising market disruption.
…Some developing countries say notifying export restrictions is already a burden.
India has not (yet) notified its recent export restriction on wheat. In last week’s meeting it defended the ban and complained about “naming and shaming”.
This is what the talks’ chair Gloria Abraham Peralta (Costa Rica’s ambassador) has proposed on exempting the World Food Programme, and more generally on export restrictions.
The main purpose of the WTO agriculture talks is to continue reforming internationally-agreed rules for govts’ farm trade policy—export subsidies (now banned but work continues on hidden subsidies), domestic support, market access.
In last week’s informal agriculture negotiations meeting, Argentina, Mexico, NZ and Paraguay (all active participants in the talks) complained about not being invited to the “Green Room” meetings, sources say.
Green Room = director-general’s meeting room. Holds about 20.
8/11
Overall, the aims written into the work programmes may be toned down in order to secure agreement at the Ministerial Conference, sources say. (Essentially that kicks detailed aims down the road)
The G33 (original proponents) and African Group said they are modifying the proposal for a permanent solution. They have only days to produce a new text and persuade the rest of the membership to accept it at the Ministerial Conference.
Chair @WillsSantiago briefed the media after a stock-taking meeting of the membership.
Sandwiched between plenaries Mon and Fri, were sessions in various formats. Wills said 30-40 delegations were involved in each of those sessions, total about 50.
WTO members on all sides were urged today to sort out their reservations over the proposed compromise, so that a deal on waiving some intellectual property protection for COVID-19 can be struck by the Jun 12-15 Ministerial Conference, trade sources say.
In an informal meeting of the WTO intellectual property (TRIPS) council, Director-General @NOIweala said WTO members have no option but to produce a result for the #MC12 Ministerial Conference, even if that means negotiating round the clock, the sources said.
2/14
Today's meeting was held to take stock of the first two days of real negotiations on the compromise text⬇️, on Mon&Wed, May 16&18. During those sessions, @NOIweala urged delegates to be prepared to compromise: "the perfect is the enemy of the good"
TRIPS Council chair Amb. Lansana Gberie (Sierra Leone) said: "It is the only product that we have. It’s the only game in town.” No one disagreed according to Rockwell.
So for the first time members will negotiate a text, and it will be this one.
WTO members still have a range of reservations about the text—on adding diagnostics and therapeutics, concerns that existing flexibilities in WTO rules should not be compromised, and more🧵⬇️
Most said their capitals were still considering the text.
WTO members were largely non-committal today in their first reaction to the proposed compromise text on intellectual property and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Most said they needed more time to study it, although some indicated some concerns
None of the “Quad”—EU, India, South Africa, US—wholeheartedly endorsed it even though the text emerged from consultations among them, with the help of WTO director-general @NOIweala and her deputy @_AnabelG
Their common line was they hoped it could lead to agreement.
2/12
India & SAfrica authored the original proposal⬇️. WTO members were deadlocked over it.
Today, SAfrica said the compromise could finally allow members to negotiate a text, and focus on finding a solution for the Jun 12-15 Ministerial Conference.
This is about transparency in what governments do under the WTO trade agreements.
It’s a major role of the WTO, achieved by members notifying each other (and the world at large) through the WTO. That allows understanding, scrutiny and feedback.