Post

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
Click again on or Share Via icon
Click on Copy Link to Tweet
Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
More info at Twitter Help

Bar and Bench

May 23, 2022 • 13 tweets • 6 min read • Read on X

District and Sessions Judge of #Varanasi, Dr AK Vishvesha will shortly begin hearing the civil suit by Hindu parties seeking worshipping rights inside #Gyanvapimosque. The court will decide the application for maintainability of suit filed by Muslim side first

The corridors leading to the courtroom of District Judge Vishvesha abuzz with Gyanvapi case conversations #GyanvapiMosque #Varanasi

The #GyanvapiMosqueCase will be heard post 2 pm. Parties seen thronging the courtroom. Media access is barred so far

Police bandobast has been tightened outside the courtroom of District Judge AK Vishvesha. #GyanvapiMosqueCase

So far only 16 people have been allowed inside the courtroom. The District judge was to start proceedings at 11 am. Due to a delay, the hearing will now begin at 2 pm #GyanvapiMosque

As per the lawyers of the Hindu party, there is no objection to the court deciding Order 7 Rule 11 application first. However the party is expected to request court for a copy of the Commissioner's survey report of #Gyanvapimosque

For local lawyers, it's a day of media frenzy. One of the lawyers who works under the humble shade of a rusted Tin roof says, "aaj toh sab Gyanvapi hai" (Today everything is about Gyanvapi) #GyanvapiMosqueCase #KashiVishwanathTemple

Senior Advocate Maan Bahadur Singh has been engaged to represent the Hindu party today assisted by Advocate Hari Shankar Jain and Vishnu Shankar Jain

The Muslim side will be represented by Adv Raees Ahmed and C Abhay Yadav #Gyanvapi

Arguments have commenced
The Court commisioner Vishal Singh along with his other team members have been asked to report to the court of Varanasi District Judge #Gyanvapi

Arguments conclude #Gyanvapi

The hearing was to decipher the way ahead and how would the hearing in this case be conducted

[Breaking]: Varanasi court to deliver order tomorrow on whether to invite objections on commissioner survey report of #Gyanvapi mosque or conduct hearing on Order 7 Rule 11 application first. Hindus wanted the objections to be heard while Muslims wanted the O7R11 to be decided

Hearing ends
The clip shows media attention around #GyanvapiMosque case

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @barandbench

Bar and Bench

@barandbench

Jul 16

#SupremeCourt hears plea by BRS President and former Chief Minister K Chandrashekar Rao challenging the Telangana High Court's decision to dismiss his petition against a commission formed by the state government

Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Plain case of political vendetta. Every time the government changes there is a case against the former chief minister

CJI DY Chandrachud: we will clarify that by calling it judicial enquiry they cannot take it outside the scope of the commission @TSwithKCR

Rohatgi: you cannot fix responsibility in a fact finding commission. This was for approval of tariff ..there was a power crisis and thus state bought power from state of chhatisgarh and thus the PPA needed approval from Chhattisgarh state commission and Telangana state commission.

Read 16 tweets

Bar and Bench

@barandbench

Jul 15

#BREAKING

Supreme Court DISMISSES plea by Deputy CM of Karantaka DK Shivakumar to quash CBI's disproportionate assets case against him under provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

A bench of Justices Bela Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma heard the matter.

Trivedi J: How High Can stay the sanction order granted by government? This is unheard of.

Senior Adv Rohatagi (for Shivakumar): That is withdrawn already.

Trivedi J to State: That is different thing but how High Court can grant such order?

Senior Adv Rohatagi (for Shivakumar): We are on a new question, the ground is this court has held that if the predicate offence is only conspiracy, it cannot be a stand alone offence and it has to be added by some other offence as well. I am questioning the FIR lodged by CBI which is completely illegal. I am not on any part by ED. I am on the FIR dated 3.10.20 under PC Act by CBI. Section 17A which has come in 2018 requirement has not been fulfilled (referring to split verdict of Justice Trivedi and Justice Bopanna)

Trivedi J: We cannot quash the case on the basis of split verdict by this court.

Senior Adv Rohatagi: But one judge has ruled in our favor.

Trivedi J: So what, that cannot be the basis of quashing. No quashing at all.

Read 4 tweets

Bar and Bench

@barandbench

Jun 26

[Excise policy case]

CBI to produce Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal before Rouse Avenue Court and seek his custody.

Hearing likely to start at 10AM.

#ArvindKejriwal @CBIHeadquarters @AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal

Kejriwal to be produced before Special Judge (PC Act) Amitabh Rawat shortly.

Arvind Kejriwal's wife Sunita Kejriwal reaches court.

Read 118 tweets

Bar and Bench

@barandbench

Jun 25

Delhi High Court to shortly pronounce its verdict on ED's plea seeking stay on bail granted to Arvind Kejriwal.

Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain will pronounce order at 2:30 PM.

#DelhiHighCourt #ArvindKejriwal @dir_ed @AamAadmiParty @ArvindKejriwal #Bail

Kejriwal was granted bail by the trial court on Thursday (June 20). The High Court put an interim stay on his bail the next day, after ED challenged the order.

On the same day, Justice Jain reserved his verdict on ED's stay application.

Read detailed story here:
barandbench.com/news/delhi-hig…

ED and AAP lawyers present in court.

Read 13 tweets

Bar and Bench

@barandbench

Jun 15

#Breaking

Delhi High Court orders removal of tweets by Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Jairam Ramesh, and Pawan Khera alleging that journalist Rajat Sharma abused Nayak on live-television.

@RajatSharmaLive @NayakRagini @Jairam_Ramesh @Pawankhera

High Court holds that Congress leaders over-sensationalised the incident and did not remain truthful.

"It cannot be denied that the citizens have a right to freedom of Speech and expression but there was also a corresponding duty to remain truthful to the incident. The X posts berating the plaintiff are nothing but an oversensationalization and depiction of facts which are patently false," the court said.

Read 6 tweets

Bar and Bench

@barandbench

Jun 13

Supreme Court to hear batch of pleas seeking cancellation of NEET 2024

#SupremeCourt #NEET #NEET_परीक्षा #NeetUG24Controversy #neetexam2024 #neet #NEET_परीक्षा #NEET_परीक्षा_परिणाम

Matter before a Vacation Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta.

Adv Kanu Aggarwal for respondents : A decision has been taken to allay the fear of students.

#SupremeCourt #NEET #NEET_परीक्षा #NeetUG24Controversy #neetexam2024 #neet #NEET_परीक्षा #NEET_परीक्षा_परिणाम

Read 17 tweets

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Bar and Bench

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @barandbench

Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!