The future of crypto payments should be to further cypherpunk and privacy, it should be fixing the Internet, not the current trajectory and state of affairs.
We need to talk about the future of smart contracts and apps, dapps so forth with Bitcoin and Monero, atomic swaps and
broader newer services with historic coins.
TLDR; Bitcoin is totally hijacked by anti-cypherpunk people, people who cosplay liberty, but are in fact arguably deeply in bed with international state power, even more than eth. It's dour, radical institutional capture. #monero
This is not 2017, technology is rapidly changing. The ability to do things with agnostic zk rollups and layer 3 solutions is going to allow a lot of things to be done with lightning channels. The most advanced on the cusp things are by far using lightning and final settlements
via bitcoin, litecoin, (like tradelayer and copper) or zkrollups and other things like tendermint. #cypherpunk
This would allow old coins to be used as a global encryption utility to give finality to say the existence of a social media account, someones speech, someone's writing
political opinions, their art and expression and so forth. Mind you, this is not easy or here yet with bitcoin or litecoin and old coins, (no smart contract on monero obviously), this is the most advanced stuff firmly in the realm of Clairo, Clarity, Rust programming, #zkrollups
and so forth.
Tendermint and zkrollups allow many things offchain where most engineering takes place to achieve fidelity onchain. This helps shift the entire thesis away from purely ethereum smart contracts. This industry needs flexibility in engineering if it's going to fix the
internet.
To do this with old coins is not simple or easy. Historically everything was focused around making a new [redacted] and being robbed by Venture capital. No ecosystem interchangiability, no fungibility, no composability, just endless scams.
That gets us to people like Saylor and Saifedean and their political positions, and US Financial Laws.
How are you going to protect the speech, expression, writing, and social media of 168 countries, and 8 billion people *from their own government* much less our government the
absolute imperialist monetary colonialism financial regulations of US Law.
There is only one way to do that, and it is highly composable client side software that
1)uses a coin to settle and prove finality, to pay for global omniprescent storage. If someone's writing and
2)posts exist on one server or one computer, some nation state will censor or seize it.
3)Is fully anonymous to prevent state persecution
4)Used to prevent duplication, fraud, plagiarism, and impersonation, the finality of identity, similar to a public PGP signature.
While what I mentioned may sound totally sane and intuitive, the fully anonymous part is what G20 states, Fatf, and US Law and EU Law are hyper hostile towards and are fighting tooth and nail. I cannot begin to explain to you how hard they are working
behind the scenes to prevent this, to censor the entire internet, with the EU now proposing a law to do CLIENT SIDE scanning of all posts and speech. Truly an Orwellian totalitarian state.
So this brings me to this point.
If Saylor and Saifedean are aiding and abetting the SEC out of political spite, and cooperating with US Financial Surveillance laws and ultimately promoting and defending EU and US and even other G20 States, if you have ethereum teams complying more and more with regulators
and attending conferences to plan layer 1 permissioned systems. Saifedean is promoting Monarchism out in the open for christ sake, he's an authoritarian. Same with Keiser and Saylor. You have Coinbase promoting the "TRUST" system ( look it up, travel rule compliance).
Many of these other layer 1s have dubious decentralization.
The malarkey with Venture capital on the investment thesis, legal liability, has now been devastating for two cycles, they've dumped down 95% two cycles in 6 years. It attracts feds like flies to cow patties.
*****How are you going to protect the speech and expression of 8 billion people, if these so called thought heros promote KYC compliance on every single company or development team, how can you create an ecosystem culture that defends
the human race from state political persecution if you enable a culture of defending the SEC, CFTC, FSOC, DOJ, DHS, and other US and EU financial regulators?*
It's shocking just how uneducated or outright stupid bitcoin maximalist, particularly the Saifedean ones are. I know austrian economist can be dense, but outright denial of modern finance tools & derivatives is lobotomy level shit. Saifedean & Saylor know better, it's an act.
It's not a neofascist conspiracy, it's not even an austrian conspiracy to have thatcherite policy, it's, this is a literal Intel Op made to make crypto eat itself with tail chasing. This weaponized, simplified memed version of austrian school serves no one.
But I will say that Bitcoin maximalism is not something that started austrianism, austrian economic memes online greatly predate the BTC maxi movement, BTC is being used by these shitbags to further their 1960s banana republic neoliberal Reagan garbage.
Getting into academic level Post Colonialism does more to explain the current battle over Woke, which is bordering Civil War level hate, than anything. I promise you, nothing the left is doing is fundamentally fixing the issues outlined in these texts.
It's certainly characterized, studied in a historical objective manner, namely that colonial history is some wildly hyper evil violent racist shit undeniably, but different flavors of blue stack fascism and increased collective coercion do nothing to address it.
The left isn't just wrong, the democrats and progressives aren't just wrong, they're catastrophically wrong, and have no peaceful long term solutions, they've ventured too far from Enlightenment principles. In a sense, they are anti-liberal. It's own devolution of liberalism.
the left eating it's own, out here trying to cancel noam chomsky. honestly I'm getting to the point where I don't want to be associated with the term anarchist. I think I blame Dsa and Rose for a lot of shit that actually comes from full on anarchism.
The implications of their version of anti-colonialism, and abolition this-that, is in many ways the dreaded term "cultural marxism". IF they can't control you economically, they'll wage psychological warfare on every other front. Coercive, extortive, collective guilt
for cultural and social capital, as a weapon, if they can't have the money, they'll take your social standing. Well boy you haven't seen what money can do, heartless money.
I can't stress this more. anti-libertarians are anti-cypherpunk. They are institutionalizing bitcoin to incorporate into the conservative apparatus of private equity, and the underlying class power of the existing corporatism and political power in the United States.
The Boomecons have adopted bitcoin as a surrogate for gold, to push their usual Reaganite Neocon shit, and thus you can expect extreme cronyism, corruption, regime politics, and more Patriot act Iraq War type shit from these people. Particularly Taiwan.
These wealthy stakeholder conservatives in wallstreet are literally architects of the Cia and ODNI and Iraq and afghanistan. They will sick the surveillance system, and ai, on the basic civil liberty of all people on this planet, including US citizens.
Some Proposals By Saylor & Saifedean are Worrying
We need to talk about the future of smart contracts and apps, dapps so forth with Bitcoin.
This is not 2017, technology is rapidly changing. The ability to do things with agnostic zk rollups and layer 3 solutions is going to
allow a lot of things to be done with lightning channels. The most advanced on the cusp things are by far using lightning and final settlements via bitcoin
This would allow bitcoin to be used as a global encryption utility to give finality to say the existence of a social media
account, someones speech, someone's writing, political opinions, their art and expression and so forth. Mind you, this is not easy or here yet with bitcoin, this is the most advanced stuff firmly in the realm of Clairo, Clarity, Rust programming, Zk Rollups and so forth. To do
It may be possible to do something akin to this with zk rollups using what is essentially a layer 3 EVM based blockchain, or ecosystem of blockchains using tindermint and zkrollups. People looking into gaming on the blockchain, want to do essentially 80% of the app development on
the client side off chain, and use the final zk proofs to prove the applications state as a submission to the chain. This could be done with any app, and I prefer client side apps. But you need chains and on chain proofing for immutability and distributed processing & storage
which adds considerable censorship resistance. You can make the collateral agnostic for these chains using different synthetic tokens. I don't like the idea of constantly inventing a new Venture Capital token to shitcoin people to death all the time either, this marketing