A thread on how the media is telling you two major lies about mass shootings and gun control

1: Other countries with vastly stricter gun laws than the US have higher rates of mass shootings.

2: US jurisdictions w/ gun laws have exponentially higher rates of gun violence

#2A
Although events in the U.S. tend to get the lion's share of media exposure, mass shootings are clearly a worldwide issue.

The US makes up about 1.15% of the world's mass shootings while having almost 5% of the world's population.
Out of 97 countries with data, the US is 64th in frequency of mass shootings and 65th in murder rate.

And rates of mass shootings elsewhere are rising faster
4 times as many per capita died in mass shootings in FRANCE as in the US. 21 times in Norway.

In addition to those fairly nice nations, Finland, Germany, Israel, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland have higher mass shooting death rates.
All of those are pretty nice countries which MUCH stricter gun control laws than the US...and all have higher per capita deaths from mass shootings than the US.
According to this 2018 study (surveying data over an 18 year period), the US is 64th in the world in terms of mass shooting rates per capita (which sounds far worse than it is...because all the countries in gray below didn't report data.)

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
If anything our policy structure is actually pretty good at preventing this by global standards...especially relative to fairly nice countries of the type we want to compare America to.
2: The highest gun-ownership state with the loosest gun laws in the nation is Wyoming, where 59.7% of households have a gun (really!)

Wyoming gun laws are arguably the LEAST restrictive in the United States.

findlaw.com/state/wyoming-…
Wyoming does NOT HAVE a gun homicide problem, with a rate of only 1.4 per 100,000–actually lower than right across the border in more gun-controlled Canada– and only about a third of that of the nation as a whole.
The highest murder rate of any jurisdiction in the US is Washington, DC, which has a murder rate of 21.8 per 100,000... more than twenty times that of most European countries!
But DC also has the most restrictive gun laws in the country... and the lowest rates of legal gun ownership, with numbers less than in many European states!

findlaw.com/state/dc-law/d…

[Gulp]
I'd say that data suggests that the factors making DC have such high gun violence rates are part of the story of why America as a whole is so deadly, but these cannot include high gun ownership or a lack of gun regulation...by definition.
If stricter gun laws reduced gun violence rates, you'd expect jurisdictions with those laws to have lower rates of gun violence.

Instead, we find quite the opposite.
Now, maybe you think "of course those jurisdictions have higher gun violence rates, that's why they enacted the laws."

I doubt that...but the data is CLEAR that those laws haven't reduced the rates.
The factors making DC so deadly are part of the story of why America as a whole is so deadly, but these cannot include high gun ownership.

Facts don't care about your feelings.
And blaming this on Republicans' (which Libs made trend ALL of yesterday is...stupid.

Washington DC hasn't had a Republican mayor since literally 1933...and hasn't had a single Republican on its city council since 2008.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m….

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m…
The same thing is true of ALL the cities with REALLY BAD gun homicide rates.

In 2019:

St Louis, 64.54 murders per 100k, last GOP Mayor left in 1949

Its the 9th most violent city in the world.
The murder rate in Baltimore is 58.27 per 100,000.

Its the 11th most violent city in the world...and has VERY strict gun laws.
This goes and and on down the list...check it for yourself.

I stopped looking for a Republican mayor after a while because it was all Dems forever.

cbsnews.com/pictures/murde…
Yet...as I noted yesterday...

Libs PRIMARY RESPONSE is to blame the GOP for this...when they are LITERALLY THE ONES IN CHARGE of the cities choking under gun violence.

You want to know how to convince me the Libs are serious about gun control?

When they actually bring down gun homicide rates in the cities they've politically dominated for decades.

Instead, they ALWAYS cast blame on everyone but themselves.
Talk to any Lib about Chicago gun violence...which is so bad there's literal websites dedicated to statistically tracking it...and they'll blame Indiana's gun laws.

heyjackass.com
This is because the ONLY move Libs have to distract from the fact that places they've subjected to VERY STRICT gun control laws is to...blame neighboring Republicans.
Laws that we know work (like cracking down on straw buyers) get entirely ignored in favor of oblivious attempts to gin up political support for policies we know DO NOT work bc we saw them fail in Dem controlled cities.
Statistically speaking, the most effective laws for reducing gun violence and gun homicides is cracking down on straw purchasing...that is someone buying a gun for a person not legally able to have one. And it isn't even close.
Basically every state (including ones with very intense gun laws) doesn't take straw purchases of firearms very seriously.

It's MOSTLY a misdemeanor. Nobody bothers to enforce it.
As Kevin W of NR says...this is because of bureaucratic laziness more than anything else.

Its easier to pressure a federally licensed retailers with fixed addresses and regular business hours than it is to go chasing Joe Gangster’s rap-sheet-free girlfriend all over St. Louis
Here's a rather well reported Washington Post story on how this works.

washingtonpost.com/classic-apps/o…
If you can't read it, its the saga of one specific straw purchased gun being used in a dozen criminal acts. The person who bought the gun committed a felony in the state (Virginia) where he bought it.

He pled guilty to this and got a slap on the wrist.
This is what annoys me so much about the "gun control" debate...its entirely media driven to gin up outrage, not solve problems.

Media shift the responsibility for criminal violence away from the criminals who did it and onto 3rd parties that are easier to police.
And who just so happen to have deeper pockets.

You can't sue Baker (the guy who bought the gun in the WaPo story) or Stunna (rapper who acquired the gun). There's no $ in that.

But u can shake down Bob' Shotgun Emporium or Remington & that's what Libs ACTUALLY want
Meanwhile, a few U.S. ZIP codes, practically all of them represented exclusively by political party which always promotes gun control, are plagued by gun homicides and nobody in power is willing to lift a pinky finger to do anything meaningful about it.
Nobody cares on the left cares about saving lives in this debate, they care about the prospect of letting their lawyer friends make money and getting a bit of desperately needed extra political energy.

That's all folks, going to dinner.
One last post on this topic...

Just wanted to address this point and others like it on the main thread as I can't do it in my messages due to volume.

Depending on your distribution, sometimes “outliers” are the only thing that matters.
I've said this before in replies, but it's REALLY sketchy to start your interval for recording the average number of terrorist attacks the day after the last major terrorist attack.

To steal an argument Suppose I’m trying to make an argument that earthquakes are NBD for Haiti.
I could make a graph showing that since January 13, 2010, fewer Haitians have died per year from earthquake-related causes than whatever, and say "why worry about outliers.

Well, the Haitian earthquake of January 12, 2010 killed about 100,000 people. Outlier is all that matters.
Also, I do not have a SoundCloud or Substack...even though I'm told that's the traditional thing to shill when going viral.

So instead let me shill my writing here at @nro.

nationalreview.com/author/andrew-…

And the donate button for my wonderful employer.

clubforgrowth.org/donate-club-fo…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Follett

Andrew Follett Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewCFollett

Apr 12
Its endlessly amazing to me that post-modernism...an ideology which literally says that ideologies are bad...has spawned the most puritanical, deranged, and intolerant ideology of our time...social justice.
The MOST EFFECTIVE way to make human beings miserable is saying they don't have control over their lives.

If someone's in withdrawal, telling them "pain will never end and u'll die eventually anyways" is WORST POSSIBLE option...but that's precisely what SJs do on EVERYTHING.
If u want 2 understand what's going on today...u have 2 first understand most young people were raised in an environment where deranged social justice beliefs their parents thought were insane were treated as near religious truth, bc radical leftists took over education system.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 11
Reminder that you...PERSONALLY as a taxpayer owe $242,500 thanks to our government spending like a drunken sailor...mostly due to MASSIVE entitlement spending.

Our national government increasingly looks like a pension and insurance provider which runs a navy on the side. ImageImage
It is now almost a mathematical certainty that the US is paying too much in interest to ever really touch the principal.

As soon as market finds another place to put $, interest payments will some day balloon very rapidly until every additional increase in revenue.
This is because Boomers broke the inter-generational compact, and it will be up to those who follow them (like me) to clean up the mess.

Prior generations spent their whole lives getting stuff they didn't pay for. We'll go ours paying for things we didn't get.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 21
Ok, I'll take a look at @LastWeekTonight's claims about Critical Race Theory

Oliver starts off at around 1:30 complaining about parents speaking up at school board meetings.

He specifically cites a woman saying "I'm not co-parenting with the gov't" & another saying the US elected Obama and thus isn't racist...
Oliver claims America is racist because "people kept saying" Obama wasn't really American & was born in Kenya.

Gosh John, who are those people?

Hint: Hillary Clinton's team

Naturally, Oliver blames Trump...somehow.

So right off the bat, Oliver's being very dishonest.
Read 29 tweets
Feb 19
How'd this campaign tactic work for Terry M, Larry?

And why are you doubling down on that failure?

Is it because you've become a partisan hack who cant comprehend that the majority of the country doesn't agree with your dumb takes?
Larry For Terry unfollowed me right before the election for pointing out the transparently obvious...

It's worth noting that the tactics you're trying to use suck Larry...

Biden won VA by about 10. He's currently down 20 in it for a 30 point swing!

The "blame Trump for everything" strategy has zero appeal outside of the most deranged parts of academia. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 29
Two year ago tomorrow The Washington Post ran an article claiming "real danger" of Covid19 was racism.

washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/0…

This leftist trash made contributed to deaths of 880,000 Americans.

Our media and "experts" utterly failed us ...and haven't been held to account
WaPo ran another op-ed worrying that the REAL worry about COVID19 was that Trump would respond to it overly aggressively.

Because aggressive containment measures would harm "already marginalized populations."
The New York Times ran an article claiming that Trump's attempt to keep the virus in China by sealing the borders was unjust & racist.

Yes, it actually said that.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 27
This is why you NEVER apologize to The Libs.

No matter how right you were and what you say (and @ishapiro was 100% right that limiting the pool to 2% of lawyers arbitrarily will get a worse candidate)...it'll never be enough.
I like IS a lot. He's a solid dude.

But apologizing to a bunch of people who were never gonna accept his apology was a bad move.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(