I want to thank @MO_Independent for this reporting. It is good and important reporting, and I thank them for shining a light on missing foster kids in Missouri.
Foster kids belong to all of us, and we should all care.
I hope other states, and other reporters, do the same.
Some backstory: Missouri has a heightened interest in this issue because of an HHS report from last year. New reporting suggests Missouri is not an outlier, so I suggest people from other states also look at the report to see how their state can improve. oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/OE…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This week, a juvenile officer was indicted on a charge of child sex trafficking. justice.gov/usao-edmo/pr/l…
For those who don't know the Missouri family court system, a juvenile officer (JO) is the person who is responsible for recommending to a judge that a child be removed from the home and put under the state's custody.
In most states, the agency responsible for ensuring the well-being of the child (Children's Division) makes this recommendation. But in Missouri, CD does the investigation and gives recommendations to the JO, who then can petition the court to remove the child (or not).
I discussed Missouri's trigger ban with an ER doc recently. Missouri would make it a class B felony to perform or induce an abortion "except in cases of medical emergency." That exception is an affirmative defense. But what does that mean?
That means if a doctor performs or induces an abortion they open themselves to criminal charges. "Medical emergency" is not defined and will have to be sorted out by the courts.
That can't be sorted out by the courts unless there is a case before them - i.e. a doctor has to be charged and go to trial before the courts can sort it out.
I've seen too many takes this morning already of "why don't the Democrats DO something?" Blaming the people you support for not getting things through a system that's designed to require compromise is not helpful.
In Congress, there are not enough Democrats to force anything through without compromise. (unless they change the filibuster. That's not what this thread is about.)
I’ve been doing a lot of work this session related to abuse and human trafficking. These days, the word “groomer” is being thrown around by right-wing extremists against organizations like Disney. 🧵1/
By this usage, one could easily interpret "groomer" to mean “a person who would teach children about aspects of life that you would prefer to shield them from.” 2/
Grooming is a form of psychological manipulation that forms a bond between an abuser and an abused person. It is like “Stockholm syndrome” where people develop positive feelings toward their abusers.
I am now aware of three facilities in Missouri, all exempt from licensure, that reportedly regularly abuse(d) children: Circle of Hope (closed), Agape Boarding School (still open), and Camp Kanaukak. news-leader.com/story/news/loc…
Last year, the Missouri legislature passed a law to regulate license-exempt residential facilities. Part of this law allows the attorney general to file suit to close down residential facilities that abuse children. house.mo.gov/billtracking/b…
Despite the good work of @robertbucklin8 and others, Agape remains open. I want to focus here on summer camps though.
They don't just take SSI. They take survivor benefits from Social Security, Railroad Pensions and Veterans' benefits. If a child in foster care receives a lump sum payment, the state takes it.
I'll add that federal law does not mandate this, but is flexible enough to allow for it. We need to fix it at the federal and state level.
"The child, the child's parents, any fiduciary or any rep. payee holding or receiving money that are vested rights solely for or on behalf of a child are jointly and severally liable for funds expended by the division to or on behalf of the child." revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSectio…