Thank you for your letter dated 27th April, wherein you stated that 'there is currently no evidence' [that the PM misled the House of Commons], and that a vote of no confidence...
...'would [not] be helpful in advance of the Met Police completing their investigations and the release of Sue Gray's full report'. Now that the Met have completed their investigation & the report has been released, I am keen to hear how you intend to proceed.
We have irrefutable evidence that Boris Johnson lied to the House (in January & on 29th March). Johnson stated that he had been 'repeatedly assured...that there was no party...and that no rules were broken.' His statement was demonstrably untrue...
...as we know from Sue Gray's report, the 126 fines issued, and the Downing Street whistleblower accounts given last week.
My first question is whether you have yet written to the 1922 Committee; if not, when do you intend to stand with your colleagues (12 & counting) & do so?
On the 27th April you wrote 'if the PM lied, he knows he will have to go'. I'm afraid that your apparent faith in Boris Johnson seems again misplaced, given that he clearly has no intention of resigning, despite demeaning his office in a way that continues to insult UK democracy.
...It made chilling reading to learn two days ago that our PM has rewritten the Ministerial Code to remove the ministerial obligation to resign following a breach.
...He has also removed all references to integrity, honesty and transparency from the foreword. In my view this is a sickening additional affront to our political system, and demonstrates how far Johnson is prepared to go to retain power.
...My second question is what your view is on this 'rewrite the rules' approach to Johnson's own failings: does this sit right with you, @Offord4Hendon?
As long as you are MP, @Offord4Hendon, I will not stop asking you to stand up for democracy & rule of law, which look more like tongue-in-cheek allusions than 'Tory values' by the day.
🧵With (some) Tory MPs finally acting against their corrupt sham of a PM*, it would be great to see current and former politicians of all allegiances joining @99Organisation.
🏘️Many politicians want to improve their communities
🧒& invest wisely in the future so today's children have a better life
💷& end mass impoverishment
😡Our increasingly polarising, vitriolic & corrupt Cabinet is good for almost no-one.
🚨It's very bad for 99% of us.
(2/)
👩⚖️Johnson is the first serving PM to be found guilty of a criminal offence
🗑️He won't resign
🪧Our democratic rights are vanishing
🥣Most of us are getting poorer (largely due to Brexit & Govt bungling, compounded by COVID & war in Ukraine)
🪙 While Govt friends get richer
“[Johnson] is showing signs of being extremely impatient in regard to the constitutional constraints upon him. He gets angry if the courts or parliament try to interfere...'
- adding this clause: 1.7 Where the PM determines that a breach of the expected standards has occurred, he may ask the Independent Adviser for confidential advice on the appropriate sanction. The
final decision rests with the PM...
...Where the PM retains his confidence in the Minister, available sanctions include requiring some form of public apology, remedial action, or removal of ministerial salary for a period.
Now, Johnson alone decides the fate of any minister, including himself 🚨🚨🚨