The NY Times, which has been thundering against Putin, sagely advises its readers that Biden's planned trip to Saudi Arabia "represents the triumph of realpolitik over moral outrage, according to foreign policy experts." No doubt. 1/ #UkraineRussianWar
But there may be a deeply moral purpose behind the trip. Biden will, if time allows, take the opportunity to ask Sultan Mohammed bin Salman where his killers disposed of the dismembered corpse of poor Washington Post columnist #JamalKhashoggi. 2/
Biden's trip to Saudi Arabia exposes the hypocrisy of the imperialist war against Russia. On March 12, the blood-drenched Saudi regime executed 81 civilian dissidents. 3/
Since 2015, the regime, with US backing, has waged a war against #Yemen that has killed 400,000 civilians and placed 16 million in danger of starvation. According to the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft: 4/
"American involvement in supporting Saudi-led military action against the Houthis in Yemen, rather than helping to resolve the conflict as the Biden administration claims, is prolonging and escalating the violence." 5/
The US sponsorship and instigation of this and countless other human rights atrocities does not stop the miserable petty-bourgeois moralists of the press and academia from giving their full-throated endorsement of the imperialist crusade against Russia. 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On May 3 Thomas Friedman, the NY Times' lead columnist wrote: "A Message to the Biden Team on Ukraine: Talk Less." He added: And let’s be careful not to raise Ukrainian expectations too high. Small countries that suddenly get the backing of big powers can get intoxicated." 1/
On May 6, Friedman again expressed concern that the war was spinning out of control, writing "The war is getting dangerous for America, and Biden knows it" and that "falling in love with Ukraine in ways that will get us enmeshed there forever, is the height of folly." 2/
On May 22, Friedman reported that he had been invited to have lunch with Biden at the White House, where he washed down a tuna fish salad with a chocolate milk shake. Friedman explained that Biden's comments were "all off the record — so I can’t tell you anything he said." 3/
The Biden administration's decision to provide Ukraine with what the president himself described yesterday in a NY Times column as "advanced rocket systems" is a massive escalation of the war with potentially catastrophic consequences. #UkraineRussiaWar 1/
Biden's claim that "We do not seek a war between NATO and Russia" is a lie. NATO, supplying Ukraine with unlimited financial and military support, is at war with Russia. And having made this vast commitment, the US is taking reckless actions to defeat Russia. 2/
Biden writes: "So long as the United States or our allies are not attacked, we will not be directly engaged in this conflict, either by sending American troops to fight in Ukraine or by attacking Russian forces." 3/
In years to come, serious historians will examine the tragic consequences of the US drive for global hegemony in the aftermath of the dissolution of the Soviet Union. 1/ #UkraineWar
They will expose the geopolitical and economic interests that motivated the decades of wars unleashed by the United States in the Balkans, Middle East and Central Asia between 1991 and 2021, at the cost of several million lives. 2/
In reconstructing this escalating rampage of violence, culminating in the launching of war against Russia, historians will call attention to the intellectual and moral disintegration of large numbers of academics, who served as lying and cowardly accomplices of US imperialism. 3/
The #NYTimes editorial - titled "The War in Ukraine is Getting Complicated, and America Isn't Ready" - indicates serious divisions within and between the White House and intelligence agencies over the course of NATO's war against Russia. 1/ #UkraineRussianWar
The NYT expresses concerns about the war's "extraordinary costs and serious dangers," and states "there are many questions that President Biden has yet to answer for the American public with regard to the continued involvement of the United States in this conflict." 2/
For the last three months the NYT has incited pro-war and anti-Russia hysteria. But it now writes that it is not "in America's best interest to plunge into an all-out war with Russia, even if a negotiated peace may require Ukraine to make some hard decisions." 3/
The New York Times' op-ed column by @TimothyDSnyder - "We Should Say It. Russia is Fascist" - is yet another example of the Yale professor's role as an unscrupulous purveyor of historical falsification aimed at legitimizing the US-NATO war against Russia. 1/ #UkraineRussiaWar
Snyder writes that Russia is "fighting a fascist war of destruction," and warns "Should Russia win, fascists around the world will be comforted." 2/
This claim ignores not only the involvement of right-wing governments and powerful right-wing extremist movements in the NATO coalition. Snyder again conceals the fact that the Ukrainian fascists of the #AzovBattalion are in the forefront of the war against Russia. 3/
In a NY Times article titled, "After the fall of Mariupol, the fates of hundreds of fighters hangs in the balance," the following amazing sentence appears: 1/
"The Azov regiment has been given outsized coverage by the country’s [Russia's] state-run news media, and its connection with far-right movements gave a veneer of credibility to the Kremlin’s false claims that its forces were fighting Nazis in Ukraine." 2/
The #AzovBattalion does not merely have a "connection with far-right movements"; it is a large and powerful fascist force that has become a dominant element in Ukraine's military. 3/