You know how every time Pride Month comes around with the parades and coloured crosswalks, you start seeing comments like, “I don’t care if you’re gay, just don’t shove your sexuality in my face.”?
Well, I’ve been thinking about that.
See, straight people like this don’t actually care if queer people march in parades.
Here in Lethbridge, for example, our annual summer fair kicks off with a parade, and I bet there are a few queer people in that parade. And these straight people don’t care.
These straight people don’t actually care if queer folk march. It’s not the marching that’s the big deal.
These straight people don’t like knowing that queer people aren’t straight when they’re marching.
They want to assume everyone is straight. They want to assume everyone is like them. Because if everyone is the same, then it’s easier to justify their rhetoric of hate.
That’s why they don’t have a problem when other straight people shove their sexuality in their face with handholding, kissing, or hugging.
Because it’s not the public nature of the sexuality that’s the problem. It’s that the public sexuality isn’t the same as their sexuality.
And if everyone isn’t the same—if there are gay people, and bisexual people, and trans people, and intersex people, and asexual people, and all sorts of identities that aren’t straight and cisgender—that challenges their rhetoric of hate.
Actually, for that matter, when you hear people complain that there are too many letters in the LGBTTQQIAAP acronym or that there are too many sexual orientations and gender identities, it’s the same thing.
“There are too many initials” or “I can’t keep track of all these new identities” is just a coded way to say “I’m uncomfortable that you’re not like me and it delegitimizes what I was taught.”
But that’s good. It’s good these straight people are uncomfortable.
Imagine what it must be like to grow up in a society where you think everyone else isn’t like you, where you’re the only one like you. Where society is designed for everyone but you. “Discomfort” seems to be inadequate to describe that experience.
Maybe it’s time straight, cisgender people accept discomfort. Getting rid of prejudice and hate is impossible without discomfort.
Reproductive justice isn’t just about making sure abortions are accessible to those who need them
It’s also making birth control freely available for those who don’t want to be pregnant in the first place.
It’s also providing comprehensive sex education so people can make informed choices regard reproduction.
It’s also creating a society that supports parents who have children, whether that’s mental health care or reducing how much unpaid domestic labour they have to do, or providing universally accessible childcare and parental leave.
I recently came to the realization as to why conservatives are so intent on having one parent (usually the mother) staying home.
🧵
First of all, the idea of a stay-at-home parent is a recent one. Throughout most of human history, parents worked together to manage their household, both working to perform the labour necessary to care for their children and home.
It wasn’t until capitalism emerged and people were forced to leave their agrarian lifestyle to work in the city that the mutual labour of parents was disrupted.
Let’s remember on this day, that without women’s labour, the economy would fall apart.
Sure, the fact that 47% of Canada’s workforce 25 years old and older, for example, are women is part of that point. If they all walked off the job, we’d have to somehow virtually double the men in the workforce. And that’s not including females under 25.
And, frankly, I don’t blame people. I personally hate being in debt, owing people money.
I don’t like owing thousands of dollars in business debt for a business that no longer exists. Or tens of thousands of dollars in student loan debt. Or thousands of dollars in consumer debt from living off credits cards after being laid off twice in a 3-year period. And so on.
But here’s the thing about debt: it pays for stuff.
Debt got me a house to live in. It got me an education that got me the best paying job I ever had prior to working for myself. It got me a vehicle that doesn’t always fall apart. It put food on my family’s plates. And so on.
And by that, I don’t mean that all leftists should go to church. What I mean is that I think the left, in general, is too dismissive of religion.
Many of the leftists I meet see themselves as rational, with no need for God or religion. They’re often atheist and see religious people as deluded or ignorant. Or both.
And they have a stereotype in their mind that they pigeonhole religious people into: that of a socially conservative person stuck in the 1950s, who hates women and minorities, loves capitalism, and doesn’t care about the environment.