If you read history, you find in many battles Indian defenders mobilized much larger army against invading force & yet they lost in home ground? Why? Let me explain 1. Indian defenders were always like crowd - soldiers on contract #TourofDuty of Modi 2. Gave unorganized battles
Halla Bol was favorite battle strategy of Indians. Just gather crowd with arms and just stand wait. Could never develop idea of organized battles. like Peshwa moving his Muslim arty as vanguard against Abdali defying every mil tactics.
3. Centralized command in King and if kind died-U Army dispersed. 4. Using animals as shield. War elephants are excellent offensive weapons but were always used as defensive shield. Result they could never prove fatal rather turned back and routed ur own army. 5..Caste system.
Only minor section of society stood up to fight, other made deals. For example, When Gauri attacked Kul Chand at Mahaban, Brahmins made deal with Gauri and helped him defeat Kul Chand. It also resulted in population not harassing any invading army. 6 Slow speed of mil ops
Like in Leh Indian army took more then 3 months just to match Chinese capabilities. No enemy will give you this time. 7. Inferior mil tech and inability to cut enemies logistics. You will be surprised. Most times invasion were result of internal invitations and support

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ashok Kr Singh

Ashok Kr Singh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ashokkmrsingh

Jun 6
Do you know? What is main reason of stopping recruitment in army? It was due to #FarmersProtest . Surprised? Yes. Reports of many young soldiers and youths aspiring to join army from farming communities supporting #FarmersProtest made certain lobbies nervous. recruitment stopped
#TourofDuty is brain child of such nervous lobbies to dismantle such regimental pride of army.. This scheme plans to take away your pride, your self respect, your history and your political stakes. It will hit Mahar, Maratha, Rajputs, Gurjars, Ahirs, Sikh, Jat pride badly.....
Idea is to dismantle these social group based regiments with all India Class and that too hiring soldiers on contract so that they don't develop any pride. I am all for development of idea of India. I support inclusiveness and doctrine of equal opportunities but ..
Read 9 tweets
Jun 5
#TourOfDuty I once again warn.. Just to provide low cost military trained manpower for corporate security don't screw up whole system.. Cost of pension can be reduced anyway.. There are betterways of doing things. Let me explain what are the main objective of this scheme, why
Is this being forced by PMO on Military and what are its pitfalls.. Certain lobbies controlling political power in this country do not like backward villagers and soldiers shouting 'Sada Hak Aithe Rakh' so whole idea is to steam them out by making them corporate dependent..
Some people also feel it will help them more in so called strategy of Coup Fencing of Army.. In addition it provides cheap trained manpower for corporate security and cuts cost.. But if compared with such man power joining CAPF.. Then cost is still more..
Read 10 tweets
Jun 4
#PrithivRajChauhan as our forefathers as rulers of Mahaban, took part in his first battle against Gauri - I must share the stories told to us by our Jagas. 1. Gurjar Prthivi was king of Ajmer and Anagpal Tomar of Delhi. 2. Armies of almost 104 kings of North India gathered to
fight Gauri . 3 As Anagpal was old could not lead in battle and had no son. Dispute over who will lead battle against Gauri erupted. 4 Jaichand laid strongest claim and had support of almost all powerful kings of North India. But dispute still could not be resolved.
5 As armies of Gauri were near, matter was left to Anang Pal to decide. 6 Anang Pal nominated Gurjar King Parthivi Raj as holder of Kachtra in battle because he was son of his daughter and two he was king of a small faraway state of Ajmer and had no local influence. 6.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 4
Is war in Ukraine war for India too? Our honorable foreign minister raised this issue recently in an interview.. Well in Hybrid war scanario trade wars are also part of war efforts... Considering that we must see is war in Ukraine having any military or trade impact on India?
Honourable Foriegn Minister @DrSJaishankar ji let us see impact of war in Ukraine on India 1. Oil prices are today at 120, screwing Indian trade balance 2. Certain critical mil hardware supply from Ukraine is effected specially engines for navy ships 3
3 It has pushed to India to possibilities of West putting sanctions on India which India can not bear. So naturally if this war has put India in tight spot thn its India's war too. In my views its time to negotiate avoid too bold and dangerous statements. Like defending China
Read 4 tweets
Jun 4
Please note.. 1. Indian growth history is closely linked with western order 2. Nehru isolated India with western economic order just to promote himself as global socialist leader.. Result in first 50 years of Indep our growth rate was horrific.. 3. It is only when India
3. It is only when India opened to western economic order India made rapid progress.. 4. We are now a highly integrated shadow economy of western order.. We like it or not.. That the truth.. 5. Don't forget China also made rapid growth with western support..
The biggest reason of China making rapid growth is western support... West gave more preference to China over India.. Naturally China grew faster... 6. Indian foriegn trade gives you net deficit.. Its only contribution of NRIs and OCIs which makes it profitable.. 7.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 4
@DrSJaishankar do not commit same mistake which Nehru did. Nehru ignored India in lust of promoting himself as global leader. Though he stood as leader from third world but Indians lost. Modi has done the same mistake and your are now supporting it.
Modi has promoted himself globally as a Brand for his own political gains. He has ignored India and Indians. How? By offering good defense deals ....In Global market you are being treated as a client with deep pockets naturally they will fool you by pumping your ego.
#Trumph made fool out of Modi. India has deep pockets of foreign reserves because Indians working abroad has contributed immensely and mind you they have done it without any Govt support. In actual trade India is in deficit .. Mr Honorable Foreign Minister you cant take pungga?
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(