#OnThisDay in Labour history 5 years ago it was polling day in the 2017 general election🌹

While tens of thousands of Labour activists started knocking on doors, my day started with a meeting at the Cabinet Office with Karie Murphy to discuss arrangements if should Labour win🧵
Labour had a 24-point deficit when the campaign began. But in their final polls the major polling companies put the deficit anywhere between a 1-point and a 13-point lead for the Tories

In the last week we met 3 times with the Cabinet Secretary, as they planned for every outcome
Walking along Victoria Street (by Labour HQ) with a colleague in the early summer sunshine, and exhausted by 8 weeks of gruelling election campaign, I recall saying:

“Whatever happens tonight, I’m really proud of what we’ve done – I don’t think we could have done any more”
At the start of the campaign we were written off. We were, in the words of the Daily Mail, going to be crushed

Senior Labour HQ staff were plotting our demise, and planning for a leadership election

But thousands of activists who thronged streets thought otherwise ✊
Then, at 22:00 that exit poll dropped.

David Dimbleby explained, “The Conservatives are the largest party. Note they do not have an overall majority”

I turned away from the screen with my hands over mouth, mumbling the mantra, “please be f**king true”
At 22:22, Karie and I received an email from the Cabinet Office that read:

“Just sending this to open a line of contact if and as needed. Let's see what happens”

As the results came in, and Labour won seats it had never held before, for a moment even this didn't seem impossible
Obviously we didn't make it to No.10

But in taking away the Conservatives' majority we stopped some Tory policies - like the dementia tax, expansion of grammar schools, removing housing benefit from young people, and possibly the return of fox-hunting - from happening ...
Labour had gained its largest increase in the share of the vote since 1945

We had added 3.5m extra votes from the 2015 general election just two years earlier

And Labour had gained seats for the first time since 1997, adding 30 extra Labour MPs #forthemanynotthefew🌹
🧵ends
BONUS: This retrospective tweet thread on #GE2017 has inadvertently elicited this insight. And credit to top pollster Chris for it

But it also reminded me that this isn't the first time a post-debate poll involving Jeremy Corbyn has been suppressed…🧵
In June 2015 Newsnight organised a hustings for the Labour leadership contest between the four candidates on the ballot paper

Jeremy did very well in the debate (as @paulwaugh observed at the time ) ...
After the debate, streamed live on the BBC News Channel, went off-air, the #Newsnight team asked the audience who they thought did best: Corbyn won the vote of ex-Labour voters overwhelmingly

A prodcuer told me that would air on Newsnight. But it never did despite our complaints
Didn't do us any harm, Jeremy won by a landslide

As an aside, there's some amusing footage of the BBC News channel interviewing candidates' backers after the debate - and the camera having to pan (plummet!) down to me (5'7) after interviewing 6'7 @tobyperkinsmp (backing Liz K)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Fisher

Andrew Fisher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FisherAndrew79

Jun 9
It's true that it would be better for housing benefit to go to paying a mortgage than to subsidise the property empires of corporate landlords ...

But, even if banks will accept housing benefit as mortgage payment there are still some obstacles ... 1/n
Most banks have a max. loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of 90% - meaning benefit claimants would need a 10% deposit

In almost every part of the country that exceeds the DWP maximum savings limit of £16,000

(If you have >£16k in savings you legally aren't entitled to most benefits) 2/n
According to @ONS the average UK house price is £278,000 - so you'd need a minimum deposit of £27.8k to get a mortgage from most lenders.

How many benefit claimants would have that (even if DWP removed the savings limit)?

In London, the average house price is now £523,000! 3/n
Read 5 tweets
Jun 7
#OnThisDay in Labour history 21 years ago …

Labour won the 2001 general election in a landslide victory over William Hague’s Conservatives, losing just 6 seats (from 418 to 412) from the 1997 landslide 🗳️🌹

🧵...
While nothing had much changed in terms of parliamentary seats, a lot had changed in terms of votes:

Labour won in 1997 on a 71% turnout with 13.5 million votes. In 2001 Labour had polled only 10.7m votes on a turnout of just 59.4% - the lowest since 1918 ...
Even though the parties’ overall representation did change much, some notable MPs stood down in 2001 ...

And some MPs, who would go on to play a significant role in British politics, were elected for the first time in 2001 ...
Read 10 tweets
May 22
#OnThisDay 3 years ago, after six weeks of negotiations, Theresa May made a Statement to the House of Commons as cross-party Brexit talks with Labour ended without agreement

Two days later May resigned. Johnson would become PM and the rest is history

This is what happened…🧵
Corbyn wrote to the PM on 17/05/19, stating

“While there are some areas where compromise has been possible, we have been unable to bridge important gaps

“The increasing weakness of your government means there cannot be confidence in securing whatever might be agreed between us”
However, that is not to say there was not some willingness to compromise on both sides

A deal was theoretically possible, but practically undeliverable (Oliver Eagleton's recent book acknowledges the first, but obscures the second)

Let me explain …
Read 16 tweets
May 16
Five years ago today, the Labour Party manifesto for the 2017 General Election was officially launched at Bradford University 🌹

Some had been so excited by it, they wanted people to have it early … but this 🧵 is the story of what happened next …
When he came off stage, Jeremy signed a copy and gave it to me:

“Andrew, a brilliant and superb piece of work to transform lives. Love to you … in deep appreciation, Jeremy”
The manifesto was fully costed, in ‘Funding Britain’s Future’, published the same day

It was the first time a party had done this – credit John McDonnell's innovation and Rory's perspiration and dedication

As John said "The only numbers in Tory manifesto are the page numbers"
Read 11 tweets
May 11
I’ve just seen these posts from Tom. And so I just want to go through his thread, for the record

When I phoned Jeremy (who had the manifesto the same day as Tom) I asked him whether he'd he sent it on to anyone? When I phoned Tom I asked him the same …🧵
This is true (I'd forgotten at that stage about Welsh & Scottish Labour) but as I said above, I asked both Jeremy & Tom if they'd shared it, who might have had access to their email, and if they’d printed it, left it anywhere, etc
This seems a blatant lie. Or more generously, perhaps Tom has forgotten that we went through the versions on the night of the leak and I agreed with him that it wasn’t the same version I had sent him.

If others still suspected him... 🤷‍♂️👇
Read 6 tweets
May 10
Five years ago today, I was working in Labour HQ on the #GE2017 campaign

In two days’ time the manifesto was going before the Clause V meeting of 80 delegates for sign-off, before its launch the following week

Just after 9pm, an ashen-looking @schneiderhome approached me… 🧵
He told me that the Daily Mirror and Daily Telegraph had the manifesto, and were going to publish it

I had been working over 100 hours a week, non-stop writing, editing and negotiating - alongside a brilliant team doing similarly

I was gutted and angry, wondering “HOW?”
Most other senior staff & politicians were in another meeting, which I'd missed to focus on final edits before Clause V

A febrile inquiry and crisis management plan kicked into gear immediately. This had never happened before in British electoral history

Let’s start with how…
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(