To support biosafety and biosecurity investigations into the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 into the human
population through a laboratory incident; the SAGO notes that....
the need to access to & review evidence of all lab activities (both in vitro & in vivo studies) with coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2-related viruses or close ancestors & the lab’s approach to implementation & improvement of lab biosafety & biosecurity.
3. POLITE SAGO
"As it is not common practice to publish the institutional implementation of biosafety & biosecurity practices of individual labs in peer-reviewed scientific journals, additional information will need to be obtained and reviewed to make conclusive recommendations"
4. OBJECTIONS OVERULED
SAGO agreed (apart from 3 objections) that:
"it remains important to consider all scientific data available either through published or other official sources to evaluate the possibility of the introduction of SARS-CoV-2.. through a laboratory incident"
5. SAGO RECOMMENDS..
"Additional investigations should be carried out with the staff... in the laboratories working with SARS-like viruses in Wuhan and potentially with those located worldwide where early COVID-19 cases have been retrospectively detected before 2020"
6. SAGO, BETTER LATE THAN NEVER...
"This would provide an opportunity for more specific questions to be asked related to biosafety and biosecurity management of SARS-like virus studies at the individual laboratories"
"This would provide an opportunity for staff and scientists to give their perspective on the
possibility of a laboratory incident and whether any occupational illnesses occurred before
the recognized start of the pandemic."
8. OH SAGO, WHAT A NICE SURPRISE!
"Examine regulatory biosafety or biocontainment standards and biocontainment levels and risk-mitigation strategies for SARS-like CoV-associated studies"
9. WAY TO GO, SAGO!
Determine occupational hazards intrinsic to labs working with SARS-like CoV & nature of studies performed before 1st reported COVID-19 cases in Wuhan, if they involved reverse engineering/GOF/ genetic manipulation/animal studies with strains of SARS-like CoV
10. SAGO's 1, 2,3
1.
Determine risks associated with field-related activities, such as the collection of specimens from bats or other wildlife sources and the potential for SARS-like CoV infection of staff.
11. SAGO's 1, 2,3
2.
Evaluate potential scenarios where a breakdown in biosafety or biosecurity procedures led to a possible laboratory-acquired infection with the studied pathogen.
12. SAGO's 1, 2,3
3. Determine if there were any biocontainment breaches or lab incidents or accidents with SARS-like coronaviruses in BSL2/3/4 labs that may have resulted in escape and/or infection of staff members prior to December 2019 where early cases were detected in China
13. SAGO PROPOSES
"Global engagement with scientists working on SARS-like viruses in bats to seek input on the molecular biology and evolution of these viruses and to identify potential biosafety issues"
14. SAGO ALSO PROPOSES...
15. SAGO INTEGRITY
Despite scurrilous attempts by Dr. Dedkov, Pasteur Institute Russia, Dr Morel, MOH, Brasil & Professor Yungui Yang, Beijing Institute of Genomics to delete mentions of a possible lab leak, it seems that SAGO acted with certain integrity in this investigation.
16. Dr. Dedkov's "DeadCov Position"
was summed up here in Xinhua in 2021:
Interview: Politicizing emergence of new viruses hinders scientific research: Russian expert
"All of the scientists joining this process understand the external pressures, scrutiny & visibility of the process. It may be our last chance to understand the origins of this virus in a mutually responsible way”
Overall, this report by SAGO is good news for those who remain convinced that SARS-COV-2 resulted from a Lab Leak, but how it translates into reality remains to be seen, as with cooking a SAGO pudding
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Did ye sing, John Ball,
as they pulled you apart?
A poet speaking for us all
from England’s tattered heart.
What a price, John Ball,
for singing to us all.
When hope came as a crime
in simple rhythm and rhyme.
2. He who sings a blackbird’s song
to a starved & battered throng
with a message to stand strong
would never last long.
So we’ll sing to John Ball
for the helpless & hopeless,
the voiceless, forgotten,
buried beneath the mansions
of Lords; misbegotten
mortar, stones & chandeliers
3. the scarlet grave goods
of England’s preening peers.
We’ll sing in simple rhymes
and hope for better times,
when those barons’ grandchildren,
so viscous, reptilian,
are thrown from their seat
in ignominious defeat.
Here is my attempt at a simple summary of what @JasperFarlake & @dr_louwen claim (July 2026)
1. In early 2020, Chinese scientists published the first big paper on the COVID virus using fluid samples taken from patients’ lungs in Wuhan in December 2019.
1. An Indecent Proposal for Protecting our Pensioners
and preventing their Further Decay!
It is a melancholy object to those who walk through our parks or scroll through our family chat groups to behold the wretched condition of our retirees.
2. These once-vigorous souls, now bent over glowing rectangles at all hours, doom scrolling through tales of grandchildren’s exotic holidays, political apocalypses, and filtered neighbours’ perfect kitchens.
3. Their posture collapses, their sleep evaporates, their blood pressure soars, and their remaining years dissolve into envious bitterness.
1. Federal agencies like the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) as well as the NIAID were funding a remarkable array of research projects around the world..
2. "through a small cabal of civilian actors that in aggregate constituted a de facto bioweapons development program. In my job as data analyst for University of California, I had access to enough data to strongly suspect the existence of such a program"
He has a MA in Biophysics from the University of California, Berkeley. He worked as an analyst for thirty years in the University of California’s Office of the President.
2. The whistleblower just testified that following pressure & interference from mid-level & senior CIA leadership, the team's lab-leak findings were suppressed.
3. On August 17, 2021, the team was forced to reverse its stance and officially submit a conclusion stating they were unable to determine the origin, which formed the basis of the declassified ODNI report released later that month.