Thread by @MrDarnton

Why do I believe Craig Wright Is Satoshi Nakamoto?

There is overwhelming evidence.

This is one of the craziest stories you will EVER hear.

#BSV $BTC

Firstly, some context. Satoshi Nakamoto has been idolised by the BTC community as the next coming of Jesus, a God-like figure, a mysterious force who has “saved us from our economic collapse”.

Let’s be realistic. Satoshi was not Jesus. Satoshi was just very smart individual(s).

There is an array of evidence that Craig Wright is Satoshi.

Witness testimonies.
Legal cases.
Australian tax office.
Knowledge of Bitcoin as Turing complete.

Why have you not heard this before? Well, the BTC community doesn’t want you to know.

A recent case between Kleiman V Wright took place. This was based on the fact that Kleiman family accused Wright of defrauding Kleiman of 1.1M Bitcoins and intellectual property rights.

Furthermore, case added Kleiman and Wright collaborated on Bitcoin creation.

Specifically, the case was about if there was a partnership between Wright & Kleiman to launch Bitcoin.

The case did not specifically answer is Craig was Satoshi, however it adds to the overwhelming evidence that Craig was involved with Bitcoin creation.

The jury concluded that Craig owned $0 to the estate of his late friend.

Gavin Andresen is a lead developer of Bitcoin who has had personal interactions with Satoshi. Andresen testified under oath that, he still believes Craig is Satoshi.

Actually, he even mentioned that Wright signed early blocks of his choosing with the Nakamoto keys on computers.

Craig’s uncle – Mr Donald Lynam – testified that his nephew had shown him copies of Bitcoin whitepaper, and that he had run an early node when Bitcoin was being set up.

This was all under oath.

Craig’s uncle actually went on to mention that Craig had a strong relationship with his grandfather, a cryptographer during WW2, and had a lifelong interest in the types of technical subjects one would need to create Bitcoin.

Craig actually does have over 17 degrees. These qualifications are in a range of fields, such as philosophy, computer science and economics.

Who else has 17+ degrees?

Stefan Mathews also testified about his relationship with Craig.

Matthews said that he had been in discussions with Wright in the early 2000s, involved specifically with a range of topics relating to security components and economic modelling around digital cash and gold.

Matthews said “these were highly fragmented discussions,”. “I never thought much about it until he [Craig Wright] started to bring things together.”

Matthews explains that, “The paper was very closely worded in recollection to the final paper [Bitcoin White Paper]. It talked about peer to peer electronic cash. It certainly referenced that in the form of Bitcoin.”

Matthews’ first recollection of the Bitcoin White Paper was a version that came in a USB stick that Dr. Wright handed over to him to read.

Matthews said this all under oath.

BDO case is perhaps the most interesting case of them all. BDO is a leading accounting network globally.

During the trial between Kleiman and Wright, the defence provided minute meetings from Wright’s former employer – namely BDO.

Craig worked at BDO as an auditor, in which he described his ambition to create and launch an electronic cash system.

During this period, Craig referred to the Bitcoin system as TimeChain. During the trial, evidence was revealed in which mentioned a “P2P e-cash system”.

Craig said that he originally had an idea for a system like this in 1998.

Craig said that he tried to pitch the idea of P2P cash to BDO, and he had a meeting with Allan Granger from BDO. Wright said that BDO did not accept his proposal to create the P2P e-cash system.

Furthermore, there has been an on-going case of “Bitcoin as Turing Complete” for some time.

Turing complete refers to a machine that, given enough time and memory along with necessary instructions, can solve computational problems, regardless of how complex.

Craig was the first person to highlight this.

There was a well-known debate between Craig & Nicholas Szabo – computer scientist, legal scholar, and cryptographer.

The debate took place during 2015.

Craig said that Bitcoin is Turing complete. Szabo seemed bemused, and dismissed the fact that Bitcoin is Turing Complete. Szabo stated that Craig should wright a paper on this. It is an “unconventional view that you have”, Szabo said.

How did Craig know this before anyone else?

Let’s just be realistic. Either this Craig guy has been lying for 15+ years. Literally devoting his whole life to a lie. Or, Craig actually is Satoshi.

Seriously.

What do you think?

Let me know of more evidence that Craig is Satoshi.