Seeing a lot of misconceptions and confusion around $stETH (@LidoFinance liquid staked Ether)
Thought I’d write a short thread on my perspective
$stETH is a fully collateralized representation of $ETH staked on the Ethereum PoS beacon chain
1 $stETH = 1 staked $ETH
When withdraws are enabled on beacon chain, 1 $stETH can be redeemed for 1 ETH
Any comparisons to an undercollateralized stablecoin like $UST are misguided
I think any comparisons of $stETH to $GBTC are misguided as well
$stETH is an ERC20 token that has utility within a growing DeFi ecosystem
It also have a native yield attached which you cannot get by having liquid $ETH alone
There are many who will take the carry risk
$stETH doesn’t have a target peg, it continues to be collateralized regardless of what the secondary market values it at
Being able to exchange your $stETH on the secondary market for $ETH is simply for convenience, but you’ll get what the market values it at
Generally $stETH won’t trade at a value above 1 ETH as long as deposits is uncapped
This is because of arbitrage
If $stETH trades at 1.05 ETH
I can deposit 1 $ETH to Lido, get 1 $stETH, sell it on a secondary market for 1.05 $ETH, profit 0.05 $ETH and push price of $stETH down
Currently this arbitrage only works one direction
$stETH can’t be redeemed *yet* but once it can, reverse arbitrage is simple
If $stETH trades at 0.95 ETH, I can buy 1 $stETH for 0.95 $ETH, then redeem it for 1 $ETH, for a profit of 0.05 $ETH and pushing the price of $stETH up
Important to note that withdraws of $ETH from the beacon chain will not be enabled once the merge happens
It will be the first hard fork 6-12 months after the merge
Hence, $stETH may not be redeemable for a while
Also there is a withdraw queue on the beacon chain
There’s various reasons $stETH may temporarily trade above/below its collateral value
That last one is what most of the current fud around $stETH is coming from
$stETH is an ERC20 which can be used in the DeFi ecosystem as collateral
People have deposited $stETH as collateral on Aave, borrowed $ETH, deposited into Lido for $stETH, and repeat
Thus if people continue to sell $stETH on the secondary market, there may be a liquidation cascade from these leveraged positions being flushed out
Larger market makers/manipulators have already exited, but some still remain
Celsius may or may not be running into liquidity issues, but they hold a significant amount of $stETH which is being used as collateral to borrow stablecoins
If sold, this would definitely cause stETH’s secondary market value to decrease, at least temporarily
The flip side to all of this, is that regardless of how the secondary market values $stETH
$stETH is still backed 1:1 by staked $ETH
Depending on your time preference and risk tolerance, buying $stETH below its treasury value is boosted yield
If 1 $stETH is trading at a value of 0.70 $ETH (30% discount) and Ethereum staking yield remains 4% APR
Then in two years, your aggregate yield will have been 38% APR, rather than 8% as a normal staker
(Ethereum staking doesn’t auto-compound yield)
Is that worth two yield of illiquidity and Lido risk exposure?
Not for everyone, but definitely for some
So while a liquidation cascade won’t be pretty, and secondary market price for $stETH probably won’t be 1:1 $ETH for a while
It’s no death spiral situation
I think after the event passes, $stETH will probably trade at a discount to its collateral value
3-5% seems likely but it depends largely on market sentiment
Regardless, the beacon chain will keep working, so will DeFi, and so will Lido for that matter as well
This is a decent thread on the situation, but read it with the above context in mind
.@mirror_protocol has just been exploited again due to Terra Classic validators reporting the price of the new Terra 2.0 $LUNA coin (~$9.80) instead of the original Terra Classic $LUNC coin (~$0.0001)