EuropeanPowell Profile picture
Jun 16, 2022 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Had a question, why do you think there is such a dearth of info about the Tories charter cities and freeport plans post Brexit? #Libertarian #BrexitLies
Do people know what charter cities are? Because this is actually a key hidden plan behind the Brexit campaign. Sunak is a disciple of Prof.Paul Romer who experimented with r/w charter cities in Honduras and Madagascar, Honduran Supreme Court shut him down. So off they trot to UK.
UK is in transition, an 'emerging economy' now with 3rd country status. A regression has been instrumented whereby the clean slate has foreign frontier capitalists/ UK hedge funders queuing up with multinational pals for their chunk of flesh and a UK ruled by and for shareholders
For this to happen, decades of libertarian think tanks and corporate lobbyists bought Govt policy via the revolving door, the charity staus of think tanks keep getting away with not disclosing their funders or even the details of their meetings. Tax payer pays MP's subscriptions
to ERG, £2000 per year. Over half of FOI requests denied, research of ERG never made public, minutes of meetings never disclosed yet the ERG are known as 'the party within a party' and wield an extraordinary amount of power over MP's
Behind the headlines, this is what the Tories are planning for their post Brexit 'Global Britain' Clue, you and your families are ATM's. Explainer on Charter cities 🧵👇🏻
May 2022 article on Sunak's charter city plans for post Brexit UK now an emerging economy ripe for frontier capitalists to swoop in rewrite laws and 'experiment' on local communities under shareholder diktats. No one is taking this seriously.
policyexchange.org.uk/the-chancellor…
Please look at article, 'levelling up, unleashing potential, harmony between public and private sector, Tory voter don't want an ever-growing state, policy experimentation in unproductive environments' Honduran Supreme Court shut down Romers charter city, he and Sunak off to UK!
@HenryKangaroo @vivamjm @bakerstherald @AnnAubert3 @BylineTimes
Sunak & his mentor Paul Romer preparing the UK for enterprise zones aka charter cities post Brexit. An experiment in policy making in unproductive environments, full blown stealth reconfiguration of UK economy
Please read! Incredibly well researched article on charter cities, that's private cities owned by foreign multinationals rewriting laws beyond Govt reach, the Brexit plan all along, Neo Feudalism. The Tories had their revolution, it's time for ours.
medium.com/@cormack.lawso…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with EuropeanPowell

EuropeanPowell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EuropeanPowell

Jan 13
It's all coming out.
Listen to the account of Sasha Riley.
Trump bought and sold children with Epstein.
"I watched Trump kill a litter of puppies, they made me stand there, he would carve or kill the puppy and look to see what my reaction was"
"While we were in that room, adults at that party bust in the room, one of them had a gun, they assaulted her at gunpoint, they killed her in front of me"
substack.com/home/post/p-17…
During the years SR was trafficked within the Trump/Epstein ring, he was forced to perform sexual acts during the filming of several child pornography films, including a snuff film. He recalls at least 10-12 such films. During the snuff film shoot, SR saw a girl child shot and killed during filming. After another film shoot, a girl child was taken to another room. SR recalls hearing gunshots. He said that when he heard the gunshots, he was scared. He said that another perpetrator still in the room with him, sensing his fear, said, “Don’t worry. Boys are hard to find.” The films were produced within the Trump/Epstein ring.
Pedophile perpetrators Sascha is willing to testify against include Donald J. Trump, Andy Biggs, Jim Jordan, Lindsey Graham and Clarence Thomas.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 12
Let’s begin with what we can prove beyond doubt.
Guardian documents reveal a corruption scheme so brazen it belongs in a textbook on state capture. Here’s how it works:
The Money: Larry Ellison, Oracle founder and Trump associate, has funneled over £300 million to the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (TBI). Oracle already holds £1 billion in existing UK government cloud contracts with the Home Office, Ministry of Justice, and Department for Work and Pensions. In November 2025, the Home Office quietly extended Oracle’s deal by £54 million for five years.

open.substack.com/pub/europeanpo…
The Salon Dinner: In January 2025, at London’s five-star Corinthia Hotel, Tony Blair and Nick Clegg (then Meta’s president for global affairs) hosted six tech company leaders plus Poppy Gustafsson, UK Investment Minister. Days later, TBI received early access to the AI action plan they would publicly endorse.
This is corruption: Private funding of policy development + early government access + public endorsement + funder profits from resulting policy.
The Oracle Advisor Scandal: Oracle’s strategic advisor Hillel Fuld published posts advocating the forced tattooing of prisoners with the Star of David. Australia revoked his visa in June 2025 citing incitement concerns. This is someone advising the company managing UK digital identity infrastructure. No public debate. No ethical vetting. No accountability.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 7
Updates on Forest City 1
1. Paul Powlesland has confirmed he IS a board member of ACDC - the company receiving 80 acres worth millions. He previously forced me to publicly apologise TWICE for saying this. I was telling the truth. He concealed it.
ribaj.com/intelligence/b…
2. @horton_official 's quote from The Guardian's article dated 23rd Nov 2025 - 'Malik’s almost 800 supporters span the political spectrum, including Green party campaigners and leaders of rightwing thinktanks. He’s also enlisted Paul Powlesland, a nature campaigner and barrister, to join the board of the Albion City Development Corporation, which is overseeing the proposal'.
theguardian.com/environment/20…
3. I've now learned Dame Patricia Hewitt was the Secretary of State for Health from 2005 to 2007, and a member of the Labour Party - she is a key signatory lending establishment credibility to Forest City 1 - Hewitt is Shiv Malik's MOTHER-IN-LAW. This family relationship has never been disclosed in any promotional materials.
4. So the "cross-party support" includes:
Malik's mother-in-law (undisclosed)
Board member presented as independent watchdog (undisclosed)
Libertarian think tanks (disclosed)
80 acres for founders (admitted)
Where's the transparency?
5/ Malik has called me a "liar" and a "grifter" for exposing Forest City 1's charter city structure.
But HE conceals:
His mother-in-law's support
Powlesland's board position
The appointed trustee governance
The SEZ exemptions sought
6. The Guardian never disclosed:
Hewitt's family relationship
The governance structure details
The SEZ exemptions
The 80-acre founder gift
This isn't journalism, it's PR for insiders.
7. When "independent supporters" turn out to be board members and family, "transparency" looks very different.
Suffolk deserves the truth about who profits and who controls Forest City before decisions become irreversible.
Suffolk is not just a housing proposal.
It is the dress rehearsal for the privatisation of British geography.
And the left-wing signatories, however well-meaning, are currently the most effective part of the camouflage.
Forest City 1 Reality: The Community Land Trust (CLT) model is presented as progressive; residents gaining “genuine ownership.” But examine what this actually means: residents purchase property within a corporate-controlled jurisdiction operating under special legal status. Their “ownership” exists within a framework controlled by the Albion City Development Corporation (ACDC).
I have written several articles about Forest City 1, Suffolk. Please read, subscribe and share.
Forest City: The Ideological Coalition That Should Never Exist
open.substack.com/pub/europeanpo…
Forest City 1 (UK) as NRx Prototype: A Critical Analysis
substack.com/@europeanpowel…
URGENT WARNING: Forest City 1 and the Charter City Agenda
europeanpowell.substack.com/p/urgent-warni…
Suffolk's Forest City and the Ghost of Próspera: Why Britain Should Learn From Honduras
europeanpowell.substack.com/p/suffolks-for…
LBC’s Forest City Lovefest: How the Spiked Network Sold a Libertarian Dream as Community Housing
europeanpowell.substack.com/p/lbcs-forest-…Image
Image
If Forest City proceeds, here’s what you’re accepting:
1. Democratic Accountability Becomes Optional
Appointed trustees with binding charters replace elected local councils.
2. Your Villages Have No Guaranteed Veto
The Secretary of State in Westminster decides your community’s fate, not you.
3. Private Corporations Get Permanent Governance Rights
Through appointed trust boards and 25-year SEZ licenses.
4. Tax Revenue Is Negotiable
“Canary Wharf style” exemptions mean businesses don’t pay what everyone else pays—and you make up the difference.
5. Planning Law Is Bypassed
Development corporation powers override normal democratic planning processes.
6. Basic Services Could Be Weaponized
Próspera charter city (Honduras) cut off water when residents resisted. Who controls your water, electricity, internet in a privately-governed zone?
7. It Sets A National Precedent
If Suffolk accepts this, charter cities spread:
- “Tech City North” (Manchester corridor)
- “Green City Wales” (Cardiff corridor)
- “Innovation City Scotland” (Central Belt)
On 5 December 2025, LBC’s Ali Miraj gave Austin Williams 45 minutes of unchallenged airtime to promote Forest City 1, a proposed million-person city on 45,000 acres between Newmarket and Haverhill in Suffolk. Listeners heard about Tesla robo-vans, nuclear reactors, 400,000 affordable homes, all delivered by private visionaries “independent of the state.”

What they didn’t hear could fill a book. And what was deliberately left out exposes this for what it really is: a coordinated libertarian network using progressive language to advance a charter city experiment that would strip democratic control from Suffolk communities.
Miraj introduced Williams simply as “architect, author, and director of the Future Cities Project.” That’s like introducing Rupert Murdoch as “a media professional”—technically true, but missing the entire story.

Austin Williams is a founding member of the LM network, the libertarian group that emerged from Living Marxism magazine after it went bankrupt in 2000. He’s been a regular Spiked contributor since 2002, writing dozens of articles celebrating deregulation, dismissing sustainability as anti-human control, and praising authoritarian development models that bypass democratic accountability.

But here’s where it gets interesting: Spiked is funded in part by the Charles Koch Foundation, the billionaire libertarian network that bankrolls free-market think tanks worldwide. And Fraser Myers, Spiked’s deputy editor, is a public signatory to the Forest City 1 petition. So is Austin Williams himself.

This wasn’t journalism, it was an infomercial delivered by one Spiked network member, broadcast without disclosure, for a project publicly backed by another Spiked network member. The circle is complete.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 1
2024 was the year when Starmer's government sealed the fate of the electorate's future by partnering up with the most powerful corporations on the planet, handing over governance powers to corporations under localised freedoms in +140 free zones, which as of Jan 1st 2026 still remain vastly under-reported.
PPP on steroids.
Thread
Here's my guide on how to halt the corporate capture of the Commons👇🏻
substack.com/@europeanpowel…Image
Image
Image
These corporations have now been given access to the UK's critical infrastructure, which they describe as new, additional assets to their financial portfolios.
Both the Tories and Starmer's Labour continue to sell the lie that PPP, disproportionately dominated by corporate interests, is something that will help the vast majority of people. This couldn't be further from the truth, as corporate profits surged to utterly obscene levels, while public services, already in a perpetual state of permanent atrophy, are dismantled.
substack.com/@europeanpowel…
Where do deregulated free zones come in?
Imagine a map of the UK, visualise vast regions ring-fenced as Special Economic Zones, Food Enterprise Zones, freeports, University Enterprise Zones, Industrial Strategy Zones, and AI Growth Zones.
These are known as carve-outs, they form a patchwork of deregulated enclaves with separate laws and regulations to the host country.
The UK Govt lied about these zones having the same laws and regulations as non-free zone regions.
substack.com/@europeanpowel…
Read 9 tweets
Dec 27, 2025
The Corporate Carve-Up of Britain: 12 Actions to Fight Back Against Enterprise Zones
What You Can Do About UK Enterprise Zones
Labour’s Industrial Strategy Zones are accelerating the transformation of British democracy into corporate fiefdoms. Here’s what you need to know and what you can do about it.

Britain is being carved up. Not through dramatic privatisation announcements or controversial legislation, but through a quiet, systematic network of over 140 enterprise zones that operate outside normal democratic control, offer corporations tax breaks worth billions, and are now being consolidated and expanded under Labour’s Industrial Strategy.
Thread
These aren’t marginal experiments. They cover food production, universities, defence, AI development, data centres, and entire regional economies. They use public money to subsidise private profit while bypassing the democratic oversight that would normally apply to such spending.

The model is simple: designate an area as a “zone,” suspend normal planning rules and democratic accountability, offer corporations tax breaks and regulatory freedom, and lock in these advantages through 25-year contracts that outlast multiple governments.
Labour’s merger of Freeports and Investment Zones into Industrial Strategy Zones isn’t a technocratic reorganisation, it’s a rapid acceleration. More zones. More corporate power. Less democratic control.

But resistance is possible. These zones depend on public money, political protection, legal frameworks, and community acquiescence. All of these can be challenged.
Read 18 tweets
Dec 17, 2025
Results of UK Freeports under the duopoly (2021-2024)
The underwhelming performance patterns of previous free zones under Thatcher and Cameron continue the neoliberal zonification of the UK under the Starmer Government's 'newer/rebranded' Freeports programme.
In 2022, the UK Govt estimated freeports would create 214,000 jobs, but as of February 2024 only 4% of that target had been achieved.
A 2024 House of Commons report shows freeports missed their job goals by 77% to 96%.
The British public is being scammed yet again, as State aid post-Brexit is being extracted hand over fist, the illusion of corporate welfare for economic growth does what it was always designed to do, destroy the commons and usher in a corporate political model of governance while extracting public money with malice.Image
What’s happening is a repeat of the first rollout of free zones under Thatcher, which were a disaster, the excuse was the EU prevented 'real growth' due to restrictions on State aid, but given the scandalous results at Teesside, exposed by @PrivateEyeNews , £560 million in taxpayers money was splurged on Teesside Freeport, (22.4 times the original amount of £25 million).
This raises serious questions about the efficacy of free zone policy, by repeating the same mistakes again and again.
There is no other way to interpret what has transpired, a corporate political heist of public money under the guise of ‘economic growth’, so-called Brexit freedoms have literally lined the pockets of a few businessmen, such as those at Teesside, which was after all, the flagship Brexit Freeport of Rishi Sunak.
These are important concerns that are well-supported by both the documented historical evidence.
Here are the patterns for all to see:
The Repetition of Failed Policy
A cycle of repeating demonstrably ineffective policies. The evidence shows:
1980s Enterprise Zones → 2011 Enterprise Zones → 2021 Freeports → 2025 Industrial Strategy Zones
Each iteration underperforms against targets, yet the policy gets rebranded and relaunched.
The core problems remain constant across all iterations.

The Teesside Case
The Teesside situation saw £560 million spent (22 times the original allocation) exemplifying critical risks:
Deadweight: Activity that would have happened anyway
Displacement: Simply moving economic activity from one place to another rather than creating new activity
Capture by existing interests: Benefits flowing to landowners and existing businesses rather than creating genuinely new economic opportunities

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) expects Freeports "to generate little additional activity, with most of it being displaced from other areas"
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(