We started an investigation on this indiscriminate shelling because of the fact that a DPR representative claimed it was an Ukrainian shelling and Ukrainian sources claimed this was a Russian shelling for a pretext.
So who could be right?
1,5km away from impact area.
Speed of sound 343 m/s so rougly 5 seconds delay. The movie starts immediately with the sound of impacts.
14/
When the last one occurred there is indeed a delay about 5 Seconds.
So how many impacts where there?
How much flashes do we see?
We see around 17+ flashes --> We can hear 5/6 before flashes reach the POV. So we have an estimation around 20-25 impacts.
15/
We have to take in account that it's at least around 25 impacts because the filming started when the shelling was already busy.
Timing of the shelling (video): 15 seconds.
(again we don't know how long it's been going on)
So this would mean 25/15= 0,6 sec for each impact.
16/
So now the "Impact" video's (with some analyses of those impact's).
We know there are at least 20 impacts, so footage should emerge. And it did.
In this thread we only analyse the impacts where we GeoConfirmed the location.
17/
"At the moment of detonation, the basic warhead scatters a total of 3,922 fragments, killing and injuring anyone in its midst. The area affected by the blast and fragmentation of each high explosive warhead that strikes the ground is measured at 700m sq."
48/
"This is an area roughly equivalent to a circle with a radius of 15m, although Grad rockets spit most of their fragmentation effects in an area forward of where the rockets land."
49/
So based on the information of the impact area and the facts above, we can conclude it's highly likely that a Grad was used.
So we know the WHAT? WHEN? HOW? now we try to answer the FROM WHERE.
50/
To asses the launch direction we based us on the known spreading pattern of a Grad Impact: This is a high angle type of ammunition. So the mortar perception of impacts is used.
On the last 2 impacts we can't make an assessment because they fell on a roof and we don't have a clear view on the impact.
Even with room for error, and based on the orientation of the buildings it's highly likely that the launch direction is to the NW of the impact area.
59/
If we put everything together (direction + BM-21 Grad) we can conclude that this should be the area from where the launch took place.
Black line = Frontline assessment of that day by @DavidBatashvili
So what does this mean? The front line is approx 9 km's away from the impact zone.
The minimum range for the use of a GRAD is depending from which source is used between 3km and 5km (We don't take the Direct Fire method in account cause of the urban nature of impact area)
62/
Grad rockets have the same initial velocity so that means that their range is determent by the inclination.
If we take a look at the impacts we see that the impacts have an angle between 30 and 45 degrees.
We also know that the impact zone is roughly 600m x 600m. How further you fire with a GRAD how bigger the spreading of impacts.
64/
So who is responsible?
If this would be done by Russia that would mean they had to place their GRAD(s) on the active (!) frontline, which is unlikely.
65/
So based on all this information we can assume this was an Ukrainian attack with a GRAD BM-21 from the area West of Avdiivka. But can we find other information of this possibility?
66/
On 31 MAY "The Sun" posted a video on YouTube titled "Ukrainian soldiers fire a flurry of rockets at Russian targets in Donetsk"
In this video you only see one BM-21 who fires a few rockets at targets in Donetsk.
So they were in the area.
/67
And then you also have the shelling history of Donetsk:
For Donetsk Ukraine has a history of using Unguided rockets.
Ukraine never officially denied that it wasn't them.
They are shelling military targets in Donetsk on a daily basis and if you use unguided rockets for it, it sometimes goes wrong.
The use of a GRAD against populated area's is by nature of the weapon system just wrong.
71/
Russia is shelling dozens of cities with unguided rockets, they are committing a lot of war crimes and they violate the Convention of Geneva on a daily basis.
Conclusion:
In this case it is our assumption that this shelling was highly likely done by the Ukrainian military.
72/
Something about the indiscriminate shelling of populated area's 👇
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977.
"2M people have seen this picture on #Telegram (without blur): "🇷🇺 Russian soldier was chained [...] tortured and [...] set on fire while still alive."
GeoConfirmed Investigation - Thread 3 - October 7th 2023.
Thread 3 - 'Nahal Oz' area.
This thread contains footage of the Nahal Oz area.
At least four different factions participated in the assault on the military base near Nahal Oz and the kibbutz itself:
a) Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, military wing of Hamas.
b) Al-Quds Brigades, military wing of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
c) Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades.
d) Palestinian Freedom Movement, Al-Ansar Brigades
---
If any new geolocated footage related to this topic becomes available in the future, it will be added at the end of this thread.
---
If you like our work you can buy us a coffee (buymeacoffee.com/geoconfirmed)
By doing so, you are enabling us to enhance our website and servers, and allowing us to buy satellite imagery for our investigations.
1/X
GeoConfirmed 7OCT23.
At sunrise, a large convoy of Palestinian militants, over 30, drive towards Israel in jeeps and with motorcycles. They drive in the direction of Nahal Oz, whilst outgoing rocket fire can be heard and seen.
GeoConfirmed Investigation - Thread 2 - October 7th 2023.
Thread 2 - Zikim area.
This thread contains footage of the Zikim area, highlighting three events:
1) Destruction of Remote-Controlled Weapon Systems
Israeli guard towers along the fence were equipped with remotely controlled weapon systems. These systems were neutralized at the onset of the attack using grenades dropped from drones.
This tactic mirrors the widespread use of drone-dropped munitions observed in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia.
2) Coastal Infiltration
Militants also employed boats to infiltrate the area via the coastline.
3) Civilian Casualties
The attack resulted in civilian casualties, including teenagers, who were killed at close range.
---
If any new geolocated footage related to this topic becomes available in the future, it will be added at the end of this thread.
---
If you like our work you can buy us a coffee (buymeacoffee.com/geoconfirmed) By doing so, you are enabling us to enhance our website and servers, and allowing us to buy satellite imagery for our investigations.
1/X
October 7th 2023.
Smoke emanating from two locations near the Shikma Reservoir, Israel filmed by a Hamas drone.
Point of View - 31.58415, 34.501819
Smoke 1: around 31.595433, 34.493592
Smoke 2: around 31.594119, 34.497942
GeoConfirmed Investigation - Thread 1 - October 7th 2023.
Thread 1 - Massive Rocket barrage.
The attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, began with an unprecedented rocket barrage at approximately 6:30 a.m. local time.
Thousands of rockets were fired from Gaza into Israel, targeting various areas. This massive rocket attack forced many Israelis to seek shelter in bunkers and safe rooms.
The timing of the attack was strategically chosen to coincide with the Jewish holiday of Simchat Torah, when security forces were operating at minimum levels. This reduced security presence, combined with the early morning timing and the chaos caused by the rocket barrage, allowed Hamas militants to breach the Gaza-Israel barrier more easily.
---
If any new geolocated footage related to this topic becomes available in the future, it will be added at the end of this thread.
---
If you like our work you can buy us a coffee (buymeacoffee.com/geoconfirmed)
By doing so, you are enabling us to enhance our website and servers, and allowing us to buy satellite imagery for our investigations.
A Belgian journalist and his fixer were abducted in Beirut, Lebanon, while his cameraman was shot in the leg and left behind. The journalist and the fixer were released a few hours later, albeit with injuries.
Yesterday @WarMonitors made some unusual assertions regarding "a Zionist spy that many Lebanese have seen many times"
These claims were accompanied by two videos, which were initially difficult to geolocate.
Both tweets had over 13k likes and over a million views.
---
In the morning, Belgian news agencies began reporting on the well-known war journalist @ramaekers_robin, who, along with his fixer, was kidnapped while covering the bombing of a specific apartment building in Bachoura Beirut, reportedly the office of Hezbullah's MP Amine Cherri.
(x.com/GeoConfirmed/s…)
When Robin was speaking with eyewitnesses of the attack, things went wrong. A group of approximately twenty men assaulted the journalists. The men accused Robin and Stijn of spying for Israel and began shooting at Stijn, who was hit by two bullets in the leg. Robin and the fixer were beaten and dragged away. They were then locked in a basement, where they were beaten several more times and interrogated for hours.
After their release, both journalists were hospitalized for their injuries. Ramaekers suffered facial fractures, while De Smet was treated for a leg wound caused by gunshots.
❌"Cemetery of Ukrainian tanks in the Kursk region." ❌
These are Russian tanks that have been marked with Ukrainian symbols following their capture during the Ukrainian Kharkiv offensive in autumn 2022, near the village of Myrne. ✅
Factchecked by @BuschModelar and community noted.
Despite this, the post remains pinned to the profile and is going viral, currently boasting 1.1 million views.
In the comments, the author (@Ug_chelsea) is engaging in discussions with users who point out the flaws in his/her post, remaining entirely convinced of his/her perspective.
Now @EjShahid has geolocated this location, proving again that this is disinformation:
Thread of 'Kursk' related geolocations.
New ones will be added at the end.
It seems they aimed to demonstrate that, even a year after Russian separatists conducted an incursion from Ukraine into Russia, Russia still struggles to adequately protect its borders.
A Russian drone targets Ukrainian armored vehicles (Humvees), with a new tactical sign, and infantry, with at least three dropped explosives, in Basivka, Sumy region.