I'm super excited to share the results of our phase 2 randomised clinical trial using gut microbial metabolites to lower #bloodpressure, for now as a pre-print
We started this work after our discovery in 2017 in mice that gut microbial metabolites explained the long-known association between high fibre intake and lower blood pressure and cardiovascular disease
Subsequently, we tested all 3 gut microbial metabolites in mice
While acetate still had the best #bloodpressure lowering results, butyrate had an essential impact on the gut tissue itself, key for improving the gut epithelial barrier
However, mice receive these in their drinking water
We needed to find a way to deliver this to patients that i) tasted good to ensure compliance, and ii) resulted in slow, continuous release of acetate+butyrate
So we employed a new fibre supplement enriched for these metabolites, used by our collaborator Charles Mackay in @NatImmunol
This is important because the gut microbiota still ferments this fibre, resulting in the slow release of the metabolites
We designed a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over phase 2 trial
Placebo controlling and double-blinding is a challenge for dietary studies, but we found a way by engaging with a research chef & dietitians
Participants ate the yummy chef-cooked meals 2x/day
We measured blood pressure using 24-hour monitoring, as well as home blood pressure, over a period of 3 weeks
Participants had 3 weeks off between study arms
Bloods and faecal samples were collected to measure levels of gut metabolites and microbiota
So what did we find?
Our intervention:
I) Increased levels of acetate and butyrate
II) Lowered 24-hour and central systolic blood pressure, with a clinically relevant effect
III) Changed the microbiota to produce even further microbial metabolites
This is exciting because:
I) We have been able to go from 2 experimental models to a clinical trial in 5 years - very rare in medicine!
II) Provides a new tool for hypertensive patients to lower their blood pressure
As I’m scoring fellowships I have some suggestions for those writing one, now or in the future:
1- Make it easy for the reader to find the info we need. Use headings, separate types of presentations (oral/poster/presenter/invited) and papers (first author or not)
2-Give the info that was asked in a succinct manner. No need to write hundreds of words just because you are allowed to.
If they ask you to list your top 5 papers/awards/presentations but you have 3 don’t make up stuff that is not relevant
We can see through that 🤨
3- Under publications, don’t add things that are not publications to increase numbers (eg conference abstract - in my opinion that’s not a paper). For me, this immediately raises a red flag 🚩 and makes me wonder what else might be hidden in the application
Truly grateful to announce I have been promoted to Associate Professor at @MonashBiol 😊
I would like to thank my team & former team members, my collaborators, mentors, colleagues for the support and feedback @BBM_Wong and @RobertB_R, & my boss @OBryanMoira for the push to apply
Inspired by @jane_bourke_phd I would like to share how I got here because I look up to many & constantly think I am not doing 'well' enough. What I learned over the years is that on paper things look much more glamorous than they are (I call it the Instagram of academia) 1/
I came from a developing country (#Brazil) where research is not valued and there is little $ available. But I had amazing lecturers and teachers, and amazing opportunities to do research since I was an undergrad. This resulted in 5 papers prior to my PhD & helped me a lot 2/