Dont think ppl have fully grasped implications of horrible #SCOTUS#gun decision. "As of today, in order to be constitutional, any such law must have a specific historical precedent from the 18th or early-19th century." Ie the end of modern gun control.
As @voxdotcom@imillhiser puts it: “The future of gun control in the United States could be quite grim—and Bruen could mark the moment when lawmakers’ power to fight gun violence falls apart.” vox.com/2021/4/26/2236…
#SCOTUS undercut a central tenet of the anti-gun-violence movement—namely that people who live in towns, cities, and states should have the right to set laws and policies that work best for them. bostonreview.net/articles/the-s…
#SCOTUS effectively set an entirely new standard for reviewing gun laws, one that will render a host of present and future laws unconstitutional. Get ready for *many* gun control laws supported by towns and communities across the US to fall. #Shameful
And of course the irony: under this insane regime, there is no distinction between the wholly contextual and fake categories of 'good guys' and 'bad guys.' Everyone can carry a gun anywhere they want--and fearing others drives the market. The law only comes in after you shoot.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Loosening gun policies in Missouri went hand-in-hand with the loss of over ten thousand and five hundred years of productive male life in the state between 2008 and 2015....
Between 2008-2015, a person in Missouri was 11x more likely to die by gun suicide than in an accidental house fire, and 14.5x more likely to die by gun suicide than by “natural/environmental” causes ranging from...
...death by flood, earthquake, tornado, falling from a ladder, electrocution, smoke inhalation, or after being bitten by a dog.....
For anyone wondering why Trump would even consider holding a WH balcony serenade while he remains infected and infectious...the #DyingOfWhiteness reason would be, yet again, that he drives and is driven by the politics of racial resentment.....
By this logic, signaling his devotion to a hierarchy that keeps white people on top is more important then what might seem from the outside like self interest or communal well-being....
So while many wonder why Trump can hold another WH rally even when he has/embodies Covid-it’s sending a very particular message about whiteness and white America that he assumes a more powerful message for his supporters than what might seem from the outside like self interest...
Core Trump base no more likely to start wearing masks than they are to support healthcare reform, saving the planet, gun safety, etc. Rather, getting #COVID19 now takes on new political meaning--becomes an expression of self-sacrifice and a way of showing devotion to the cause.
To put it another way, getting and transmitting #COVID19 is the 'logical' next phase of not wearing masks. Public health becomes politicized and weaponized for the cause.
Getting and transmitting #COVID19 then becomes a way of being like Trump, showing resistance, devotion, sacrifice.
We need a leader who will flip the switch on divisive rhetoric, and who sees our diversity as our superpower @MarkRuffalo#WithBidenWeCan
I grew up in Missouri. I’ve seen neighbors and communities work together in common cause! It’s preposterous to think we can’t do so again when faced with these monumental challenges
Fight back against a system that sees our differences as political opportunities
New Trump HHS ad campaign aimed to put a positive spin on disastrous #COVID19 response will use slogan from Tim Burton classic, Mars Attacks: "Don't run, we are your friends..."
Another slogan they'll be testing: "Lets put it in perspective: the numbers of deaths from #COVID19 falls well short of the number of people who died during the Mesolithic Period, or Middle Stone Ages"
The fact of the matter is this: it is incredibly expensive for insurance companies to pay for pre-existing conditions. It’s much cheaper to let you die. ACA *remarkably* made that illegal, against all odds.
For people who have been critiquing the ACA for the past eight years for not going far enough....try getting that back after we lose it.
The ACA also remarkably closed health insurance inequities